June 07, 2004
Leave it to Allah to come home and offer appropriate humor...
Allah's back!After a hiatus, AllahPundit returns to the fold with....with.....well, you've just gotta see it for yourself....
Posted by: mhking at
06:27 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
Ted Rall blames 9/11 on Ronald Reagan
When I thought
moonbats like Rall couldn't go any lower, I get a look at his blog entry from yesterday.
How Sad......that Ronald Reagan didn't die in prison, where he belonged for starting an illegal, laughably unjustifiable war against Grenada under false pretenses (the "besieged" medical students later said they were nothing of the sort) and funneling arms to hostages during Iran-Contra.
Oh, and 9/11? That was his. Osama bin Laden and his fellow Afghan "freedom fighters" got their funding, and nasty weapons, from Reagan.
Anyway, I'm sure he's turning crispy brown right about now.
Is there any logical reason at all that any legitimate news agency is even contemplating putting or keeping this man (and I use the term loosely) on their payroll?
Posted by: mhking at
05:32 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 137 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Is there any logical reason at all that any legitimate news agency is even contemplating putting or keeping this man (and I use the term loosely) on their payroll?
Yes, because people still buy their papaers regardless of his presence. Because people still buy the products or services that are listed on the pages he spews his garbage upon. No one is suffering financially because of association with him.
The Free Market often ignores people like him.
Posted by: Marble at June 07, 2004 05:36 AM (VxPRK)
2
He spews the socialist line they love so well in news agencies. He will never hurt for a job.
Posted by: Deb at June 07, 2004 05:47 AM (f6cjG)
3
http://www.historic-battles.com/Articles/soviet_invasion_of_afghanistan.htm
The biggest problem with Rall comments is not that he is being a ass-hole. But the fact that he is wrong. Jimmy Carter actually started CIA funding Afghan freedom fighters.
I too believe Reagan is responsible for our current terrorism problem, but because he pulled out of lebanon just showing the Arab would we were had no staying power.
Bush is much better president than Reagan every was.
Posted by: Scott at June 07, 2004 05:56 AM (jfOL3)
4
Funny. Perhaps Rall should ask the Grenadians how they feel about the invasion (and I concur that the reasons were iffy, but the overall goal of preventing communism's spread in our backyard was not). The country's Thanksgiving is their national holiday honoring the U.S. troops who ousted their Marxist-revolutionary government that sent the country into civil war. Hence, the now democracy annually celebrate the invasion that Rall so derides!
Posted by: molotov at June 07, 2004 05:57 AM (h3FX8)
5
I think Marble's got it right.
Posted by: McGehee at June 07, 2004 06:30 AM (lGoQn)
6
Marble (above) is partially correct. People with messages like Rall's can get and retain positions at newspaper, TV, or online media because people write in about them. The newspapers don't differentiate between good mail and bad mail, the fact that they're getting mail means people are reading them.
The worst thing that can happen is if people ignore them. If people send in angry mail or even cancel their subscriptions the newspapers just promote the writer/cartoonist/wacko as controversial.
Posted by: Keith at June 07, 2004 06:39 AM (DrZwK)
7
Keith, what I meant wasn't that we should ignore him, but that a free market often provides shelter for wastes of oxygen such as Rall.
Canceling your newspaper or refusing to buy Kraft™ Bacon-Ranch dressing because of Rall is too much for most consumers. It is easier for people to ignore scum than it is to take a stand.
I don't get any newspaper that he writes for (at least, I don't think he's carried in the Tampa Tribune) so I can't cancel my subscription. I would have to actually purchase the periodicals that carry his load in order to find out who happened to be advertising on his page and then complain directly to them.
If anyone has that information, I'd be more than happy to write the PR departments of those companies. Heck, maybe that's something
Ted Rall is Full of Crap could help out with.
Posted by: Marble at June 07, 2004 07:31 AM (VxPRK)
8
Marble, I recognize that you weren't suggesting ignoring Rall (heretofore referred to as him, little "h") that was my suggestion. My thought was that all of the people upset at his posts are linking to them and driving his hit level up to unnatural levels and that he would continue to make similar statements as long as it gets him the attention he apparently craves.
On the other hand, insulting him until he goes away is a good plan too.
Posted by: Keith at June 07, 2004 06:38 PM (DrZwK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Jesse Jackson: 'Right Wing Is Not That Popular'
Jesse Jackson spoke at the closing luncheon of the
Take Back America conference in Washington last Friday, and continued his ongoing attack on conservatives.
"The right wing is not that popular. It is sustained by big money. We can have a poor campaign, a rich message, we can outwork [conservatives] because we have a higher sense of purpose, mission and need," Jackson told the crowd.
Jackson also took aim at the press, insisting that they were complicit in the Administration's plans -- ostensibly a bitch-fest due to the fact that he (Jackson) can't get as much television "face time" as he used to.
