May 31, 2004
Happy Memorial Day
Remember that Freedom is not Free.
The quote here has even greater meaning for me; General Stark is a distant ancestor of mine, by way of the Wilkinson family.
I'm part of the "woodpile."
Posted by: mhking at
01:34 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Eh, woodpile or not, thats a fine bloodline to hail from. and remember, blood flows red on both sides of that ol' woodpile Michael.
God bless, and happy Memorial Day
Posted by: Pudge at May 31, 2004 03:16 PM (ipMUD)
2
There are lines of McGehee cousins who came about in much that same way, but they're not part of the "woodpile" -- they're part of the family.
Posted by: McGehee at June 01, 2004 01:33 AM (lGoQn)
3
Nice to see that the old guy's fighting spirit didn't die with him Mike. ;-)
Posted by: Mike Jericho at June 01, 2004 03:36 AM (mo0Ob)
4
There are lines of cousins ​​who came to the point that McGehee same way, but are not part of the "woodpile" - are part of the family.
leather Jackets
Posted by: Sarah at March 29, 2011 01:05 AM (qAa6o)
Posted by: JournauxFrancais at October 13, 2011 11:34 AM (nS/Bv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Portland State prof offers "Post Traumatic Slave Disorder" as reason for murder
America's courts are filled with
shady shrinks paid by sleazy shysters ready to spout off any convenient theory for the bad behavior of pathetic people.
Add a new theory to the list: "Post Traumatic Slave Disorder."
Joy DeGruy-Leary, an assistant professor in the Portland State University Graduate School of Social Work put forward the theory, which is being used in the murder case of Isaac Cortez Bynum.
Bynum is charged with the beating death of his two year-old son Ryshawn last June. Bynum's lawyer, Randall Vogt, claims that suffering by African Americans at the hands of slave owners is to blame for little Ryshawn's death, not Isaac Bynum.
The theory is not accepted by the courts, nor by psychologists as a verifiable disorder. But a little thing like that won't dissuade DeGruy-Leary.
DeGruy-Leary testified this month in Washington County Circuit Court that African Americans today are affected by past centuries of U.S. slavery because the original slaves were never treated for the trauma of losing their homes; seeing relatives whipped, raped and killed; and being subjugated by whites.Because African Americans as a class never got a chance to heal and today still face racism, oppression and societal inequality, they suffer from multigenerational trauma, says DeGruy-Leary, who is African American. Self-destructive, violent or aggressive behavior often results, she says.
"Post traumatic slave syndrome is rather unique; it's not that everybody has it," DeGruy-Leary testified. "If you are African American and you are living in America, you have been impacted."
Washington County Circuit Judge Nancy W. Campbell recently threw out DeGruy-Leary's pretrial testimony, based on lack of empirical evidence that the condition even exists. However, Judge Campbell says that she may reconsider the defense, if the lawyer can show the slave theory is an accepted mental disorder with a valid scientific basis and specifically applies to this case.
DeGruy-Leary said she thinks post traumatic slave syndrome can be proven scientifically once the politics of race are set aside and the white research establishment takes time to study it.
She has been studying the disorder for two decades, and claims that even though no black person alive today has ever been a slave, that the historic stress is passed down genetically through the generations.
Anything to keep from dealing with personal responsibility. And mind you, she's even getting paid to "research" it!
Posted by: mhking at
11:36 AM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 412 words, total size 3 kb.
1
So, someone can use this exact excuse to harm Ms. Degruy-Leary, and it will be just A-OK?
Posted by: BigFire at May 31, 2004 01:18 PM (DtAIo)
2
The stress is passed down from generation to generation? Isn't that Lysenkoism?
Posted by: Pat Curley at May 31, 2004 02:56 PM (XQEqy)
3
Hey, I can slaughter my kids just because there were "Irish need not apply" signs in ol' Boston?! YAY!!!
Oh, wait. I
love my kids. Er... nevermind.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 31, 2004 03:38 PM (v/S3n)
4
This has got to be one of the most ridiculous things that I've seen this year. We've now done commentary on it on our blog, thanks to your link.
Posted by: molotov at May 31, 2004 03:44 PM (h3FX8)
5
Good God - I'm sure I could put the money she's being paid to much more productive use than this junk science.
Posted by: Lola Lee at May 31, 2004 05:11 PM (pHF7u)
6
I've been suffering from Post Traumatic Taxpayer Disorder for years.
Posted by: McGehee at June 01, 2004 01:31 AM (lGoQn)
7
I ran across this on the Internet, and was sure it must be some sort of post-April Fool's joke. Silly me.
I did a short blog on the subject: http://tinyurl.com/2bxdp
Posted by: Jaz at June 02, 2004 03:59 AM (/ylul)
8
Put it right next to Ebonics
Posted by: cj at June 21, 2004 05:07 PM (l0gSh)
9
I am part Native American Indian ...... can you imagine the defense I could use if this one was seen as credible?
My people were'nt taken as slaves.....they were just nearly wiped off the face of the earth! Jews join in on the chorus. Hell....many jews who were in concentration camps ......are still alive!
They actually suffered by the hands of others.
If we all go back in time far enough......we all will have an excuse now! Should I scalp my kid now and blame it on the european settlers descendants? Oh wait I'm also part German.....should I scalp myself?
Is there a race of people on earth who were'nt at one time victims of another as well as the perpetrator?
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"!
Posted by: bartikus at June 21, 2004 10:12 PM (FY9h/)
10
This disorder is actually being studied seriously and should be given serious thought, as opposed to just dismissing it because of the condescending tone of the writer of this article. The ideas of Freud and many other psychologists were also thought of as loopy and non-valid during their time, yet much of these ideas are tenets of current psychological thougth. But hey, to actually take seriously what a black psychologist is proposing would mean actually mean first getting past your own racist notions.
Posted by: Mon at August 26, 2004 11:40 AM (D6BPp)
11
yeah! I actually heard about this, though in more detail and in a more unbiased way than in this article. What the doctor and other doctors are saying is that black people adapted their intereactions because of slavery and Jim Crow era following. So their religion, rites of passage, etc. weren't allowed to follow them here because their white masters would not allow it. So when black women were raped by white men who sometimes were their own fathers, they had to find ways to cope. These coping mechanisms that might have worked then, are not working now for black people. That is what the doctor is saying. This should be given serious consideration.
Posted by: Lisa at August 26, 2004 11:48 AM (D6BPp)
12
What is cj talking about? Do you even know what ebonics is? Racist prick!
Posted by: Joe at August 26, 2004 11:51 AM (D6BPp)
13
doesn't matter what you white people say your experiences are not compairable. as usual your cultural arrogance dismisses whatever you cannot comprehend. the world has more than one perspective. everyone isn't like you..trying to find an excuse to justify your devilish natures. at least there is an attempt to explain the psychotic behaviour of your ancestors that can possibly result in treating the disorder presented in this thesis. let the ignorant continue to ignore the problem. let the healthy help those that are sick to heal.
Posted by: storm cloud at November 07, 2004 08:50 PM (fLlQ8)
14
As a Mulatto, or person of mixed ethnicity, as a person of mixed heritage, I suffer from European,(the Hungarians got fucked over in '56) African (some of my ancestors were indentured (enslaved),and sent to the colonies, the West Indies) and Asian, (again some of my ancestors -Chinese were indentured(enslaved) and sent to the West Indies to work in the oil fields)post trumatic slave /indentured labourer syndrome. Upon whom do I vent my seething rage?
Posted by: slavedriver at March 06, 2005 06:20 AM (e1b52)
15
I think the person who wrote this article took everything for which Dr. DeGruy-Leary stands, out of context. If people were to read her works and attend her workshops they would form a more intelligent opinion that isn't based upon someone elses mis-interpretation of this case. This article is misleading. If you read the quote, the quote is taken from her hypothesis based upon her research and not directly related to Mr. Bynum's case...READ PEOPLE!!!! stop allowing yourselves to be spoon-fed garbage and accepting it at face value.
DK Moore, MSW Howard University School of Social Work
Posted by: DeShantra Moore at April 14, 2005 07:56 PM (6tkSb)
16
The fact that people misuse the diagnosis (even if it isn't an official one yet) to excuse their actions doesn't make the point less valid that African-Americans may still be suffering from the effects of their heritage, which seems likely given what we already know about how trauma is passed on through generations. Instead of putting energy into finding out whether this condition exists and what we can do about it, the debate is turning into yet another race war, with the likes of Turning Spork questioning the validity of the claims and storm cloud generalising about white people. I think that's very sad.
