December 23, 2004
Upset about Rummy's autopen? But why?
While everyone is getting into a lather about Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's use of an "autopen" to sign condolence letters to the families of deceased soldiers,
Ann Coulter puts the "scandal" entirely in perspective.
It occurred to someone (who obviously has the best interests of America at heart!) that among the letters Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld sends out there must be condolence letters to the families of servicemen who died for their country. So liberals are in a lather that those letters were signed by autopen.On the bright side, this is the first war America has been in where the number of casualties is small enough that it would even be theoretically possible for a Defense secretary to sign each condolence letter personally. When Democrats were running the Vietnam War, letters of condolence often began, "To whom it may concern" and were addressed to "occupant."
I've been so damn upset that Rumsfeld uses an autopen that I've barely had time to enjoy the "Giving Tree" season. Actually, I think it's time to come clean with my readers and admit that I belong to a small religious cult that celebrates the birth of Jesus this week. So things have been a little hectic.
And if the best liberals are going to give me to argue about this week is Autopen-gate, then I shall sleep well knowing that the secretary of defense has made so few mistakes for the past four years that liberals are reduced to carping about his autopen.
My wife (She-Who-Must-Be-Obeyed) and kids gave me a new journal and a pen set for my birthday last week.
Alas, it wasn't an autopen, so I'm forced to continue to sign the checks to pay the bills the old fashioned way. But maybe I'll get one before next Christmas to sign my Christmas cards with.
Posted by: mhking at
02:28 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 317 words, total size 2 kb.
1
A lttile context: The President signed all of his letters personally.
Posted by: BH at December 23, 2004 09:32 AM (Ki9Ww)
2
This seems to be over blown target practice to me.
Posted by: DarkStar at December 23, 2004 11:13 AM (cnw1A)
3
Autopens cost $15K. Don't hope for one.
Posted by: d at May 01, 2005 12:32 PM (LXCxR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 22, 2004
Now this is a guy with too much time on his hands...
Carlos Owens is building an 18-foot tall mech (or battle robot) in his back yard.
Owens, a 26 year-old steel worker in Anchorage, AK, plans on finishing it next summer.
"This is a concept that's been around for a long time," Owens said in a telephone interview. "But I'm not going to wait for the other guy to come out and make it when I've got the capability to do it myself."He's always had an eye for huge projects, and an inventor's itch. He built a 35-foot wooden version of his mecha when he was 19, he said, as a sculpture project because he couldn't afford the materials to make it function. The latest project, drawing on his experience in the Army and as a steelworker, is more ambitious.
"I've always been building things," he said. "But with the mecha I wanted to do something different than what everyone else was doing. It's hard to invent something new."
When completed, the idea is for the pilot to be able to strap himself into a central, padded compartment, and then control the mecha with the motions of his own body. When the pilot walks, the mecha walks. Raise an arm and open a hand, and the mecha does the same, with 46 possible movements planned.
Owens suggests on his own website,
Neogentronix.com, that one day mechs like this would be able to help put our wildfires or go into military combat.
Sounds like he's watched one too many episodes of Gundam Wing or someother Anime on Adult Swim.
Posted by: mhking at
09:03 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 281 words, total size 2 kb.
Watcher looking for more Watchers to Watch
The Watcher of Weasels
is looking to fill a vacancy among his ranks.
Indeed a prestigious place to watch from, mind you.
The rules are simple enough, and include weekly participation in the nomination and voting for the weekly Watcher of Weasels award.
Do you have what it takes to Watch?
Posted by: mhking at
08:09 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.
December 21, 2004
Peterson: "Say 'no' to Kwanzaa"
Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, head of the Los Angeles-based Brotherhood Organization for a New Destiny (BOND), was quoted in a release from BOND yesterday
denouncing the Kwanzaa holiday, which is traditionally celebrated the week between Christmas and New Year's Day.
(Peterson) notes that while public school administrators and city officials attempt to ban nativity scenes, Christmas carols, candy canes and even Christmas trees from public places, Kwanzaa has been accepted as mainstream.While commonly viewed as an "African" holiday, observed from Dec. 26 to Jan. 1, Kwanzaa actually was created in the U.S. in 1966 by Dr. Maulana "Ron" Karenga, the head of a violent black-power group, United Slaves Organization, which was a rival to the Black Panthers.
In the 1970s, Karenga served four years in prison for conspiracy and assault in the torture of two female followers.
In a 1978 interview quoted in the Washington Post, Karenga said, "People think it's African, but it's not. I came up with Kwanzaa because black people in this country wouldn't celebrate it if they knew it was American. Also, I put it around Christmas because I knew that's when a lot of bloods (blacks) would be partying."
Peterson insists that a continued acceptance of Kwanzaa as a holiday by the public, while the same public works to diminish the importance of Christmas is done at our peril.
"If black Christians don't stand up for Christmas and reject Kwanzaa, they are allowing evil to have its way," Peterson said. "They will regret using a fake holiday to stamp out the true meaning of Christmas."
Posted by: mhking at
08:09 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 268 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Has Mardi Gras taken away from Lent?
How about egg hunts? Have they taken away from Easter?
Peterson lacks the ability to correctly use logic. For example, he said because Jesse Jackson made the "Hymie town" comment, most Black preachers teach hatred of Israel.
You explain that "logic" to me. I couldn't follow it. And when I called his show to get him to explain it, he said I needed to be saved.
Posted by: DarkStar at December 21, 2004 08:22 AM (cnw1A)
2
DarkStar, setting aside the strictly religious aspect of Christmas (which, incidentally, I do every year as I'm not a religious person), I think that the general objection to Kwanzaa is that it is devisive. Kwanzaa was devised--or constructed, if you will--for no other reason than to divert attention from the historically religious holiday that is commonly known as Christmas. Karenga has said that, in fact. Mardi Gras and Easter egg hunts came after Lent and Easter were part of the common culture (Western culture, at least), just as Kwanzaa has, but they are a product of the observance of the holidays...not a stand-in. Kwanzaa, whether the folks who observe it realize it or not, has every intention of supplanting Christmas.
Yeah, Peterson may be overly zealous in his Gospel beliefs, but your "logic" is also faulty from the standpoint of a preconceived notion that an entirely fictitious holiday, based on fictional historical identities, is equally as valuable as Christmas is to the majority of US citizens. Your attempt to analytically dismiss objections to Kwanzaa is fallacious in and of itself. I'm not a religious person, but I admire the cultural advantage that we, as a nation, have gained from the mutual respect and morals that Christianity has provided in modern times. Karenga has neither.
Posted by: skh at December 21, 2004 08:47 PM (0xwoN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Nationals' stadium agreement reached
DC Council Chair Linda Cropp (L) & Mayor Anthony Williams |
The Washington Nationals will play in the nation's capitol this year after all, thanks to a
late-night agreement hammered out between DC City Council Chair Linda Cropp and Mayor Anthony Williams in Washington last night.