"One reason why America has been so slow to react [in opposition] to this war is because of misinformation and disinformation. Europeans have reacted with much greater reaction [opposing the war] because they have more options in the media. Our media gets in the bed with the military in wartime," Jackson told a reporter after his speech."The whole media got suckered into the [Bush administration's] disinformation campaign and therefore was disseminating misinformation," Jackson said.
"Their journalism is unabashedly political. The more people who see it for what it is worth, the more they look for a more fair, accurate, balanced reporting. There are facts and there is context and there is truth," Jackson said.
Jackson's speech became -- much as many others' at the confab, a stump speech for John Kerry and a bash-fest on President Bush.
"George Bush campaigned as a compassionate conservative, implying that he was less dismissive of civil rights and labor than [former president Ronald] Reagan was and more open than his father (former president George H. Bush). But [Bush] has been a closed-door conservative," Jackson said."We can do better than George Bush as president," he added to loud applause.
Jackson also addressed some of the liberal activists' disappointment about Sen. John F. Kerry's stance on the Iraq War.
"For us, the issue is not should be we be on Kerry's ticket -- put Kerry on our ticket, we need him as president," he said to applause. A petition circulating among the liberal activists at the event asked for signatures to pressure Kerry to "present a plan to withdraw from Iraq." Kerry, the presumed Democratic presidential nominee, has been accused by some fellow Democrats of straddling the Iraq war issue.
Jackson's visceral hatred is so blatantly obvious in each of his speeches. Jackson attempts to get more face-time to make sure his own agenda stays in front of the American people. But on the whole, many people have seen Jackson for the charlatan that he is and has become.
Posted by: mhking at
02:36 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 436 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Since when do Europeans have more options in the media? USA has conservative, moderate, and liberal media in spades: print, TV, Internet. Europe has the first two in way less abundance, and the last is everywhere. Let's not forget that much of their media is government-owned. What Rev really means is that European media is socialist, which he loves.
Posted by: molotov at June 07, 2004 04:08 AM (h3FX8)
2
Speaking of the weak Euros, boy do we miss that Margaret Thatcher, The Great "Lady Thatcher" and her firm leadership.
A strong conservative and principled woman she is............who, ironically, saved England from economic ruin the same way Ronald Reagan saved us from Jimmy Carter ruin.
What a weak president Carter was, and a weak man he remains.........absolutely worshipped in Europe.
Not to mention, not feared very much by muslim terrorists that wanna kill & maim us, all of whom - along with Jesse Jackson & Osama Bin Laden - will be voting for Mr. Kerry.
Great company.
Posted by: Beau at June 07, 2004 04:49 AM (GpmN8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 06, 2004
Leave it to Danny Glover to piss on the flowers at the funeral home
Danny Glover, still ticked off at conservatives for raining on his personal parade (i.e.,
Aristide's Haitiaan Adventure), has elevated the aforementioned mudslinging into the mainstream.
"We all know Reagan's legacy, from the Iran-Contra affair to the funding of the Nicaraguan military in which over 200,000 people died. The groundwork for the move steadily to the right happened with the Reagan administration. People want to elevate him to some mythic level; they have their own reason for doing that." -- actor Danny Glover, at an anti-war rally in Los Angeles.
This Blog is Full of Crap said it best.
Only a few actors can make the transition from acting to national politics without coming across as a jackass.Reagan. Fred Thompson, and Arnold come to mind.
Danny doesn't. Maybe he's just still pissed over Paul Robeson or something.
Just damn, indeed.
Posted by: mhking at
08:35 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 165 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Bill Cosby was absolutely, 100% correct. We have to stop blaming Whites for the deeply dysfunctional behavior of the Black underclass. We have huge problems facing that part of the Black community - drugs, crime, Black-on-Black violence, the huge numbers of Black men in the criminal justice system, AIDS and "down low" bisexuality, gangs, Black disdain for education as "acting White", fatherless families, rampant teen pregnancy and a 73% illegitimacy rate, lack of respect for the larger society, and a subculture that glorifies "thug life". But the biggest problem is that we still are unwilling to face these problems head-on and at least admit that virtually all of them are self-inflicted. "We" have to fix "us". Thanks, Bill Cosby, and Amen! I appreciate you speaking truth to ignorance. We need to stop blaming Whites for our own self-inflicted problems, we need to get over this "cult of victimhood" mentality (nod to Professor John McWhorter), and we have to admit that the Black underclass bears almost all the responsibility for its current sorry condition. It's just that simple. One final point - I think we should nominate Bill Cosby to be the next president of the NAACP. I'm serious. Cosby just did more to help Black America in one 30 minute speech than Kwesei Mfume has done in the last five years.
Posted by: Jamaal Michaels at June 06, 2004 12:10 PM (oRgtv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Both of 'em on the rebound...