Posted by: Kristen at June 30, 2005 03:32 AM (G06Z5)
17
Most so-called "Whites" are ALWAYS wrong on issues of race in the Americas. Most are ignorant on this subject and, worst, Arrogant in their Ignorance. However, they will awake when "Bottom Rail Is On Top". If you know what I mean.
Posted by: shawn at September 24, 2005 01:19 PM (pU2eP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A new curse enters the lexicon: Abu Ghirab
Thanks to
Son of Nixon, we can inform the populace of a new expletive in the American lexicon:
Abu Ghraib.
I was watching the Red Sox game versus the Oakland A's last night when all Abu Ghraibin' hell broke loose. The motherAbu Ghraibin' Sox pitchers gave up Abu Ghraibin' 15 runs last night.Abu Ghraibin' New York. Abu Ghraib A-Rod and Jeter. They're probably Abu Ghraibin' each other after games anyway. Those rotten little Abu Ghraibers.
Al Gore can go Abu Ghraib himself. Kerry too.
I wonder if the term will join the "seven dirty words" as one that cannot be said on television...
Posted by: mhking at
10:51 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hmmm...could lead to misunderstandings....Abu Graibin a beer after the game dear...The hell you say, there will be no Abu Graibin, less you want the skillet upside your head....yes dear mumble mumble Abu Graibin wife mumble mumble.
And with the seven words you can't say on television somewhat decreased over the years there should be plenty of room for Abu Graibin.
Posted by: Guy S. at May 31, 2004 06:54 PM (f6cjG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Equality is just as much a black responsibility as a white one.
Dr. Carol Swain, law and political science professor at Vanderbilt University,
is putting the big hurt on the black educational status quo, much as Bill Cosby did a couple of weeks ago.
Swain was a part of a panel that met in New York City shortly after the 50th Anniversary of the Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision, to talk about some of the obstacles facing students and schools in the urban landscape.
Swain identified affirmative action as currently practiced by universities -- lower admissions standards for blacks and Hispanics -- as part of the problem. These policies, she said, have "created a negative incentive structure for African-Americans who have either internalized societal messages about inferiority or have chosen an easier path of not exerting themselves too vigorously" since they don't have to meet higher standards.
A columnist for the
Boston Globe later asked Swain in an e-mail exchange if she felt that she was being "used" by agenda-pushing conservatives -- not unlike so many liberals that feel that black conservatives do not have a mind of their own; that conservative blacks cannot come to conservative conclusions by themselves. Those same liberals, both black and white, use some of their most vindictive rhetoric against independent thinking black conservatives.
"Do liberal blacks worry about being tokens for the status quo?" she replied. "I doubt it. I call things the way I see them."
Indeed.
Posted by: mhking at
02:46 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 255 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I can't stand it when blacks with a different opinion from the mainstream are asked if they're being used as the "white man's tool." The same can be said--and is often true--of black liberals. Thanks for the link to Swain's remarks.
Posted by: La Shawn Barber at May 31, 2004 04:32 AM (tW8zw)
2
Does anyone know if Dr. Swain has a weblog? It would be an informative one to follow, I think.
Posted by: Indigo at May 31, 2004 03:32 PM (shQXa)
3
It's hard to get a consensus among us about anything. Hell, if you take a poll and ask "Do UFOs regularly visit Earth you'll probably get about a 60/40 split.
There may be no evidence that supports it but people will still believe almost anything because it hasn't been proven untrue to them.
Yet, in Iraq, Saddam got 97% of the vote a few years ago and 100% last time. How the hell did THAT happen?
Fear, that's how.
So, we look at African-American voting patterns where they vote for Democrats in the 92+ per centile and what are we to think?
Fear is the weapon of the Democrats.
They've fed the lowest impulses of humanity and emotionalism down the throats of strong men and women and have successfully made them weak.
Liberalism impresses me because of it's eagerness to help it's fellow man. But it disgusts me when demogogues use a promised Assistance as a path to prosperity when it's only a dependence; all for the sake of a vote on election day.
If you tell someone that he's a victim long enough he'll believe it. I don't mind Democrats wanting to help a guy out. But when he becomes so intent on justifying his own proud existence that he's willing to create more victims than adults then I call
do over!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 31, 2004 05:00 PM (v/S3n)
4
Yeah!!! Our girl Dr. Swain breakin it down scientifically.......as always. Refusin to stick her head in the sand. (She is hell, pure HELL!! Gotta love 'er.)
I constantly wonder, how can our elders (born before 1960) expect ANY respect from us 35-45 blacks - among others - when they INSIST in wallowing in this angry, childish, self pity.........for what will soon be a *&%$in' half-century? (It's french)
So pitiful our so-called leaders are. I guess that's why they got so pissed off at Dr. Cosby for shining the light on their behinds......damn old liabilities need to go on out to pasture. Mfume. Waters.
Etc.
Posted by: Beau at June 01, 2004 03:19 AM (GpmN8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 30, 2004
A&E Special: The Horror of Hussain; where're the moonbats now?
The Horror of Hussain goes into detail about the true atrocities of Iraq.
It shows the horror and the evil of Saddam and his sons. It talks about the executions. It talks about the torture. It talks about the sadism. It talks about the butchery.
The moonbats conveniently forget that when they talk about "a few photographs."
Charles Barron conveniently forgot that when he tried to challenge me on Fox News Channel's Hannity & Colmes last month.
A&E's evening of specials doesn't sugar coat the truth; it doesn't try to paint the Bush Administration as the bad guys. It tells the truth: That Saddam was an evil, brutal man, who deserves what awaits him.
And it tells an even greater truth: that Saddam killed far more Iraqis than Coalition forces ever could have killed. That Saddam brutally murdered thousands of his own citizens in cold blood.
That literally thousands more were tortured and terrorized at his hand and on his word. Men. Women. Children. Saddam didn't care. Obviously the moonbats don't care either.
Posted by: mhking at
06:07 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 193 words, total size 1 kb.
Easy Reader drives the pace car at Indianapolis
I'm showing my age, ain't I?
Posted by: mhking at
02:33 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.
May 29, 2004
"Any black who votes for Bush should be strung up and shot"
Shay at Crispus
has been dealing with friends -- not unlike I have -- who are so vehemently against President Bush that their hatred is tangible.
"Voting for Bush is Voting Against Your People"
This is what the husband of one of my best friends told me yesterday, and my friend concurred. The husband also said, "Any black who votes for Bush should be strung up and shot" (I kid you not). Ouch!
This comment was in response to portions of this Washington Times article that I was reading to them. They're hotly opposed to the war in Iraq, and absolutely hate President Bush. In fact, awhile back my friend's husband said that he hoped the economy doesn't improve just so it would help Bush lose.
No one can tell me why their hatred for the man is so strong. Many people immediately point at the way, but when you point out that their level of hatred was just as strong prior to the war, their arguement falls apart.
Many are lost in the strawman arguement over the Electoral College, and even when faced with the reality of how the Electoral College works in general, along with how it played into the 2000 election, their emotion gets beyond any semblance of logic they may have.
It's pretty sad that so many allow their emotions to rule over and above any sense of logic they may have.
Posted by: mhking at
03:19 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 258 words, total size 2 kb.
1
"Strung up"? I take it somebody's irony detector wasn't working when he said that.
Posted by: McGehee at May 29, 2004 03:31 PM (lGoQn)
2
Yeah, his irony detector wasn't working! I was taken aback by the lynching imagery, given history. I was also taken aback by the shooting imagery, but they support gun control so I don't have to worry!
Posted by: shay at May 29, 2004 03:37 PM (h3FX8)
3
These are the same people that gush about their compassion and peaceable natures. Okay then, Hitler loved his dog.
Posted by: StarBanker at May 29, 2004 08:12 PM (a0RBt)
4
They make it sound as thought Bush has done something specific and detrimental to the black community. To say that any person voting for Bush should be shot is to say you hate Bush; to say that any black person...etc. is to say that Bush specifically and deliberately harms blacks.
Oh well, I know this arguments are unwinable anyway.
Posted by: Beck at May 29, 2004 09:29 PM (fllfQ)
5
Strung up and shot? Didn't that used to be called a lynching and isn't that what "nigger" hating Klu Klux Klanners used to do because of their irrational hatred of people whose skin was darker than their own. . . and wasn't it devout Christians of all denominations and Jews who were in the forefront of movements to end slavery and then in the forefront of the civil rights movement? People like President Bush who takes his religion seriously. Yes, I believe they were.