The compromise reached by Mayor Anthony A. Williams, D.C. Council Chairman Linda W. Cropp and baseball officials allows private financing for a 41,000-seat stadium on the Anacostia River south of the Capitol but would eliminate a provision voiding the deal if private financing isn't found.Estimates for the project, which includes land acquisition, street improvements, infrastructure upgrades and refurbishing RFK Stadium, start at $435 million.
The revised deal also splits the liability for cost overruns and missed construction deadlines evenly between the city and Major League Baseball, Williams spokesman Chris Bender said.
The full council is set to vote on the revised proposal today.
I would presume that the team store in Washington's Union Station will start selling merchandise and tickets again later today, after the vote is made official.
(More coverage from
Wizbang & others)
Posted by: mhking at
04:20 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 187 words, total size 2 kb.
Congratulations, Powerline!
Powerline earned "blog of the year"
honors from
Time in this week's issue (though the article is only available online if you subscribe to the dead-tree edition of
Time), primarily for their role in uncovering the CBS News - "Rathergate" scandal. I'm proud to have them
on my blogroll, and to have corresponded with them and the other blogs who have gained national notice over the year.
Plenty of sources in the mainstream media continue to ignore blogs, but the bottom line is that we - as a whole - are an important of the news stream in the world today, and we get information and attention focused to where it's necessary.
Of course, it's also fun to take digs at the "bigs" once in awhile, too.
Posted by: mhking at
04:12 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 135 words, total size 1 kb.
1
'tis a far,far better thing I do that I go to Ramblings' Journal for the news I need to draw DaybyDay....
Posted by: Chris Muir at December 21, 2004 04:42 AM (g/gbg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 20, 2004
GB receiver Ferguson hospitalized after vicious hit
Green Bay Packers receiver Robert Ferguson temporarily lost feeling in his legs last night after being clotheslined by Jacksonville Jaguars safety Donovan Darius.
Ferguson went up for a pass in the 4th quarter, and on coming down, Darius delivered a vicious clothesline to Ferguson's neck that sent his mouthpiece flying in one direction, his helmet in the other, and the fourth year receiver limply to the turf, unconcious.
Ferguson did not regain feeling in his legs until after he had been taken to a local hospital by ambulance. Jacksonville was penalized 15 yards for unsportsmanlike conduct, and Darius was ejected from the game, which Green Bay lost 28-25.
After the game, Darius was unapologetic.
"It's part of the game," Darius said. "Brett threw the ball and Ferguson was wide open. I was just running over trying to make a play, trying to separate him from the ball. I never intentionally try to hurt someone. I love to play the game and I play it 100 mph. Unfortunately, he got hurt. I pray for him. Everybody that saw it from our standpoint said it looked clean." But Packers receiver Antonio Chatman said it was clearly a dirty hit "because he got hit on the chin when he couldn't protect himself. I was just praying he was all right. We (receivers) don't go out to hurt nobody, or we'd be cutting them (defensive backs) every time. We block 'em like a man."
Darius said he's seen players stay in the game for hits worse than his.
"It was not intentional, I was just trying to make a play," he said. "I've done that in the past when I know I couldn't get an interception, I swung up, trying to get the ball. That's a technique."
Darius said he would appeal any fine the league hands down.
The NFL generally does not stand for injurius conduct like this from it's players -- you can be fairly certain that the League will send down a hefty fine to Darius for the hit.
The viciousness of the hit recalled a hit more than 25 years ago delivered by the Oakland Raiders' Jack Tatum to New England Patriots receiver Darryl Stingley, which left Stingley permanently paralyzed.
Here's hoping that we don't see any injurious cheap shots like that in the League any time soon.
Posted by: mhking at
04:11 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 402 words, total size 3 kb.
1
One major difference between last night's hit and the Tatum hit: when Tatum hit Stingley it was legal according to the rules of the day, and even Stingley says so. It's a thin line between playing hard and cheap shot, and I hope Ferguson is ok.
Posted by: Ted at December 20, 2004 07:07 AM (blNMI)
2
I saw it, and the hit wasn't intentional. It was a hard hit but all of the hits are hard hits.
The receiver and defender were in motion and it happened.
Posted by: DarkStar at December 20, 2004 03:52 PM (cnw1A)
3
I'm afraid I disagree, DS -- just because they're in motion doesn't mean squat. The player who's on the ground is in control of his movements a lot better than one who's in the air, and Darius could just as easily have made his move in a way that would have avoided knocking Ferguson out.
Posted by: McGehee at December 21, 2004 05:50 AM (S504z)
4
Ferguson moved "at the last moment" to try to avoid Darius. In fact, Ferguson clothes lined the guy because he would have missed the tackle.
Posted by: DarkStar at December 21, 2004 08:25 AM (cnw1A)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
LaShawn: Kwanzaa is for Pagans
LaShawn Barber has rerun
a piece from 2002 which has seen a couple of title changes since it's first posting.
“Tis the Season to be Pagans,” “Why Black Christians Shouldn’t Celebrate Kwanzaa,” and now “Kwanzaa is for Pagans.” The underlying point of the piece is that all Christians need to be careful with spiritualized “celebrations” lest they become caught up with occultic and other forbidden doctrines.
I certainly understand the desire to celebrate the African culture for those who find themselves cloaked in it, but the larger question that I ask, is as opposed to celebrating a "holiday" that is no less manufactured than Hallmark and American Greetings' "Grandparents' Day" or "Boss' Day," why not actually do the research and celebrate a day in common with the peoples of the African cultures that you might hope to emulate?
Ah, but it's politically incorrect to even question the motives of those who manufactured Kwanzaa as a "holiday" to be celebrated -- and especially celebrated as a so-called alternative to Christmas.
Feh.
Posted by: mhking at
03:56 AM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 178 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Gotta love manufactured holidays.
Christmas for example.
Posted by: Nick Saunders at December 20, 2004 10:00 AM (vnSex)
2
I don't go attacking your religion or lack of it, and you don't go attacking mine. Deal?
Posted by: Michael at December 20, 2004 11:06 AM (CO/Uo)
3
Of course ALL holidays are "manufactured." Just as the Julian calendar is "manufacured." The difference between Christmas, Easter, and Kwanzaa is that the former two have historically religious roots and the latter was contrived by a religion-bereft borderline criminal to compete head-to-head with those religious holidays. Even the name of "Kwanzaa" is a joke, as it is in a language of a people who were not involved in the North American slave trade. Multi-culti relativists such as Nick worship anything that might bring the dominance of Western superiority to an end.
Posted by: skh at December 20, 2004 02:10 PM (0xwoN)
4
Michael, your comment is actually one of the most reasonable I've seen on the topic.
Posted by: DarkStar at December 20, 2004 03:54 PM (cnw1A)
5
Michael,
"Nick" may have been making the pro forma argument that the date of Christmas is dubious. To wit
*:"The Gospels. Concerning the date of Christ's birth the Gospels give no help; upon their data contradictory arguments are based."