In fact, more Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act than Democrats (you could look it up). Al Gore's sainted father a senator from Tennessee voted against the Civil Rights Act, as did many other southern Democrats.
Most Blacks, Colored-People, Negroes, African-Americans or whatever name they wish to be called have no historical perspective. Keeping them in the permanent custodial custody of ignorance, welfare and victimhood means big bucks to their so-called leaders and the teachers' unions whose vise-like grip on the throats of liberal politicians are full accomplices in the dumbing down of public school education.
Bill Cosby, a traditional liberal Democrat, has finally spoken to the obvious. If his impeccable credentials and his long history of public service count for anything, perhaps it will give other well known Blacks the courage to speak out in agreement and break the back of the self-defeating Oreo cookie brand of racism practiced from sea to shinning sea.
Posted by: erp at May 30, 2004 07:44 AM (V44wo)
6
"In fact, awhile back my friend's husband said that he hoped the economy doesn't improve just so it would help Bush lose."
I don't think that that's an uncommon mindset among Bush haters. They don't even care if their idignant emotional rantings (
Al gore I'm looking in your direction...) are emboldening terrorists and thus endangering soldiers and civilians as long as they think that they can hurt Bush.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 30, 2004 07:29 PM (XelmQ)
7
You know you've got some serious mind control going on when someone convinces you that tax cuts (keeping more of your hard-earned money, even if it's "only" $300) are bad and tax increases ($300 X 10) are good.
Posted by: La Shawn Barber at May 31, 2004 08:03 AM (tW8zw)
8
Oh God........enough with the internet bravado. Need to go back & bark that stuff to their brain-dead followers.
Oh, Mr. Husband, you are cordially invited to come string me up........if you can. Now I'm quakin in my penny loafers.
The Negro Lib is truly intellectually lame. Can we get a challenge over here!!???? Hello!!!!
Posted by: Beau at June 01, 2004 03:35 AM (GpmN8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Denver-based idiot equates military service with slavery
Former Denver Broncos player Reggie Rivers
penned an insulting screed in the
Denver Post equating military service with slavery.
You heard me. He thinks that military service is slavery, because he insists (along with most other moonbats) that they were "lied to" about the situation in the Middle East.
Yes, our slaves signed up of their own free will, but most of them were as misled about their job as the rest of us were about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Rivers has this moronic view that our fighting men and women are too stupid to make their own decisions; that they're under some sort of spell. He insists that anyone with any kind of sense would not volunteer for the military.
Our armed forces recruiters are quite adept at making military service appear beneficial (it mostly is) and safe (it's not). The threat of war is minimized, because few rational people actually want to fight.
Rivers keeps trying to claim that the military is complicit in this manner, because they sell the benefits of military service. The benefits are not without their risks. Each and every soldier is aware of the risks going in. And in their minds, the benefits outweigh the risks. This is not a matter of "slavery" as Rivers wants to put it; heck, if it were, then anyone who signs a contract -- like a player in the NFL -- would be counted as a "slave."
Oh. I guess Rivers is exempt. After all, he collected a hefty paycheck from the Denver Broncos.
Perhaps he would do well to speak to his cohorts in the League who have participated in the armed forces. He might talk to some of the thousands of veterans who have made something of themselves as a result of their military service during both war and peacetime.
Perhaps Rivers might find it useful to speak to someone who doesn't have the level of selfishness that Rivers himself has found so useful in his day to day walk through life. After all, Rivers ought to respect his elders, yes? Maybe not.
Then again, perhaps Rivers and his disdain for those with a greater sense of honor than he has might better be served if he were to be ignored.
Posted by: mhking at
01:54 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 395 words, total size 3 kb.
1
When people like Rivers talks, I think that they are merely projecting their own ignorance onto others. It is he who would be fooled into joining the Army believing that an occupation that requires you to carry or drive the most dangerous weapons ever build was "safe." I think that by the time I was 5 years-old I knew that soldiers kill and are killed, along with assorted cowboys and Indians. I hope that River's mother told him that just laying next to his wife would not get her pregnant.
Posted by: StarBanker at May 29, 2004 08:09 PM (a0RBt)
2
The basic argument here is that soldiers are thinking, "If I'd known I might have to go to war, I never would have joined the army," as though the army is one big welfare institution which provides a living at the expense of getting yelled at by your drill sargeant/instructor during boot camp. God forbid you actually should have to, you know, do some soldiering.
Posted by: Beck at May 29, 2004 09:31 PM (fllfQ)
3
More proof that leftwing propaganda is working.
Posted by: erp at May 31, 2004 06:10 AM (V44wo)
4
Race preferences in action.
Posted by: La Shawn Barber at May 31, 2004 08:04 AM (tW8zw)
5
Reggie "Dumbass" Rivers is born......but we need lowered standards.
Brilliant!!
Posted by: Beau at June 01, 2004 03:24 AM (GpmN8)
6
I do believe Reggie Rivers has been playing without his helmet. Sounds like brain damage. Yup, sure does.
Posted by: Ms RightWing at June 02, 2004 02:52 PM (Pq63M)
7
compulsory military service is worse than slavery.
Posted by: ./ at August 15, 2004 02:11 AM (pRzya)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Saturday morning in the King Treehouse
Saturday mornings are quiet around the treehouse.
I can usually sit downstairs with a cup of coffee before the house stirs, and surf or listen to music or think or piddle or some other such thing.
This morning, I'm given to doing half of all the above simultaneously. Life will intrude soon enough -- I've got a couple of letters that have to be done today, She-Who-Must-Be-Obeyed wants to go to the new Home Depot Landscape Warehouse (which just opened close-by); the Angst-ridden, love-smitten teenager wants to go to the mall (when does she NOT want to go?); Number One Son (who scowls at his older sister when she calls him Lemonhead) just wants to get out of the house, and The Baby (who dances so much to the Badger-Badger-Badger song that her older sibs call her Badger) just wants some attention.
Add to that the wedding Rae and I have to attend this afternoon (I'm not in the mood for a frelling wedding, but She-Who-Must-Be-Obeyed frowns at me when I subtly hint at other activities instead; which, of course means I'm going). Then the market journey intrudes...
But all that is yet to come this morning. Dad has yet to call - his phone call usually signals the rest of the household to stir all at once.
No, this morning, I'm actually trying to hash out in my mind, the real first chapter of the book.
The book has been playing with itself in fits and starts in my mind for more than two years now, with bits and pieces playing itself out in my articles, both online and not. I've got many of the chapters outlined in relative detail, and ongoing events push around those details like so many rubber ducks floating in the bathtub.
But the opening chapter has always eluded me.
I'm finally finding some measure of foraging in that direction though. I hope. Maybe.
Posted by: mhking at
03:38 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 331 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Your book has been playing with itself like rubber ducks in a bathtub?
I think that is quite possibly the world's greatest ever inadvertantly funny metaphore.
Posted by: Beck at May 29, 2004 09:34 PM (fllfQ)
2
Good God, Michael. And good luck.
I've been "toying" with the idea of writing a book since I was...eh...twelve?
I just started my 80th version of Chapter 1 the other night. Of course, I'm assuming yours will be political or at least non-fiction.
I've chosen to torture myself by writing a novel. I have no doubt the entire idea will be forfeited at the first sign of trouble!!
Posted by: Julie Anne Fidler at May 30, 2004 10:35 AM (b/7hi)
3
A very good and informative article indeed . It helps me a lot to enhance my knowledge, I really like the way the writer presented his views.
<a href="http://www.bakecaannunci.com/incontri/">bakeca incontri</a>
Posted by: michele at November 28, 2011 10:54 AM (KKaeZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 28, 2004
OJ the killer is now offically also "money grubbing scum."
According to
Star Magazine, OJ Simpson's lawyer, Yale Galanter, is shopping around paid interview and photo ops for his client, as we approach the 10th anniversary of the brutal murders of Simpson's wife Nicole and her friend, Ron Goldman.
"It will be expensive," the mag quotes Galanter. "TV rights are going for $100,000. For print rights, between $20,000 and $25,000."Nothing if not classy, Galanter adds that O.J. might even be willing to do a photo shoot at the Brentwood crime scene and at Nicole's grave site - if the price is right.
"It would have to be a multimillion-type deal," Galanter says. A grave site photo would be "worth $500,000 ... Our preference is a standard interview ... but it's just money."
Perhaps someone would be willing to take out a contract on the man. After all, "it's just money."
Nicole Simpson & Ron Goldman were murdered June 12, 1994.
Posted by: mhking at
04:42 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 173 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yo Mike, don't be dissin my fellow South Floridian!! Shoot!
On the other hand, I can start passin the hat around down here at The Bottom........got a GANG of cheap, Cuban hitmen runnin around.
They'll smoke your ass for a 20 bails of sugar cane, 2000 cuban cigars..........or a 5 year supply of cuban espresso coffee. (Cheap, aint it!!)
What a bargain.
Posted by: Beau at May 28, 2004 06:18 AM (GpmN8)
2
I wonder if the award the court granted Fred Goldman would come into play for any of these earnings.
Posted by: Fausta at May 28, 2004 09:55 AM (WhoVr)
Posted by: DeoDuce at May 28, 2004 03:08 PM (4jEpt)
4
Maybe he should also be giving us all a progress report on how his search for the "real" killers is going.
Posted by: Lola Lee at May 29, 2004 05:48 AM (pHF7u)
5
lol I assume OJ's search for the "real killer(s)" is going just as well as Scott Peterson's. As long as they stay away from mirrors they can continue "searching".
Posted by: Deb at May 29, 2004 10:12 AM (f6cjG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Michael "The Cryptkeeper" Jackson looks for reduction of $3 million bail
Michael Jackson's lawyers
have formally asked for a reduction of the $3 million bail placed on the singer in his child molestation case. This despite fears by the prosecution that MJ might flee if faced with conviction.
Jackson's legal team claim the singer is not a flight risk (yeah, right!), and should get the same level of bail that any other individual would receive.
"As the day of trial approaches and Mr. Jackson makes a hard-headed assessment of his chances for an acquittal and ponders the unhappy but inevitable consequences of a conviction, he may well conclude that life as a wealthy absconder ... is preferable to what might amount to a life term in a California prison," prosecutors said in court papers. Prosecutors argued in their motion that Jackson was an international celebrity "whose lifestyle to date would not have prepared him to adapt readily to a prison environment and routine and whose physical stature would present its own problems for him in making the necessary adjustments."
Oh, yeah. Right. Can you imagine MJ in a jail cell? With a massive cellmate named Bubba? Who has a problem with depth perception?
I'm thinking that MJ would either try to go live with fellow convicted child molester Roman Polanski overseas, or try to kill himself.
Then the question is how many of the fawning fans who worship the ground the has-been performer walks on would follow the Cryptkeeper-lookalike into oblivion...
Posted by: mhking at
04:17 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 261 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Puh-lease.........that scumbag'll be on the next flight to France, watch.
There, he can hangout with fell sh--heads Papa Doc or Baby Doc Duvalier (whatever!) - the killers of thousands of Haitians in ANOTHER failed French colony around the world.
(Okay, not quite the same analogy, but crooks nonetheless.)
Then, as a reward, they get "political" asylum (sp). (Can the frenchies do anything right?)
Hmm, isn't France also where Mark Rich and the other guy - the movie maker/statutory rapist - live? Polanski, is it?
Hell no, you don't get no bail reductio!! Sell a couple cows from Neverland.......punk ass.
Posted by: Beau at May 28, 2004 06:13 AM (GpmN8)
2
Are you a complete idiot, Michael? (Don't bother. I already know the answer to that.) "Fellow convicted child molester Roman Polanski." Neither Michael Jackson nor Roman Polanski is a convicted child molester. Accused. Not convicted. Heck, not even tried.
Posted by: Mac Diva at June 03, 2004 07:50 PM (I7z5C)
Posted by: jenny at July 30, 2011 01:28 PM (fEoCB)
Posted by: rosy at November 17, 2011 10:27 PM (d7Qlq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 27, 2004
Cincinnati City Council objects, says Cops has to leave
Cameras for Cops stopped rolling in Cincinnati this afternoon, after members of the Queen City's city council objected over what the show might depict.
The Saturday night Fox staple is finishing it's 15th season on the air. It shows real-life police officers from around the nation during "ride-alongs," so viewers can see what the officers see.
The crew began filming Tuesday, and today, Cincinnati Police Chief Tom Streicher "changed his mind" about allowing the crew to continue filming.
Streicher's decision came after Wednesday's City Council meeting, during which council members Alicia Reece, Christopher Smitherman and Pat DeWine expressed concern about the filming, which they feared would portray the city poorly. Reece said a show that "sensationalizes" crime could hurt the city's ability to attract tourists and businesses.They also said they were concerned city council was not consulted or were not able to provide input on Streicher's invitation to the show to film his officers.
Sounds like the council is afraid of the rest of the nation seeing the truth about Cincinnati -- whatever that "truth" might be.
Posted by: mhking at
03:26 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 195 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You know, this is very stupid. I don't live too far from Cincinnati, I would love to see what goes on there w/ cops
.
Posted by: MJG at May 27, 2004 03:53 PM (X4iEi)
2
Heaven forfend America should discover that there are <gasp!>
crimes committed in Cincinnati!
Posted by: McGehee at May 27, 2004 03:54 PM (lGoQn)
3
I would think when your two most famous hometown heroes are Jerry Springer and Marge Schott, you'd give anything to paint a different picture. Oh well, I'm sure this will set off another riot....er.....round of civil disobedience.
Posted by: Rabbit at May 28, 2004 03:42 AM (4k1jT)
4
"Heaven forfend America should discover that there are crimes committed in Cincinnati!"
Took the words right out of my mouth!
Posted by: Stone at May 28, 2004 04:05 AM (FWis6)
5
I live just north of Cincinnati...
The city had a real opportunity to express confidence in their police department and failed to do so. That is sad. The fact that the criticism comes from the Vice Mayor and two other city council-people makes it sting twice as much, I'm sure.
We have to support the Thin Blue Line...they are all that seperates us from lawlessness and chaos.
Posted by: Matt Hurley at May 28, 2004 08:08 AM (RkkMK)
6
The stories I could tell....but, not now.
I was born and raised in Cincinnati and have spent the last four years in the midst of all the unrest as a full time limo driver. I have watched it all.
Heather McDonald ( City Journal - A Google should bring her pieces up) writes some of the best pieces I've read on the riots and the general attack on the police dept. I have never been a fan of cops, but I am now. They have been railroaded in this town. I have witnessed first hand the endless harassment by "activists" trailing after foot patrols with a camcorder, interfering in arrests, harassing concert goers. The incidents are endless and incremental and slowly add up till you are quite unwilling to give
any damn body the benefit of a doubt.
I know damn well legitimate grievances and inequities exist in this city, as in all cities, but I also know the progress I was witnessing as I grew up and the American culture grew richer with black voices and faces in every walk of life. Or so I thought. Progress, miserably slow perhaps, but we
were getting somewhere.
Now? Now there is palpable tension, overt hostility, and me, I'll have none of it. Have no patience for the PC. Bound to get my ass shot some night because I won't play the game.
And the thing is, it isn't
even a race thing. It's an ideology. It is part of the malaise stalking America dressed in many '-isms'. It's when none of us stand tall in the gifts the human race is graced with, but walk shackled with all the lies we've bought that says we are all a race of lesser beings.
Good didn't make no lesser beings. We did.
I am heartbroken over what has evolved here.
Posted by: zee at June 01, 2004 08:29 AM (cMwmQ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
You can never satisfy treehuggers
Piedmont Park in Atlanta is a park not unlike New York's Central Park or Chicago's Lincoln Park in terms of size and scope. It's midtown Atlanta's back yard amid the zillions of trees in this part of the country.
The northern part of the park has been nearly overgrown with kudzu (remind me to tell you about kudzu one day) and other plant life; very few people go over there. There's a city of Atlanta maintenance garage over there, and it backs up to subdivisions and a shopping area on the northern end of the park.
Also adjacent to the park is the Atlanta Botanical Garden. The Garden along with the Park as a whole, are in need of additional parking space.
The Garden has designed a garage with six levels of parking for 800 cars that will stretch over an acre; the garage will be built in a way that minimal impact will be placed upon the land. People will still be able to enjoy the park, and there will be less impact on the surrounding area as people try to find places to park. The garage will be built in a way that it is concealed from the surroundings, with an earthen berm and 25-foot tall trees surrounding it.
But, as you can imagine, the treehuggers are still not happy.
"We don't care that it's green and beautiful," said Susan Abramson of Friends of Piedmont Park. "We know it's concrete and steel underneath, and we know there will be cars coming in and out."
If a car parks, and you don't see it, is it still offensive?
Just damn.
Posted by: mhking at
08:58 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 279 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Cars are the reason Western Civilization has destroyed the planet. According to Al Gore, the internal combustion engine is the worst thing to happen to mankind since the snake in the Garden of Eden.