Posted by: mal-3 at December 20, 2004 08:33 PM (FqXrD)
Posted by: mal-3 at December 20, 2004 08:36 PM (FqXrD)
7
But...
Ah, but it's politically incorrect to even question the motives of those who manufactured Kwanzaa as a "holiday" to be celebrated -- and especially celebrated as a so-called alternative to Christmas.
That's a cop out and wrong. It's not an alternative. Some who do it, do both, and make Christianity part of Kwanzaa.
Posted by: DarkStar at December 21, 2004 04:05 AM (cnw1A)
8
It's not an alternative. Some who do it, do both...
The implication of the word "some" is that
most who celebrate Kwanzaa
do regard it as an alternative.
Posted by: McGehee at December 21, 2004 05:45 AM (S504z)
9
Actually, when I wrote
some, it was because I can't write all, or most, because I have no idea what proportion of people who celebrate Kwanzaa do both.
Based on my cirle, I could very few, less than 5%, actually practice Kwanzaa. But, again, I have no data to back it up.
I actually think more is being made of this than warrants it. In that context, I wonder why so much is made of it.
Posted by: DarkStar at December 21, 2004 08:29 AM (cnw1A)
10
I was referring to the date. I have no problem with christmas my family celebrates it. (well the mid winter holiday but we use the term christmas)
SKH. I am a cultural relativist to a point. I have no idea wht kwanzaa is nor do I particularly give a monkeys. I also do not desire the downfall of the west I happen to like my culture. i do dislike idiots who cannot make a leap of faith to accepting there may not be cultural absolutes.
Marry Christmas by the way Michael.
Posted by: Nick Saunders at December 21, 2004 01:17 PM (vnSex)
11
Nick, I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not. If you don't know what Kwanzaa is, then why do you feel compelled to comment on criticism of it? If some asshat manufactured a holiday honoring Jack the Ripper, would you scurry to defend it in the face of opposition? Are you explicitly saying that there are no cultural absolutes? If so, then you need to dismiss the "teachings" of your sociology and anthropology classes and explore life a bit longer.
Properly spelled, that would be, "Merry Christmas." Your misspelling almost convinces me that you are being insulting, instead of being tolerant.
Posted by: skh at December 21, 2004 08:57 PM (0xwoN)
12
SKH.
1. I noticed a comment by whoever the black leader was denouncing it and the comment that it was created in the 1970s and set at a time when people would be celebrating anyway. That is exactly what happened with christmas. It was set at the same time as the pagan midwinter solstice despite all historical evidence suggesting Jesus (and i do believe he existed) was NOT born December 25th or even close to it. September/October is the most commonly recognised timespan as far as history goes. That said I like Christmas where it is. Would be no fun in September/October.
2. I don't study anthropology or sociology. I did do Philosophy which is where I came across relativism. Answer these if you can.
A. If there ARE cultural absolutes (and things like murder doesn't count here) ie one culture is right and the other wrong, on what is this based?
B. How does one KNOW ther culture is right?
3. No I would not commemorate Jack the Ripper. When is your KKK holiday then? when will you be celebrating Lyndie England and Abu Grahib?
4. Merry Christmas was genuine I hope he enjoys the holidays.
5. Honour has a U in it.
Posted by: Nick Saunders at December 22, 2004 12:16 AM (vnSex)
13
Nick, here is what the "founder" of Kwanzaa said in 1978 concerning Kwanzaa: "People think it's African, but it's not. I came up with Kwanzaa because black people in this country wouldn't celebrate it if they knew it was American. Also, I put it around Christmas because I knew that's when a lot of bloods (blacks) would be partying." Can you see why some people have a problem with this?
Concerning cultural absolutes, if you have doubts then perhaps it wasn't the philosophy, maybe your liberal mindset is to blame. To wit, the overwhelming majority of Arabs view women as inferior to their favorite livestock. Women can be killed for looking at other men, stoned or executed for being raped, and have no legal remedies under Islamic law. What do I base a blanket denouncement of their culture on? Common sense and decency. Can you honestly say that Arabs are correct in this behavior? The same can be said of much of African culture, which is largely Islamic. The concept of human life and human dignity may be a Western one, but I don't think that it is cultural conceit for me to believe that their culture is shitty in their treatment of womenfolk.
Your point #3: Disregarding your flaccid attempt to label me as a racist with your KKK jibe, you make my point for me. You aren't inclined to celebrate a manufactured holiday elevating Jack the Ripper to celebrity status, nor will I celebrate or even recognize a "holiday" began by a bigotted, violent criminal. Karenga himself shows disdain for the sheeple who have adopted his faux-African holiday...on this point, I agree with him.
Posted by: skh at December 22, 2004 04:28 AM (0xwoN)
14
SKH.
I don't happen to believe that arabs are right in their treatment of women. Perhaps the question I asked should have been.
If you were brought up in a culture where it was acceptable to treat women as worse than livestock would you still hold the views you do today?
As the answer is i suspect no (no judgement just what i think is more likely) can you still claim our culture is the right one. It is about upbringing and socialisation. You and I and most people in the western world believe certain things largely because we live in this culture. The reason i think there are not cultural absolutes si that we are not all brought up in the same place in the same culture. we believe our culture is right because we live within it. The same is true of mr joe blogs in riyadh or damascus.
I happen to dislike the treatment arab nations give women but don't forget we weren't much better 600 years ago.
Anyway gotta go uni house is having xmas dinner and present giving before I go home for christmas. have a merry christmas and a good new year.
Posted by: Nick Saunders at December 22, 2004 08:41 AM (vnSex)
15
Nick --
I didn't take it personally, but thanks for the heads up anyhow.
Merry Christmas to you and yours...
And Happy New Year, too!
Posted by: Michael at December 22, 2004 08:47 AM (CO/Uo)
16
Let's just agree to disagree for right now, Nick. You are busy, I have about 17 30-foot strands of Christmas lights acting goofy around my eaves and hedgerows that are about to drive me nucking futz. I've got to get up early and figger out why the reds and oranges aren't blinking but the blues and greens are. On top of that, my 8-foot tall Frosty the Snowman has developed a marked lean to the left that will entail unhooking the electricity to his inflator and light. All in all, I have my day tomorrow filled with the joy of making my girlfriend joyous. Merry Christmas to you and Michael.
Posted by: skh at December 22, 2004 07:08 PM (0xwoN)
17
Sounds fair to me. The joys of two sisters. They do the decorating long before I get home.
Posted by: Nick Saunders at December 23, 2004 05:53 AM (mxLf2)
18
ARGGH! Frosty is back on an even keel, but those dadgum Wal-Mart lights need to be sent back to China on the nose cone of a Tomahawk. AARGGHH!!! It's a mystery why half of 'em won't light. I suggested taking a hammer to the blues and greens, but the gal won't agree. I'm about to bust some hypothesis tests on her to demonstrate why this is a conspiracy to make me insane. Mneh.