So. Now you know. Cars are bad. Wherever they are.
Posted by: erp at May 27, 2004 10:35 AM (MpKJk)
2
Of course, since AlGore is trying to justify his continued presence on the national stage, anything he says can be taken with a grain of salt. Especially since he probably invented salt...
Posted by: mhking at May 27, 2004 10:49 AM (KoiwA)
3
A garage means people can drive to the park and <shudder>
use it.
That's what they're really objecting to.
Posted by: McGehee at May 27, 2004 03:05 PM (lGoQn)
4
Ah, kudzu. Ever since I moved to NJ I miss the kudzu, can you believe?
Posted by: Fausta at May 28, 2004 05:33 AM (WhoVr)
5
What do they expect us to do, ride Marta and hoof it the 8 blocks with little kids and all the stuff that comes with a trip to the park? Cause the next thing they'll want to do is stop the buses. I suppose they live in houses made of straw bales and work in mud hut buildings instead of "concrete and steel". Yeesh!
Posted by: nonford at May 30, 2004 06:09 PM (2tOaO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Black gay Republicans stage protest against gay marriage
I wouldn't have believed this one if I hadn't seen it with my own eyes. My jaw is still stuck to the keyboard.
The Abe Lincoln Black Republican Caucus, a group of "young Black gay, bisexual and 'down lo' males" has been protesting across the nation against gay marriage.
"It is an international disgrace and an affront to every Black man, woman and child in the United States for the Massachusetts' Supreme Court to start marriage for gays on the 50th anniversary of the Brown vs. Topeka Board of Education Decision," stated Don Sneed, the political mentor for the ALBRC and a member of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS (Bush Appointee). "I am sick and tired of seeing the white gay rights movement continue to hijack the Black civil rights movement and make these situations one and the same," stated Anthony Falls, Chairman of the ALBRC and recently elected the first Black openly gay Republican Precinct Chairman in Texas.
The group protested not only gay marriage, but what they called "unbridled racism" among white gays.
On last Saturday, at a huge rally held in the Oak Lawn area in support of Marriage for Gays and against the constitutional amendment for defense of marriage, the ALBRC staged a highly vocal and visible counter protest and demonstration against what it considers 30 years of unchecked and unbridled racism by the White gay community against Black gays and lesbians. The protest march was again taken through the heart of the Oak Lawn community to the astonishment and amazement of the local gay patrons and shopkeepers. The protesters were met with some racial slurs and threats."We are not afraid of the white gay economic and political behemoth that continues to treat us like third class citizens and trash. It is the epitome of hypocrisy for White gays and lesbians to base their claims for rights to marry upon prejudice, discrimination and civil rights violations, when they are prejudiced, discriminatory and disrespectful of Black gay's and lesbian's human rights each and every day," stated Mr. Sneed. "The White gay community is one of America's last strongholds for White Supremacy. We will begin the dismantling of that stronghold today in downtown Dallas," stated Willie Beard, an ALBRC member.
Seems like everyone is considering leaving the liberal plantation.
I had no clue that such an organization existed in the black gay community. I am certainly familiar with white gay members of the GOP, and by extension groups like the Log Cabin Republicans, but this completely surprises me.
Posted by: mhking at
04:53 AM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 435 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Ok, now I'm really confused......
White gay men discriminating against black gay men? Gays discriminating against other gays?
We can finally have gay black men being able to protest against gay marriage and the white gay man keeps them down! This is EXACTLY what Malcolm X was talking about.
Or something.
My head is spinning.
Posted by: Tman at May 27, 2004 05:14 AM (Fho+X)
2
Mike!! They all done found out about the Underground Railroad!!
Oh, boy do the slaves got some decisions to make. Do I stay or do I go?
Mmm........and so much for marryin my cousin - looks like this Man & Woman ONLY stuff is gonna survive. She is too fine.
(I'm just kidding St. Peter.)
Posted by: Beau at May 27, 2004 05:17 AM (GpmN8)
3
I'm not shocked. Gay activists do not speak for the entire gay community. I have heard a few non-activist gay people speak out against same sex marriage. They're just not screaming it from the top of their lungs, is all.
Posted by: Deb at May 27, 2004 07:02 AM (f6cjG)
4
This is NOT a shock to me. As a straight, African American female with gay, African American friends (and by the way I live in San Francisco), I can tell you that the white gay community is EXTREMELY RACISTS and NON INCLUSIVE.
Everything that they accuse everyone else of, intolerant, ignorant, etc., they are exactly the same way!
If I were a Black gay, I would NOT support their struggle.
Believe me, these people are very discriminatory and racists.
For example: I went to see Alvin Ailey earlier this year. A white lesbian couple was standing near a food/beverage line during the intermission.
Two black girls (probably ages 12 and 13) politely asked, if they were standing in the actual line.
The lesbian rudely replied, "Duh! Does it look like I'm standing in line."
The girls were very sweet and just moved forward in the line.
But I'm observing this and thinking to myself, "These white lesbians are here at a Black event, seeing a world famous Black dance company and are surrounded by Black people and REFUSE to be polite for 2 hours!
This really infuriated me because it's only one of the many examples of how racists the white gay community is.
I say, "kudos" to the African American gays for not pushing the white gay agenda, which they know, in the long run, will not benefit them!
Posted by: Natacha in San Francisco at June 28, 2004 02:23 AM (JbGqp)
5
Hey, did you hear on Rush today that ALBRC, endorsed Bush today? That's awesome, what is that 3, maybe 4 more black votes. We in the GOP need to do more.
Posted by: Norm at September 22, 2004 09:27 AM (Iy5SM)
6
Well, I feel sorry for you Natacha. You don't seem to have many white friends, so maybe that's part of your problem. As a white lesbian, my partner and I have PLENT of friends that are of other racial and cultural back grounds; hell my partner is hispanic! So to say that all white gays and lesbians are prejudiuce is not a fair or true statement. I live in Arizona and there is a diverse culture here. To walk around with blinders on is an idiotic thing to do and it seems to me that your blinders don't like white folks.
It is sad to see our community fighting amongest themselves over such silly issues. We all need to stand together because that is the only was our voice can be heard. You can't honestly tell me there are NO Afican Americans, Spanish Americans, Asian Americans, ect...would EVER wnat to be united with their gay/lesbian partner in a union that would seal their love forever. Thst is just NOT TRUE! Everyone wants to be happy, everyone wants to be treated equally. If you really want to get down to it, as a college student I don't qualify for most grants and scholarships because I am NOT enough of a minority! People would be up in arms if we had the White Rednecks Scholarship fund "Because inbreeding minds are a terrible thing to waste". Yet there is an organization called The United Negro College Fund for African American students.
Turn about is fair play people. Not all white people are prejudice, and I happen to be one of them. Equality for all is what I say!
Posted by: Misty at September 22, 2004 01:33 PM (IcvS7)
7
I find it difficult to believe that a group of black gay men are supporting Bush. My reaction was the same when the Log Cabin group made the same announcement. Whether or not they are in favour of gay marriage is one issue but to support Bush is completely off the wall. The man is not good for the country.
Just because he apointed Sneed to a position, he seems to feel to cement his status by endorsing Bush. I wonder how long he will have that position once the election is over.
Posted by: Carl Lawrence at September 22, 2004 02:27 PM (JyGO6)
8
It is obvious that Sneed is a pal of W..............................nuff said
Posted by: Joe at September 22, 2004 06:41 PM (AaBEz)
9
If you are for GWB - visit this cool site and
buy a flag - They are really cool. Thanks.
www.wflag.com
Show your support for the President. Fly it high.
Posted by: John Thomas at September 22, 2004 07:32 PM (y7vjA)
10
Gay blacks are discriminated by gay whites. Gay Christians are discriminated by gay non-christians. Gay conservatives are discriminated by gay liberals. Gay poor are discriminated by gay rich. Gay HIV+ are discriminated by gay HIV-. Gay singles are discriminated by gay couples. Lesbians are discriminated by gay men. Welcome to Dallas. Usually the problems of the city, county or DISD are all race based as the blacks, latino and whites fight for power.
There is one thing that the Abe Lincoln Black Republican Caucus got right. Fight the other battles of non-discrimination, partner benifits, don't ask don't tell before marriage.
1)The majority of gay community doesn't act like they deserve marriage. 2)Texas will be the last state to pass gay marriage laws and I have to find a husband first. 3)Time will change view because of demographics. The young are more accepting.
Posted by: Balfacan at September 22, 2004 09:47 PM (TI3DO)
11
If you think this endorcement carries any weight at all, your political barometer needs adjustment. The history of this group has isolated them from, blacks, gays and the GOP. The only thing greater than the lack of respect for this group, is there lack of credibility.
Francis Molina
Posted by: Francis Molina at September 23, 2004 05:08 AM (JkbHn)
12
Don't you think that racism is just as alive and well in the gay community as in the rest of American society? Do you think that the San Francisco PC patrol isn't aware racial division is a huge divider among the gays and lesbians? But the fact is we divide ourselves. We can't all be gay. We have to hold the GLTB Parade.
Isn't the unity seeking redundant in dividing ourselves into 4 groups?
There is only one issue here. Marriage. It's not that I am not a 23 year old, white, ripped bodied, blond hair, green eyed male with an above average income and a college education. So stop your whining.
Natacha - did it occur to you that maybe those lesbians were just rude and have no manners? Did it occur to you as a black proud lesbian to thank the drag queens for getting this movement started? How many times have you looked down your nose at someone else not for who they were but for your perception?
Having one splinter group trying to one-up body is divisive and petulant.
Marriage rights for gays is not a political matter to be debated. Just as black rights were not a political matter, just as interracial marriage is not a political matter.
Marriage in the United States is a legal term. Regardless of all its other connotations, it is a legal term that confers legal and enforceable rights, responsibilities and privileges to American Citizens. As such it must be applies with all its privileges and responsibilities to all Americans.
The constitution guarantees freedom for all. There is no extra or special rights section reserved for “Straight Americans”… well, that is unless the current administration has its way.
And there is the problem the Lincoln caucusÂ’s point.
Posted by: Mikem at September 23, 2004 05:24 AM (/tLkn)
13
Just a few observations--racism is alive and well in every community in this country
It's really disturbing to see people paint other groups with such a wide brush--that's pretty close-minded as well
I didnt' realize that Alvin Ailey Dance Company is exclusively a black event. Maybe they should have posted signs.
I went to see the Lion King last night--the villian was played by a white actor. Does that make it a racist musical? Blacks are the heroes and whites are the bad guys?
Posted by: Theodaddy at September 23, 2004 10:05 AM (c+R9Z)
14
I think it must be poor Natacha's time of the month. I'm half of a black/white mixed race gay couple and my sister's a lesbian so let me wade into both points.
On the racism point: I hate to tell you sweetie but whites don't hold an exclusive on racist attitudes and behavior. I've seen racism among blacks against other races and you have too, haven't you Natacha? If you say that you haven't, then you're simply in denial.
In fact I've also seen plenty of black men who only date within their race - just like some white men, some asian men, some latin men date only within their races. It's called "choice". Personally I think they're shortchanging themselves, but that's their perogative.
Regarding the two lesbians, I concur with the post above that I wasn't aware that Alvin Ailey Dance performances were a black-only event. Did they annoint you with the authority to exclude people who you don't feel belong in their shows? Does "black-only" also apply to shows by Lenny Kravitz, the Isley Brothers, BB King, Stevie Wonder, etc.? Does it apply to reruns of the black television shows too?
If the two women were rude, perhaps that's just the two of them. Maybe they'd had a fight and they were in a mood. Perhaps it was even THEIR time of the month and their hormones were raging. Are you always polite in every situation Natacha? Do you always exude sweetness and light? Somehow I doubt it.
Take a pill and calm down girl! Jeez!!! You'll work yourself into a heart attack if you keep this anger up!
Posted by: Peter at September 23, 2004 12:34 PM (GBTKj)
15
Follow the money. Who is funding this group? They don't speak for all black gay republican men - who after all are individuals and come to different conclusions about whether to support Bush - as to white gay men.
Not surprising Rush is going with this story.
Sure there's some white gays that are racist. There are also straight blacks that are anti-gay. There are others who look beyond that.
People are individuals - and this group does the same sort of race baiting that Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson do.
Sneed who runs this group, is ED of an aids organization - and there are big financial problems with it - and whenever confronted with this, he throws up the race card.
In my view, it's racist to have a lower standard for blacks than you do for whites - because you want to avoid being painted as racist.
Posted by: Eva Young at September 23, 2004 06:19 PM (py5Jd)
16
This is NOT a shock to me. As a straight, African American female with gay, African American friends (and by the way I live in San Francisco), I can tell you that the white gay community is EXTREMELY RACISTS and NON INCLUSIVE.
Everything that they accuse everyone else of, intolerant, ignorant, etc., they are exactly the same way!
If I were a Black gay, I would NOT support their struggle.
Believe me, these people are very discriminatory and racists.
======================================================================================================================================================
Natacha in SF: you are absolutely right that the white gay community (especially the white gay MALE community) is incredibly racist, among other things.
And I certainly don't blame them for not *lending their support* to the mainly white leadership of the marriage equality struggle.
But it's not logical to cut off your nose to spite your face... and it's CERTAINLY not logical to endorse Bush! Bush is all things against blacks... why on earth would they choose to endorse him because they experienced racism from the white gay community? Point "A1" does not lead to point "V3"!
If anything they could have chosen to endorse some third party. The Libertarians, the Greens, the Socialists, depending on the political leanings of the entire 4 members of this entire group.
Endorsing Bush, I think was a ploy for attention from the media, and what do you know? It worked. Just goes to show how much brains the media has. Now, instead of having 8 more black gay people across America voting for Bush, as would have been the result of this endorsement had the gay press ignored it, maybe 154 people across America who would originally have voted for Kerry or stayed home, will now vote for Bush.
Not that it makes anything more than a peripheral difference, but it's wise for:
a) this marginal group, now that they've got some attention, if they are really complaining about Kerry, to endorse a different party like the Greens...
and for
b) the gay press to ignore these displays of whining for attention in future.
Is the racialism and exclusion of the white gay community a problem? Absolutely? Is endorsing and voting for Bush going to solve it? Hardly. It will only perpetuate the very same problem that massa's field hands are complaining about...
Posted by: Homo Ffectional at September 24, 2004 11:51 AM (OIH8h)
17
Hey ya, I totally agree with Homo Ffectionals comments, and want to add my two cents. Yes, the gay (white male) community is very exclusive at the least, racist and sexist at its very worst, but no more so than the heterosexual community. Could I similarly say that ethnic communities (one to which I belong to) are really sexist and homophobic? What is this word community anyway? Just because I fuck guys does that mean you're my brother (as in the fraternity sense)? Identity needs to be analysed in the context of class if you ever discuss the political minefield of discrimination, or we run into the trouble of the failed hope that just because we have gays, blacks, and women in the hallrooms of power that one day the barriers of discrimination will suddenly breakdown. Look at Margaret Thatcher, what was her contribution to women's rights other than to enjoy the rights that were won by working-class women? As advocated by the Abe Lincoln Black Republicans, this is the same situation we can see with the appointments made by the Republican Bush Administration of Colin Powell and Condi Rice among others. Just because they are now in high power administrative roles does not mean they are helping the movement towards acceptance and the end of discrimination, but rather are simply enjoying the benefits that blood, sweat and tears of millions fought for. Tolerance and the ending of oppression cannot be won by any one person, but is the responsibility for all. No war between races, no peace between classes.
Posted by: Miguel at January 19, 2005 05:31 PM (yHrK9)
18
I think it is wrong to campaign against gay marriage. Yet, i am not at all happy with gay activists, black or white. A true campaign for gay rights promotes the rights, privileges, and autonomy of each sexual orientation. The gay movement focuses on discrimination from men, mainly heterosexual men. That needs to be just one of the foci.Gay men are discriminated against also by lesbian, bisexual, heterosexual, and transgender women. Lesbian, bisexual, heterosexual, and transgender women engage in heinous anti gay male activity in the name of solidarity. They force their way into gay male erotica: adult magazines and videos. The Advocate started as a gay male magazine. Leaving heterosexual men, women bare their breasts at rallies with gay men. Gay men find that completely disgusting. Gay men are forced to be paired with women in every gay organization. What is the purpose in calling it gay? It is not enough just to say we are against heterosexual oppression, only meaning men---anti gay male activities by women gets much less action. Men who are exclusively attracted to men must stop getting always joined with women under all circumstances. Gay male strippers don't want women putting money in their clothing at gay bars. New York and New Jersey are allies, but only citizens of New York get to vote in New York. Women should not be allowed to vote in gay male activities or it is just as bad as discrimination from heterosexuals. Gay men need to be able to discuss their own issues away from bisexuals, lesbians, heterosexuals, and transgender people, then and only then can they come together with others as allies. No more glbt in absolutely everything. That way gay men can deal with internal issues, like race.