Posted by: skh at December 23, 2004 07:36 PM (0xwoN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 18, 2004
My age is now the ultimate answer to everything
...at least to those of us
Hitchhiker's Guide fans...
Thanks to those who have sent greetings.
Posted by: mhking at
02:04 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 34 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Happy 42nd! at least you aren't saying "so long, and thanks for all the fish."
Posted by: Barry at December 18, 2004 06:00 PM (abkxs)
2
Congratulations and many more!
Posted by: Chap at December 18, 2004 07:31 PM (wp4/x)
Posted by: McGehee at December 19, 2004 05:37 AM (S504z)
4
Happy day and knowing the answer to "the question", is a good thing. But with this decidedly British bent to things...are we to expect Monty Python words of wisdom to pop up unexpectedly? Will Benny Hill's (or better yet the Hill's Angels) zany antics add a little spice to a bit of stoic news?
Anyhow hope you had a festive day.
Posted by: Guy S. at December 19, 2004 12:06 PM (pa0t/)
5
Congrats. I would send you a pan-galactic-gargle-blaster, if I had the wherewithal to do it.
Posted by: King of Fools at December 20, 2004 05:04 AM (ktIW6)
Posted by: Pious Agnostic at December 20, 2004 10:50 AM (7dkzi)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 17, 2004
The Peterson case is over, so here's the "next big Court TV case"
In Gwinnett County, just northeast of Atlanta, Jennifer Corbin was found dead with a gunshot in her head on December 4. The gun used was beside her in the bed where her 7 year-old son found her. The son, the Corbin's oldest, said that he thought his father, Dacula, GA, dentist Dr. Barton Corbin, had shot his mother.
As the investigation continues in this tragic death, a number of circumstances are coming to light.
First off, according to Jennifer's sister, Jennifer had filed for divorce from her husband on November 29.
Jennifer Corbin, a 39-year-old mother of two boys and a pre-school teacher, tried to file a criminal complaint with Gwinnett police against her husband, Dr. Barton Corbin, on December 1, according to her sister, Heather Tierney.Tierney says Jennifer told her she bought her own cell phone after her husband, a dentist in Dacula, Ga., filed for divorce on November 29. Jennifer said her husband eventually found out about it.
On Dec. 1, Jennifer apparently walked into a room of their house in Dacula to find the contents of her purse scattered across the floor and her phone missing, according to Tierney. Jennifer decided to confront Dr. Corbin and went to another room of the house, where he'd moved his belongings.
Tierney said that when Jennifer demanded her husband give her back her cell phone, he refused and tore out of the house wearing nothing but his bath towel.
When he got into a car and tried to drive away, Jennifer got behind the car, hoping to delay him long enough to get her phone back, Tierney said. Dr. Corbin wouldnÂ’t stop and ended up running over one of JenniferÂ’s feet.
And as if this wasn't bad enough, an even more bizarre coincidence is in play in this case.
Fourteen years ago, Dolly Hearn was found dead of a single gunshot wound to the head, the gun used, found in her lap.
Dolly was a dentistry student in Augusta, GA, and had reportedly tried to break up with her boyfriend, a fellow student. She was afraid of the boyfriend, and had told friends that he was borderline violent.
Dolly hoped that he'd just graduate and move on with his life, leaving her alone.
A few days later, she was dead.
The boyfriend's name: Barton Corbin.
Hearn had been dating Corbin, a fellow dentistry student at the Medical College of Georgia. She was breaking up with him before her death.In the months before her death, someone broke into her apartment, and another time someone vandalized her car.
Hearn suspected Corbin in the incidents and so did detectives.
Asked if Hearn was afraid of Corbin and if she was trying to get away from him, Richard County Sheriff’s Sgt. Scott Pebbles, the lead detective in the Hearn investigation, said, “You know I can’t speak for what she felt inside. I can only tell you that the police reports had been filed. Those were obviously a matter of public record and there were obviusly some issues between the two.”
Detectives questioned Corbin after HearnÂ’s death but the case languished until Dec. 4 this year when CorbinÂ’s wife died exactly the same way.
That case may be reopened as a result of the Gwinnett County case. The grand jury looking into the Gwinnett case is not due to meet again until after the first of the year.
Once the case gets a little more traction -- and considering that the Michael Jackson case won't heat up until at least the end of January to the beginning of February, look for this one to show up there and on the voyeuristic court shows (Fox's Greta VanSusteren and others) up and down the dial.
Posted by: mhking at
10:59 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 642 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Swiped, with attribution for my blog. And it appears the email address you have listed is not functioning.
Posted by: theco at December 19, 2004 11:16 AM (GGsPW)
Posted by: Radio Guy at December 19, 2004 11:38 AM (UzuSp)
3
I think the Missouri woman who was murdered and had her baby ripped from her body is probably your next big Court TV case.
Posted by: Gib at December 20, 2004 03:35 AM (PsC2M)
4
I think the article you've captioned may have been a little confusing. Jennifer Corbin did not file for divorce first. The article reads that "Tierney says Jennifer told her she bought her own cell phone after her husband, a dentist in Dacula, GA., filed for divorce on Nov. 29. Jennifer said her husband eventually found out about it." Jennifer bought the cell phone after her husband filed for divorce and it's the cell phone that was eventually discovered.
Gwinnett County Court records show ONE filing naming Barton Corbin as the Plaintiff and Jennifer Corbin as the Defendant.
Posted by: CKBME at December 21, 2004 11:48 AM (w/jqY)
5
I lived in Washington Ga at the time of Dolly's death,it was her childhood home and where her father was one of the only dentists. No one there ever believed Dolly took her own life.
Posted by: susan at December 22, 2004 11:54 AM (XtnZr)
6
Great Article, I enjoyed reading all the details. My thoughts and prayers go out to this family.
Posted by: Robin at December 22, 2004 04:47 PM (c73br)
7
I would like to inquire, which may lead to an interesting story: How many suicide
cases are actual murder cases?
One of the oldest forms of death that can often be manipulated to suit a killer, suicide.
So many families have questioned or protested the death of those they love. From
self inflicted stabbings, hangings, gunshots, and so forth, can all be distorted by a
murderer.
Whose to know the truth of a person's death, if it's not a true suicide? Just as the
14 year-old case in Augusta.
Just as in this situation, the newly release suspense novel, Won't Be Denied, threads
on the same MO as the Gwinnett dentist. The main character seeks to make a way
to commit a crime that misleads the police as a sign of suicide.
How prevalent are murders portrayed as suicides?
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
C.F. Jackson
www.cfjackson.us
Posted by: C.F. Jackson at December 23, 2004 07:34 AM (OPflN)
8
The cases of Dolly Hearn and Jennifer Corbin are
apparent to any one absolutely alike. Was it providence that Jennifer had to die in order for Dolly's case to be brought into the limelight? If
so,may justice prevail. I feel such sorrow for both families and was very heartened to hear that
members of Dolly's family attended Jennifer's funeral and that they are there for each other. I imagine that what they could tell each other and probably did about Dr Corbin was identical in the way these women were treated before their deaths. I saw Dolly's brother on TV for the first time tonight and could not begin to fathom what he and the rest of Dolly's family have went through and felt these past 14 years. How hurtful it must have been to lose this beautiful young woman and never have closure or the killer when even the law suspected him all those years.
I do resent highly the fact that Dr.Corbin,just because he is a Dr.,did not have to do the things that a person of lesser means would have to go through with the law when his wife is found shot dead. The rest of us peons would have been arrested if not that day then a lot sooner than Corbin was. He got himself all lawyered up and even had his lawyer answering his door to his residence.If it is proven by law that he did these 2 murders,I hope he gets his just desserts. How smug he must have felt all these years when he was never arrested for Dolly's murder. My heart goes out to the Hearn family and the Corbin family. God Bless them all.
Posted by: Beverly Hawkins at December 23, 2004 01:35 PM (yYgeh)
9
I live in Gwinnett and have seen the guy around at a few bars. There's a huge scientology movement here that no one seems to want to talk about.I wonder if he had any connections to W.I.S.E. They should search his home and computers for LRH literature. There was another shooter/stalking case with similarities (to the 1990 case) a couple weks ago involving a mail order russian bride. Place is going to hell faster than Clearwater.
Posted by: mat at December 23, 2004 03:38 PM (PPcsx)
10
Mat-
Could you elaborate? I'd reallylike to know more about WISE.
Kind Regards,
Heather
Posted by: Heather at December 26, 2004 03:32 PM (6A8oN)
11
Does anyone know Barton Corbin's whereabouts after the Hearn death, leaving Augusta, and prior to meeting his deceased wife????
Posted by: AH at December 27, 2004 09:12 AM (OYEUv)
12
How sad that a man thinks he can get away with this..twice. And how sad that he did. The police didn't do enough to protect the wife after he ran over her foot. It's that assault with a deadly weapon? My daughter asked me a week ago why women don't get away from abusive men. I told her they may try, but the police don't do much to help or protect them. I know from personal experience. The best way is to arm yourself and hope the psycho doesn't catch you off guard
Posted by: Mellisa at January 13, 2005 03:17 PM (UQbQF)
13
Could you elaborate? I'd too really would like to know more about wise
Posted by: Mail order brides at February 09, 2005 11:40 PM (icx4E)
14
W.I.S.E. = World Institute of Scientology Enterprises.
Many businesses and/or Associatons have religious backing. For example, we're all familiar with the Salvation Army, which is a Christian Church and a registered charity. Similarly, the Church of Scientology backs certain organizations. A quick google search found that Narconon (Narcotics Anonymous) and the Citizen's Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) are backed by Scientology, as are I'm sure, many others.
But I'm not sure what Scientology has to do with the article.
Posted by: julie at September 18, 2005 06:35 PM (kJcST)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
PA black minister protests "inequity" in Sunday liquor sales
Philadelphia area minister Jesse W. Brown
penned a letter to hislocal newspaper pointing out that the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board decided to have some urban package stores open on Sunday, while "state stores" in rural communities -- especially those with more conservative (of course this being code for "white") populations -- would be closed Sundays.
According to Jonathan Newman, Chairperson of the Liquor Control Board (LCB), some communities in the state would not be forced to accept the Sunday sales. "We have some stores in rural pockets where it wouldn't work because of the religious, conservative beliefs," Newman said.
As an African American pastor in an urban community who has fought for years against the intrusion of liquor sales in our neighborhoods, I take great offense at Mr. Newman's statement, made in a city with population that is just 2.6 percent African American. The statement made it very clear that this Administration is far more concerned about religious beliefs of Whites than those of Black Pennsylvanians.
Hmm... Let's see. urban area where enough sales can be made on Sundays to justify the salary of the workers there, versus rural area where the amount of sales does
not offset or justify the salary of the employees who would work Sunday.
Discrimination?
I don't think so!
More like sound business practice!
But then again, this is coming from a resident of a state that is dry Sundays (gotta love Georgia, right?), and would much rather be able to buy booze on Sunday morning after church while doing my regular grocery shopping as opposed to making a special trip Saturday night.
Posted by: mhking at
09:50 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 285 words, total size 2 kb.
The 2005 Dead Pool - my "short list"
OK. This year, I'm going to enter the
Dead Pool.
I missed it last year, and kicked myself for doing so.
For those of you who see this as morbid, keep in mind that as a former reporter and talk show host, I developed this sick gallows humor over the years -- working for CNN (even though it was in Sports) didn't help any; if anything, it sharpened it a bit.
Anyhow, here's my list of fifteen:
Michael Jackson -- I really think he'll do himself in before the end of next year. IMO, the trial will end up getting to him, especially as some of the really sick stuff starts to come out.Keith Richards -- He already looks like he's been embalmed, why not finish the job?Gerald Ford -- Notice that you haven't seen ol' Gerry lately -- not even at the unveiling of Bubba's Presidential Double-Wide last month.Pope John Paul II -- The Vatican (and all the networks) has been getting ready for this for hte past several years. Nothing cynical to say here; just looking at the Holy Writing on the Wall.Abe Vigoda -- I didn't realize he was still alive! I remember Fish from Barney Miller; wasn't he old then!?Robert "Sheets" Byrd -- Couldn't happen to a nicer klansman-turned-moonbat.Courtney Love -- Why isn't she dead already!? I'm convinced that her internal gas tank is blinking "empty" (along with what passes for her brain), it just hasn't coughed it's last yet.Osama Bin Laden -- OK, I'll finally admit that Osama Yo Mama is still alive, but he can't run from the eternal celestial 7-11 forever.Pervez Musharaf -- I really think some Islamakazi is gonna nail Pakistan's president. It's not like they haven't been trying.Kim Jong-Il -- Headline: "Crazy dictator pushes starving subjects too far, subjects bite back." 'Nuff said.Abu Al-Zarqawi -- With every tom, dick & harry in Iraq looking for this goon, someone's gonna nail him. Soon.Richard Pryor -- A hard life and multiple schlerosis have taken their toll on poor Rich. James Doohan -- Scotty has made his last personal appearance, and dementia is setting in. I don't think he can engineer his way out of eternity.Ted "Jabba the Drunk" Kennedy -- Pickled liver, pickled brain, pickled Ted.William Rehnquist -- Once he steps down from the Bench, he won't be long.
There are at least two others I'd love to add as bonus picks if I could:
Rosa Parks, who sadly is suffering from dementia also;
Ariel Sharon, who is bigger'n I am, but is ducking and dodging folks trying to kill him on a daily basis.