Posted by: The Gay Red States at January 28, 2005 09:12 AM (s+G5C)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 26, 2004
Pandering of the highest order -- only in America, and only by the GOP!
GOP Chairman Ed Gillespie, in his "infinite wisdom" (he said while rolling his eyes), is sending out
three "leading" black Republicans to talk to business leaders around the nation.
This four-city trip is billed as an economic development tour, and is apparently geared toward minorities.
The problem -- and it's a big freakin' problem as I see it -- is that of the three blacks chosen, only one (Texas Insurance Commissioner Michael Williams) has any sort of credibility, and is the only one of the three that has the kind of political, business and social experience that the general public might even listen to.
The other two? Glad you asked.
The 2003 Miss America (that's right, a former beauty queen) Erika Harold and Don King.
You can close your mouth now.
Don King. As in "Only in America!"
As in the stick-your-finger-in-a-light-socket hairdo. And as in boxing promoter and heir to P.T. Barnum's salesmanship himself.
Gillespie is pushing this with a straight face.
With bullshit like this, is there any wonder that the GOP continues to play out of a hole when it comes to black America? Likewise, is there any wonder why many others (both black and white) find it hard to take black conservatives seriously?
You mean to tell me that the only viable black Republican voices that Ed Gillespie could find to talk to businessmen and women around the nation are Don King and the former Miss America?
This, truly is an insult to my intelligence, and to yours.
I just got another letter in the mail from the GOP begging for money. With crap like this, they'll be begging a long damn time before I throw good money away on 'em.
UPDATE (5/27, 9:30A): After sleeping on it, and talking to my wife (She-Who-Must-Be-Obeyed), I've calmed down a little.
While I still think that this is a bad move, perhaps I should sit back and watch what happens. After all, the people who attend are at least going to listen to the trio's message. And quiet as it's kept, there are a lot of folks who would listen to a Don King sooner than a Michael King. They certainly wouldn't call Don King an "oreo," though they'd be quick to call me one.
We'll have to see.
Posted by: mhking at
07:08 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 409 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Oh dear.
But y'know, I was skeptical of Gillespie's pushing Herman Cain to run for the Senate -- until I started hearing what Cain had to say.
This, too, could surprise me.
Posted by: McGehee at May 27, 2004 03:06 AM (lGoQn)
2
While Don King is one that is hard to take seriously, the former Miss America is not. If I remeber correctly, she is going to Harvard Law School.
Posted by: CoachVelt at May 27, 2004 05:10 AM (AaBEz)
3
Thanks, Mrs. Queen Boss Lady Numero Uno. Mike's lucky, 'cause I was fixin to show my feminine side. Yup.
With English Professor Dr. Huxtable correcting grammar at one end, along with Mega Street Cred Don King hittin' 'em from the other end, and King, Cobb, Barber & Co. - plus all of us in between, the blogheads - there might be some hope to reverse this disgusting trend.
Remember, and even I had forgotten the deeper meaning, that Daniel Patrick Moynihan pointed out this moral decay in the black family WAAAAY back in 1965!! And, needless to say, how we would pay dearly in years to come.
Now you know that if it was problematic then - to those that cared to SEE it - and growing, we have got to be close to going over the cliff now........no pun intended, Dr. Coz.
Drastic problems may, in this case, require a drastic solution. Sure, Don's a little sheisty, but he's very pro-America, and that could never hurt in Black America. He did the crime, did the time, and now look a Don.
Dare I say the black "Donald"? Never mind......I think I just went off the deep end with that dumbass remark.
Later!
Posted by: Beau at May 27, 2004 05:10 AM (GpmN8)
4
I feel you about Don King. However, you're wrong about Erika Harold. An airhead, she ain't. Erika has done extensive work around abstinence with the Illinois Family Institute, and has spoken at quite a few conservative venues (Eagle Forum, American Conservative Union) across the nation. She is a GOP convention delegate. Hell, she's been so vigilant that People for the American Way even has her on its "Right Wing Watch" list!
Given that it's blacks under 45 who are the ones increasingly likely to identify themselves as Republican or independent, putting her on the tour makes sense to me. I'd encourage you to please re-evaluate the snappy Harvard Law School lady.
Posted by: molotov at May 27, 2004 06:32 AM (h3FX8)
5
I'm hoping to hear Michael Williams speak at the Texas GOP Convention. I think he has much to say worth hearing.
Posted by: King of at May 27, 2004 06:40 AM (ktIW6)
6
Don King's probably the biggest name, and the other two do NOT sound like airheads, either. It might be a sad reflection on Americans, but they pay more attention to celebrities (Bennifer, anyone?) than they do do politicians.
Face it, maybe 1 out of 20 people in the country could identify J.C. Watts. 19 out of 20 could probably ID Don King.
Posted by: hchutch at May 27, 2004 06:56 AM (CF/QI)
7
Sticks and stones can . . .
Why do you care what a bunch of welfare pimps say. If they agree with you, then worry.
Posted by: erp at May 27, 2004 10:38 AM (MpKJk)
8
What, black businessmen are all of a sudden "welfare pimps"?
How much starch DO you use on your sheets?
Posted by: mhking at May 27, 2004 11:15 AM (KoiwA)
9
Don King . . . yuuuuuccckkkk!!!!
Posted by: Lola Lee at May 29, 2004 05:52 AM (pHF7u)
10
Don King has a lot to say about business and is a very strong supporter of GW.
I don't see the problem.
Posted by: DarkStar at June 01, 2004 07:13 PM (cnw1A)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Enterprise cliffhanger....
"I hate Illinois Nazis..."
Posted by: mhking at
04:41 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
1
o.O what did I miss...?
Posted by: Deb at May 26, 2004 05:04 PM (f6cjG)
2
You'll just have to watch the rerun on Saturday (?) to find out, Deb.
Posted by: McGehee at May 26, 2004 05:12 PM (lGoQn)
3
Ugh...this show is in trouble...I'm as big of a Trek fan as anybody, and I think we're in deep doodoo...
Posted by: Matt Hurley at May 26, 2004 05:20 PM (rqSKF)
4
I loved it.
It was probably the best trek cliffhanger since Best of Both Worlds.
Nobody expected a cliffhanger...nobody knew there was even going to be a season four until late last week.
Posted by: Zygote at May 26, 2004 05:25 PM (7cAgS)
5
Oh! lol I missed reading the title... saw "Illinois Nazis" and I.was.worried. *duh* I'll have to watch for the replay saturday
Posted by: Deb at May 26, 2004 06:49 PM (f6cjG)
6
You didn't misread my comment.
The quote fits. Take my word for it.
Posted by: mhking at May 26, 2004 06:55 PM (pN/8q)
7
I REALLY wish this would have ended the series on a high note. The mission successed, but at a cost, and the NX-01 is put in mothballs.
Nope, this show has to prove how good it is at pulling defeat from the edge of victory.
Posted by: frinklin at May 26, 2004 09:20 PM (6+H+U)
8
Yawn. Time travel, again, apparently.
How many times did Captain Kirk and crew go back in time? No more than four or five, certainly (including ST:IV, and only half of those were danger-of-changing-history situations.
By contrast, the writers of Star Trek have become increasingly reliant upon time travel as a plot device as the various series have progressed. With Archer and Daniels zipping to and from the 26th century practically every other episode, Jim Kirk will have the opportunity to read his entire captain's log by the time he makes ensign.
Come on, guys, come up with something original to base a cliffhanger on.
Posted by: Scott McClare at May 27, 2004 11:12 AM (LpZSK)
9
A good cliffhanger would have Scott Bakula "leaping" to his next mission.
Posted by: Rabbit at May 28, 2004 03:48 AM (4k1jT)
Posted by: jenny at July 30, 2011 01:11 PM (fEoCB)
Posted by: rosy at November 17, 2011 10:23 PM (d7Qlq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Be on the lookout for these bad guys -- they want to kill you
Here are the pictures everyone's been looking for.
Attorney General John Ashcroft says these folks -- and quite probably others -- are in the US and are leading up to an attack on American soil that would overshadow 9/11.
If you see these folks, get in touch with law enforcement immediately!
Posted by: mhking at
09:25 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 79 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I always just glance at these Wanted pictures, but this time I'm making it a point to really memorize. Who knows, it could mean a bunch of lives. I hope a lot of people do the same thing.