If you want to join the pool, you've got until the stroke of midnight on New Year's Eve to pick 15 of your own and get 'em in. Laurence has all the rules over at The Dead Pool, as well as a list of prizes for the taking.
Posted by: mhking at
07:12 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 494 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Oh, man, I used to do that stuff, it was called the Ghoul Pool back then. Tried to stop being so morbid. Think I quit when Madelyn Kahn died, I took it too personally. I would likely bet on Fidel Castro dying soon. At least we can hope.
Posted by: Peggy Snow Cahill at December 17, 2004 10:45 AM (uRjq1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 16, 2004
Washington Nationals close store; begin refunding ticket monies
The Washington Nationals, after being dealt a significant blow by the DC City Council with regard to construction of a new stadium, shuttered the one memorabilia store they had opened, and
began refunding money paid for season tickets today.
Major League Baseball has told its vendor to suspend sales of the items indefinitely. The temporary Washington Nationals store set up near RFK Stadium is now closed.The team has also suspended the hiring of front office and support personnel. Major league Baseball officials have said the Expo's baseball operations will continue but efforts to sell sponsorships. arrange broadcast deals and conduct other marketing efforts are all on hold.
Washington Mayor Anthony Williams was quoted as saying that the deal would have to be fixed within the next two weeks if it could be at all.
It is unclear whether the Washington Nationals/Montreal Expos will play this season in Washington, Montreal or some other city.
Posted by: mhking at
05:22 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 169 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Seems like it would be wise to snatch up all the memorablia you can get your hands on. Definite collectors items.
Posted by: King of Fools at December 16, 2004 05:49 AM (ktIW6)
2
That didn't take long. The jerseys linked to below are now out of stock. You better get a
hat while you can.
Posted by: Keith at December 16, 2004 02:35 PM (DrZwK)
3
I understand the key to the failure was the city council's voting to not spend a beaucoup of public funds on it. Interesting.
Posted by: Chap at December 16, 2004 10:27 PM (wp4/x)
4
How about moving them to the Dominican, to cut down on the commute of MLB's shortstops?
Or, to New York. We once had three teams--and maybe by splitting the market a bit it will help even out resources. Besides, even with Pedro, the Mets are still going to be a good AAA team, and I'd like watch some Major League baseball this year!
Posted by: Tony Iovino at December 17, 2004 02:25 AM (0eViP)
5
Meanwhile, we can all get to work on that time machine, which we can use to go back in time and torment that owner of the Senates team who stole it from us. :-((
Posted by: Lola at December 17, 2004 05:55 AM (V1eTE)
6
Chap, that is correct. The mayor told MLB the city would happily build a stadium. One of the councilmembers (Kropp, who I normally wouldn't give the time of day to) inserted language at the 11th hour stating 50% had to be paid by private funds. With no time to get that funding before the deadline at the end of the year ran out, there probably won't be a stadium deal at end-fo-year. I happen to agree with Kropp; the mayor can say all he wants about how much money it'll bring into DC but in the past it's shown to be a bust. Take a look at Pittsburgh: shiny new stadium and the city is barely solvent because of the funds they paid, but at least they kept their teams! DC is in a bitch of a lot worse shape than the Pitt was. Believe you me.
I bought my father-in-law a hat for Christmas online two days before the vote, and I hope it'll still get delivered.
On another note, does anyone get today's Day by Day (Ukraine elections and soup)?
Posted by: LCVRWC at December 17, 2004 06:38 AM (L3qPK)
Posted by: Laurence Simon at December 17, 2004 06:41 AM (uBCxH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Chevy Chase unloads expletive-laden diatribe against Bush
Chevy Chase, who still can't seem to get his career back on track,
unloaded on President Bush with both barrels Tuesday night at an awards ceremony he hosted for moonbat group People for the American Way at Washington's Kennedy Center.
Chase unloaded on the President near the end of the event. His tirade left most of the moonbats there speechless.
Chase took the stage a final time and unleashed a rant against President Bush that stunned the crowd. He deployed the four-letter word that got Vice President Cheney in hot water, using it as a noun. Chase called the prez a "dumb [expletive]." He also used it as an adjective, assuring the audience, "I'm no [expletive] clown either. . . . This guy started a jihad."Chase also said: "This guy in office is an uneducated, real lying schmuck . . . and we still couldn't beat him with a bore like Kerry."
People for the American Way distanced itself yesterday from the actor's rant. "Chevy Chase's improvised remarks caught everyone off guard, and were inappropriate and offensive," Ralph Neas, the liberal advocacy group's president, said in a statement. "It was not what I would have said, and certainly not the language People for the American Way would ever use in discussing any president of the United States."
Founder Norman Lear agreed, telling us: "I thought it was utterly untoward, obviously unexpected and unscripted and all that stuff. And, uh -- it was Chevy Chase. He'll live with it, I won't."
Sen. Tom Daschle, the former minority leader, looked taken aback when he went on directly after Chase. His opening line: "I've had to follow a lot of speakers, but -- "
Chase ducked out of the ceremony immediately after that, and did not come back out for an encore. Chase didn't talk to the press afterward either.
(More coverage from
Wizbang & others)
Posted by: mhking at
04:50 AM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 325 words, total size 2 kb.
1
When will these pinhead celebrities realize that Bush-bashing isn't funny anymore?
[
Industrial Waste]
Posted by: Penn at December 16, 2004 06:30 AM (UaigI)
2
Where'd they get the idea it ever was?
Posted by: McGehee at December 16, 2004 07:26 AM (S504z)
3
it the uneducated people of the world that have a problem with people speaking out... this country is in a slide a big slide and bush is bulldozing it into the ocean rapidly wakeup
Posted by: yi[ppee at December 18, 2004 02:37 AM (bjzpm)
4
This is certainly no time to stop attacking Monkey Boy!....He is our servant and he's doing a shitty job.We should point that out loudly and regularly. Rail on Chevy..rail on!
Posted by: Neochondriac at December 18, 2004 08:25 AM (+7VNs)
5
Bush-bashing? Don't make me laugh. Say you go to Jack-in-the-Box and get food poisoning, would you be guilty of bashing if you complain about your turd-in-the-box? What I think is funny is how liberals get all shocked when someone comes and lays it on the line. Now Chevy won't get invited to these 'polite society' gatherings. Boohoo. The moderates on the right and the left are killing this country.
Posted by: disgusted at December 18, 2004 10:04 AM (lV4fW)
6
Chevy is a dopey washed-up nothing of a man. He is the "f*ck" for calling a standing president names like this. What a turd this guy has become since his "funny days" on SNL and his "Vacation" films. I want him to go away now. Chevy "not-funny-anymore" Chase, you've officially become a nuisance.
Posted by: Curt at December 18, 2004 10:06 AM (NuM8/)
7
Kick ass shit. Finally someone in Hollywood got enough balls to come out and state the obvious.
Posted by: Kick Ass at December 18, 2004 08:51 PM (4hrG0)
8
Wow, we have someone comparing Bush basing with getting bad food as if the two directly relate somehow. Another who calls him Monkey Boy as if he could do better and a guy who begins with an "it the uneducated".
You respect the office if not the man but that has been lost on the last couple of "me" generation babies who have had everything handed to them. Grow up you meandering whimps, the war in Iraq sucks but we are there. Support the troops, show disdain for our Government in a productive way like it says in the Consitution and tell the wackos like Franken, Chase and Moore to move to France where they belong.
Posted by: Viking at December 19, 2004 01:22 PM (5D1a3)
9
It's not just celebrities who feel this strongly about this president, they are just the only ones who get the news coverage. Strong words like F*** are used to convey strong feelings. I don't see Bush-bashing as much as I see another frustrated American watching his country going backwards instead of forwards at the hands of a man who has continuously mislead his people. I believe that we should stand behind our president (whoever he may be), but not until he stands up for the people instead of himself and his own ideas of what is right and wrong.
Posted by: tt at December 20, 2004 11:32 AM (Dm20C)
10
It cracks me up with professional comedians bitch about Bush being an uneducated shmuck.
Thanks, Professor Chase.
Oh well, I still love "Christmas Vacation."
Posted by: Julie Anne Fidler at December 21, 2004 08:25 AM (ywZa8)
11
Why does it have to be Chase sucks. Bush is an uneducated jerk, who has got us in a war which looks like a modern day version of the crusades. Bush even was so stupid he wanted to call it the crusade against terriosm. Maybe Chase just has the brain enough to see what is going on and felt he could not hold it in. People need to remeber 49% of us who voted did not vote for Bush. I wish more people would speak their mind about the crap being done in the name of democracy.
Posted by: Delana at December 21, 2004 08:22 PM (ALYVl)
12
Hey Chevy! How about another Euro Vacation This time make it One Way & Permanent! I haven't heard crap from this dead-beat comediam for a long time until this! This Haz-Bin Comedian is trying to re-kindle his career! "I'm Chevy Chase and you're NOT!" Well, thank god for that! Because if i was Chevy Chase i'd hang myself and put an end to this misery called Chevy Chase! Where's Chevy Now! Back under that Rock! Like BinLaden! Stay There Looser! I don't give a flying F***K about you! Never did! Never Will!
Posted by: P.S. Perez at January 02, 2005 12:21 AM (6krEN)
13
Chevy is not the one responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent Iraqis in this gratuitous war now is he?
Posted by: jc at January 04, 2005 03:09 PM (wqZp0)
14
No, I believe the fault for that belongs to the man our forces yanked out of a rat hole more than a year ago.
Ah, but you don't want to hear about that, do you?
Posted by: Michael at January 04, 2005 04:15 PM (bJ0qq)
Posted by: Liberals Are Turds at June 07, 2005 09:07 PM (SN1Yv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Merry Christmas condition RED!
The ACLU and the "politcally correct" would have us dump the phrase "Merry Christmas" in favor of whatever else they can come up with, usually "Happy Holidays." And while I would certainly wish "Happy Holidays" upon everyone to encompass folks who don't celebrate Christmas (as with the just ended Hannukah holidays -- Happy belated Hannukah to those of you who celebrate it), I will not be bullied into downplaying my celebration of the birth of my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
And the ACLU can take a flying leap.
Posted by: mhking at
04:35 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 101 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: έχω ζωη at December 16, 2004 04:58 AM (K+h36)
2
The ACLU That Stole Christmas
By Separation of Church and State
Posted by: Penn at December 16, 2004 06:32 AM (UaigI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 15, 2004
British scientists whine about global warming (yeah, right!)
British Environment Minister Elliot Morley predicted that the notion of a White Christmas for England (and by extension, the middle lattitudes) is 65 percent less likely over the next 50 years.
Norman Baker, the British Parliament's Liberal Democrat environment spokesman, summed up the analysis this way: "Britons will soon be left with only dreams of a white Christmas, as the chances of it actually happening become more remote."Despite the fact that London has experienced only six white Christmases in the past 45 years, Baker said any future lack of snow could be blamed on only one factor. "Global warming is the main reason for this shift in seasonal weather and is responsible for changing the world as we know it," Baker said.
Baker believes the analysis should prompt a call to action on climate change.
"It is not only Christmas that will be affected. In the New Year we can expect more of the extreme weather, floods and gales suffered across the Continent this year. This is a global issue, but the government needs to make reducing greenhouse gases one of its top New Year's resolutions," Baker said.
Global warming. Feh.
This morning's low here in Atlanta? 18 degrees. And of course, it was even colder out away from the city, and up toward the North Georgia Mountains.
It's 42 this afternoon here, and we're expecting an even colder blast early next week, and the weatherman actually mentioned a possibility of snow for that timeframe.
Posted by: mhking at
09:02 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 260 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The next time some whiny tree-hugging hippy starts blathering about global warming, calmly hand them this speech from Michael Chrichton, and stand back as their head explodes....
http://www.crichton-official.com/speeches/speeches_quote05.html
Posted by: Tman at December 15, 2004 11:19 AM (Fho+X)
2
Wow. I stumbled on this site by accident while researching a paper. I read this post, and at first, I was sure I was misunderstanding you, because I couldn't believe there were actually still people around who weren't aware global warming is real.
I am not a religious person. I do not think nature is wonderful, I am not a "Tree-hugger", I am sure Eden never existed. As someone interested in science, I am simply in concurrence with the vast majority of the scientific community who are trying to give warnings concerning the existence of global warming. There is proof. It is that simple. I am sorry you don't see it, really.
http://www.nrdc.org/media/pressreleases/041108.asp
http://www.mng.org.uk/green_house/threat/threat6.htm
mountain glaciers the world over are receding
the Arctic ice pack has lost about 40% of its thickness over the past four decades
the global sea level is rising about three times faster over the past 100 years compared to the previous 3,000 years
there are a growing number of studies that show plants and animals changing their range and behavior in response to shifts in climate
The mainstream scientific consensus on global warming is becoming clearer every day: changes in our climate are real and they are underway. Now.
I'm probably not going to convince you two. But I hope someone sees this, and goes out and decides for themselves.
Posted by: Lara at December 15, 2004 04:36 PM (giyEK)
3
Lara, yes, there are changes in the climate, underway, as we speak. A few things to keep in mind,
1. There always are changes in the climate.
2. One of the recorded climate changes that had the greatest effect in history took place during the late Middle Ages.
3. Climate changes are cyclical, and deducing the cause of the changes is extrememly difficult. Blaming global warming, for instance on carbon emmissions might not be good science since, for instance, the very large volcanic explosion of Aug. 26, 1883 in Krakatoa resulted in lower temperatures around the world
because of the ash particulate in the atmosphere, and you can't get more carbon emissions that that.