Posted by: Tom at May 26, 2004 04:16 PM (prtS9)
2
"
If you see these folks, get in touch with law enforcement immediately!"
I'll be getting in touch with my Smith & Wesson first...
Posted by: Jay G. at May 26, 2004 06:09 PM (lWLtT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The bad guys wanna hit us real hard, real soon...
The bad guys wanna hit us here. On shore. In the states.
They want to hit us hard this summer and inflict as many civilian casualties as they can muster.
The faces and names of seven individuals will be released at a 2P ET press conference this afternoon, acoording to Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Bob Mueller.
The alerts name people being sought for questioning -- not necessarily suspected of plotting attacks. They include descriptions and basic biographical information along with the photographs.The photographs and information will be sent to law enforcement agencies across the country and around the world, the sources said.
Supposedly, there isn't enough to raise the terror alert level (at least according to DHS Secretary John Ridge), but bottom line is to keep alert and watch yourself this summer.
There are several high profile events this summer -- the G8 Summit next month down at Sea Island, GA, of course plenty of Independance Day celebrations across the nation, the opening of the World War II Memorial on the Mall in Washington this weekend, not to mention the Democratic National Convention in Boston in July, and the Republican National Convention in New York City in early September.
There is also major concern relating to the Summer Olympic Games in August in Athens, Greece.
Posted by: mhking at
06:55 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 237 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'm old enough to remember the Munich Olympics. The Athens games have me worried.
Posted by: Fausta at May 26, 2004 07:50 AM (WhoVr)
2
Mike, you and I sat and watched the events at Munich unfold as we were playing a neighbors house back in Gary. This scares the crap out of me. Though our politics differ, this extends beyond that. I fear that we will see some tragic, historical events in the next few months. I pray that I am wrong.
Posted by: Coach Velt at May 26, 2004 08:06 AM (0GNJF)
3
>Supposedly, there isn't enough to raise the terror alert level (at least according to DHS Secretary John Ridge), but bottom line is to keep alert and watch yourself this summer.<<
This is code for "we're gonna raise it in a couple of days." How could they NOT?
Very scary stuff. We need to wipe these bastards off the face of the earth.
Posted by: Julie Anne Fidler at May 26, 2004 08:26 AM (b/7hi)
4
I don't want to sound jaded, but it seems to me the chatter generally ramps up like this just before any major U.S. holiday.
I applaud those in charge for responding to it every time, obviously.
Posted by: McGehee at May 26, 2004 10:26 AM (lGoQn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Other stuff television-wise
The Futon Critic continues it's look at the fall television season with some additional info that didn't show up in the upfront presentations last week.
It's a no-go on "Transylvania." Despite a hefty put pilot commitment when it was originally announced, NBC has opted not to go forward with the small screen spin-off of the current Universal feature "Van Helsing."-- UPN will look to expand to six nights starting next year. (CBS Head Leslie Moonves) wasn't specific on whether the new night will be Saturdays or Sundays.
-- "60 Minutes II" will drop the "II." "The Roman numeral II created some confusion on the part of the viewers and suggested a watered-down version," CBS News president Andrew Heyward told Daily Variety.
-- "The Simpsons" will once again earn a post-Super Bowl berth...after the game ends on February 6, 2005.
-- "Alias" is set to run repeat-free beginning in January. Aside from pre-emptions due to the Super Bowl and the Oscars, the fourth-year drama is set to run for 20 weeks on the network beginning in January.
-- UPN's "America's Next Top Model" and NBC's "The Apprentice" are both set to air two cycles next season. Both reality hits are slated to run for two cycles with "Model" running 26 installments and "Apprentice" a whopping 34 episodes over the course of the 2004-05 season.
-- "24" will open and close with two-hour installments as well as feature a two-hour special event episode in the middle of the season. Said moves are designed so that "24" will be able to run for 21 consecutive weeks beginning in January and close by the end of May sweeps.
TFC also reports that Fox won't give us any resolution to outcomes over their two cancelled (really trashy, but a guilty pleasure) reality shows,
Forever Eden and
Playing It Straight. Both shows tanked miserably in the ratings (and I'll admit to watching 'em, even if no one else will), and were yanked in mid run.
Straight had another four or five segments; Eden had another 16 to 18 episodes left to run.
It would make sense to play 'em out on FX if nowhere else, but hey, who knows what evil lurks in the mind of a network television programmer?
Posted by: mhking at
05:30 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 379 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Evil is definitely the word for someone who would fail to give Wonderfalls a chance. Luckily it will probably get released on DVD so we can see all 13 episodes. Yay!
Posted by: Jay Solo at May 26, 2004 07:25 AM (xrTDl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Islamic Call To Prayer to sound through streets of Detroit suburb
The Islamic
Call To Prayer will go forward in the Detroit suburb of Hamtramck, MI, starting Friday, after a petition drive by residents failed to stop it.
The petition drive was intended to stop a noise ordinance amendment regulating the religious messages. The City Council voted unanimously to reject the petitions and place the issue before city voters in the next election.“I am appalled by the level of racism I have seen,” Councilman Scott Klein said. “The people opposing this amendment (that allows the calls to prayer) have nothing on the boys from Birmingham (Ala.).”
But Robert Zwolak of Hamtramck, who led the petition drive, was just as upset by the council's actions.
“The damage has been done. This is Chernobyl,” Zwolak said, referring to the nuclear power plant disaster in Ukraine in 1986. “The fallout will last for many years.”
The city council determined that they did not have the right to regulate the hours when the prayer call would be broadcast through loudspeakers in the community.
The Muslim Call to Prayer will be announced in Arabic by loudspeaker five times per day beginning Friday afternoon.
The council fails to recognize that in their zeal to promote "diversity," that personal property rights are being trampled. Doesn't an individual have the right not to be disturbed by moose-like wailing five times per day in their own home?
This not a racial issue, as the liberal member of the city councl quoted above would have you believe, but a issue of community peace.
Posted by: mhking at
03:19 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 274 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Clearly those council members are unaware of the thousands of mosques in this country that manage
not to disturb the peace for miles around.
The noise is clearly therefore
not essential to the religious practice in question, and I do believe a sensible court (is that an oxymoron?) would find that the city council does have the right to regulate.
Posted by: McGehee at May 26, 2004 04:22 AM (lGoQn)
2
Were that my community, I would be SORELY tempted to upgrade my home stereo system to about 50,000 watts and play AC/DC's "Highway to Hell" after every announcement...
If the police harass me, I'd claim to be announcing the "Church of Angus" calling...
Posted by: Jay G at May 26, 2004 06:21 AM (1Z0tY)
3
I'm _almost_ suprise ACLU hasn't stepped in to scream about this. Almost. More baffled about their criteria in choosing their religion-based fights.
Posted by: Deb at May 26, 2004 06:32 AM (f6cjG)
4
Your freedom to swing your fist ends at the moment just before your fist connects with my nose! If these Muslims want to accelerate dislike and distrust of their religious beliefs, they have found the exact perfect way to do it!
I don't care who you are or what your reasons, disturbing the peace is disturbing the peace and woe betide anyone who does that to the average peaceful citizen. This story may just be beginning!
Posted by: Gayle Miller at May 26, 2004 09:39 AM (05zm9)
5
I don't get it. Why don't the complaintants do like liberals do - cherry-pick a judge and get them to order it halted?
Posted by: Rabbit at May 26, 2004 10:57 AM (4k1jT)
6
If I hear it there will be hell to pay. I don't want to hear anything those damn foriengers have to say over here. This is not their country. Their forefathers did not do a damn thing to make this a free country, the only thing they did do was stay in thier own country which is where they all need to go back to. Get the hell out of here, if you feel out of place or wanted it is because you are out of place and completely unwanted in this country. We are free because our fathers wanted us to be and faught for that right. The foriengers coming into this country now have no rights to the priveliges of the others already living here. Get out, get out, get out!
Posted by: Charlie at August 02, 2004 04:47 AM (kbF0e)
7
america, what a joke. your forefathers didnt fight for anything. look at the mess u made in iraq,vietnam. America=universally hated. charlie wat a looser america aint the world u no. America is a failure of a country
Posted by: oscar at October 16, 2004 10:02 AM (QaW+u)
8
america aint free u cant do shite.and thanks for ur help in the 2nd world war. 2 years late
hu the fuk do u think u are
Posted by: oscar at October 16, 2004 10:10 AM (QaW+u)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
130kb generated in CPU 0.0392, elapsed 0.4749 seconds.
57 queries taking 0.4468 seconds, 249 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.