Meanwhile, here in Princeton, it's 28oF. Global warming, Feh, as Michael said.
Posted by: Fausta at December 16, 2004 04:10 AM (SXxna)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
For posterity's sake, here's the Nationals' home and away jerseys
The home and away jerseys are available for sale from the MLB shop (at a whopping $190 a pop), but at the rate this mess is progressing, they may only be collectors' items from a team that could have been.
Speculation is running rampant (though there is no confirmation anywhere) that Major League Baseball will pull out of DC entirely, and play games elsewhere during the 2005 season.
Posted by: mhking at
08:31 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 88 words, total size 1 kb.
Nationals may only be in DC one year
Thanks to an eleventh hour amendment to the stadium financing provision, the Washington Nationals (formerly Montreal Expos)
may be forced to leave the Nation's Capitol after next season.
DC City Council Chair Linda Cropp put a last-minute provision into play at a council meeting last night which would force the previously agreed-to publicly financed stadium be partially paid for with private financing.
Jack Evans, baseball's most passionate advocate on the council, said the provision could be a deal breaker."This gives baseball an out," he said. "Changing the agreement will then negate the agreement, and then Major League Baseball will go somewhere else."
Council Chair Linda Cropp offered the private-financing provision, saying it would be crucial for her support. She was considered the swing vote on the 13-member council.
Cropp said she was not satisfied with concessions offered by baseball that would have made the deal more financially palatable for the city. When the council gave its initial approval to the law on Nov. 30, it called for the city to issue $531 million in bonds to finance the plan.
"I have not seen the movement from Major League Baseball that I would have liked in the past two weeks," Cropp said. "My dream of dreams is that we will get enough private financing that the costs of building the stadium will be eliminated."
Cropp, rumored by some to be considering a run for Washington mayor, then entered the amendment, and then gave her vote to pass the bill, 7-6.
Of the various city proposals for the Nationals-used-to-be-Expos, Washington's proposal, which centered around a publicly financed stadium, appeared to be the best fit for the team.
Cropp's last minute Machiavellian tactics have put the other potential cities (Las Vegas, Portland, Norfolk, Monterrey, San Juan and Northern Virginia) back into play, not for this season, but for any future seasons.
I'm sure Baltimore Orioles owner Peter Angelos, the most vocal critic of the Nationals being allowed to play in Washington, is pretty happy with this development. Angelos insisted that a team playing in DC would siphon money away from his team and his own revenues.
As things stand today, the Nationals are expected to begin play April 4 in Philadelphia against the Phillies, and have a home opener scheduled for April 14 against the Arizona Diamondbacks.
UPDATE: The uniform unveiling set for 2:00 this afternoon has been cancelled. Could be a sign of things to come, or in DC's case, NOT to come, thanks to Cropps.
According to WTOP Radio, an announcement of the reason for the cancellation will come later today.
That's too bad. 33 years fans have been waiting for major league baseball in Washington, and thanks to one knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing moonbat, the hopes'll probably head down the drain.
Posted by: mhking at
05:30 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 481 words, total size 3 kb.
1
With the problems that D.C. has, is it wise that D.C. pay for a stadium that gives away naming rights and incoming coming from that, taxes small and medium local business while sparing "big business," and only "allows" D.C. to use the tax payer funded stadium about 5 times a year?
Posted by: DarkStar at December 15, 2004 03:44 PM (cnw1A)
2
At least Maryland payed for its stadiums by taxing lottery suckers, uhhh, players.
Posted by: DarkStar at December 15, 2004 03:45 PM (cnw1A)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 14, 2004
Moonbats using new website to choose stores that donated to Dems
Despondent liberals, desperate to isolate themselves from the remainder of the nation, have put together a website (
ChooseTheBlue.com) which discloses
what companies donated to the Kerry campaign and the Democratic National Committee this year as opposed to donating to the Bush campaign or the Republican National Committee.
Costco workers gave more to Democrats, for example, while Wal-Mart's preferred Republicans, according to campaign finance records. Donna Karan's people lean left. Fruit of the Loom's give to the right.For Ann and Bill Duvall, the site's creators, Nov. 3 brought great disappointment--and a call to action.
"We woke up that morning just really devastated and depressed, and in some ways I'm grateful that we came up with this idea because that's where we've been able to put our energy," Ann Duvall, 56, said.
Using information from the Federal Election Commission Web site and the Center for Responsive Politics site, www.opensecrets.org, the Duvalls give their fellow Democrats a gift that could keep on giving.
"If each American who voted for John Kerry spends $100 in 2005 on a blue company instead of a red company, we can move $5 billion away from Republican companies and add $5 billion to the income of companies who donate to Democrats," they say on the site.
Of course, conservatives can also use the site to determine where to better focus their shopping efforts as well.
Then there are those of us who just want the most bang for the buck. In which case, sites like this are useless.
UPDATE: Someone pointed out a second site that is geared toward disgruntled blue-staters, BuyBlue.Org, where you can find more information about how companies donated.
But like the aforementioned ChooseTheBlue.Com, conservatives can also use BuyBlue.Org to help govern their buying habits toward more conservatively donating stores and companies.
Posted by: mhking at
10:33 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 318 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Thanks for this post! You always have the most useful information. I went to that site, and was kinda surprised that most of the companies listed were in fact RED. I guess I shouldn't have been surprised, when Republicans are about laissez-faire free enterprise, while Democrats tend to restrict businesses to the point where they can no longer make a profit. Thanks again!
Posted by: Peggy Snow Cahill at December 14, 2004 01:34 PM (uRjq1)
2
This does not worry me at all.
Why?
Democrats are more likely to be on welfare or some dole program or forever locked into a dead end job because, like all good socialists, they can't operate on their own and need others to support them.
Republicans are more likely to be entrepreneurs, risk-takers, capitalists.
Guess who makes more money? Now guess who spends more money?
A list like this is priceless. I now know what stores to avoid. Go RED!
Posted by: Vilmar at December 15, 2004 03:28 AM (/EATg)
3
Hey Michael I had the very same Idea, about using that buy blue site for unintended purposes.
Posted by: spacemonkey at December 15, 2004 07:35 AM (DN55C)
4
Great - now I know which utility to buy
my electricity from. All I need to do is move.
By the way, I noticed that 100% of the donations from 'Seneca Hawk Tobacco Store' went to the Dems. Their site notes that "all cigarettes and tobacco products are shipped tax free to your home." Are people who do business without having to collect and pay sales taxes allowed to give money to political campaigns? Just a thought.
Posted by: Ira at December 15, 2004 03:07 PM (QMYHs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Ayatollah-Aid in Dallas!?
Heads up, Texas-folk and take a gander
at this.
I've never heard of this outfit, but I'm willing to bet that supporting US troops is not on the agenda.
Posted by: mhking at
09:28 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
108kb generated in CPU 0.0504, elapsed 0.4633 seconds.
54 queries taking 0.4354 seconds, 213 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.