Jennifer Lopez
married latin singing star Marc Anthony in a surprise ceremony yesterday.
We all know about J-Lo's love live, thanks to E! & Entertainment Tonight, but most people don't know as much about Anthony.
Anthony just got a quickie divorce in the Dominican Republic from his prior wife of four years, former Miss Universe Dayanara Torres.
Considering that Lopez is the contemporary version of Elizabeth Taylor, hopping from beau to beau with the frequency of a locust in heat, I suppose that Anthony's being on the rebound shouldn't be much of a surprise.
Posted by: mhking at
06:30 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 106 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Unfortunately, I think she's given up looking for love and just going for the Elizabeth-Taylor-married-7-times routine.
Posted by: La Shawn Barber at June 06, 2004 04:25 PM (tW8zw)
2
The girl in the Univision news this morning said, "I give them two years and a baby girl".
And you're right on the contemporary ETaylor, since ET's long been famous for being famous.
Posted by: Fausta at June 07, 2004 08:39 AM (WhoVr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 05, 2004
New Wayans Bros. Movie: "White Chicks"
Why!?!!???
Posted by: mhking at
06:28 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It's official. Marlon and Shawn have jumped the shark.
Posted by: Darmon Thornton at June 05, 2004 06:48 PM (u4t6f)
2
Agree 110%. Imagine, if you will, Benn Affleck and Matt Damon doing a BLACK CHICKS movie.
Arrrgh.
Posted by: Aaron's Rantblog at June 06, 2004 04:05 AM (UxMXb)
Posted by: Beck at June 06, 2004 08:35 PM (fllfQ)
4
Two things about this movie drive me nuts, I mean, beyond the fact that it exists.
First, not 1 but 2 people where I work have told me how funny it looks.
Second, I see the trailer every DAMN time I go to the movies!
Posted by: frinklin at June 06, 2004 08:53 PM (O54b8)
5
I know everything I could possibly know up to this point about white chicks, having grown up with countless numbers of 'em........thank you very much The Wayans Family.
Ditto for black chicks, hispanic chicks, asian chicks, mulatto chicks, and all other combinations of mixed-race chicks.
This is almost as bad as Spike Lee talking about whites while claiming objectivity - that lil' short, sawed-off racist bastard.
Needless to say, not all of our parents were segregationist negros hell bent on producing angry, narrow-minded, and very shallow black intellects.
Posted by: Beau at June 07, 2004 07:47 AM (GpmN8)
6
Yeaaaaa, im not so sure about this movie and how PC it is. All i know is im NOT going to give 9 bux to the corporate fat cats in order for me to devise an opinion about this piece of trash racist movie.... anyone feel like acting in a movie with me? well call it big black dudes....no? yea, id probally get sued and titled a racist by most of America but what the hell i guess Aferican Americans are allowed to crossdress/cross-race without hassle. Wait, was'nt there a huge court case during the late 80s or early 90s where that white guy was arrested for dressing up as a black male? Hummm? makes you think.
Posted by: Rocco mannetti at June 20, 2004 07:01 AM (xiPaH)
7
I love the wayans bros i just can't wait to see the movie. By the way is marlon single? he is so cute.
Posted by: brini at June 23, 2004 01:45 PM (YIwCz)
8
Brini, you're a smacktard.
Posted by: antiBrini at June 24, 2004 03:01 PM (tlA46)
9
HEY ANTIBRINI.. GET OVA T. DA MOVIES WUS DA BOMB... GET OVA T MOVE AND LEAVE THE WAYANS BRO ALONE.... GET A LYF STUPD BASTARD.... GO THE WAYANS BRO... ALL DA WAE BABYYYYYYYY.....
Posted by: G-RAK at August 18, 2005 12:42 PM (NF3Ku)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Let the mudslinging begin...
The left has lost little time in beginning their smearing of Reagan.
CNN: Reagan will be remembered for his action against the air traffic controller's union
Reagan not only fired the controllers but also refused to negotiate with the union while it was on strike. "You can't sit and negotiate with a union that's in violation of the law," he said.
MSNBC's Lester Holt made certain that everyone remembered that "massive social program cuts" occured under the Reagan watch.
ABC blamed Reagan for the deaths of the Marines in the barracks bombing in Lebanon in their highlight reel.
Iran Contra came the cry from CBS, followed by sneering highlights of Reagan "capitolizing financially" after leaving office.
The only positive note to come from the "alphabet networks" on Reagan was that he was responsible for the end of the Cold War. No mention of the beginning of the upward trend for the economy; no mention of the surge in jobs; no mention of America's excellence under Reagan.
I won't even mention the cheering coming from places like Democratic Underground.
No matter. Rest well, Gipper. God has a wonderful place prepared for you.
More coverage from Wizbang, Zygote, VodkaPundit, Useful Fools, Lopsided Poopdeck (in their new location!), Spot On, Kevin McCullough, Ipse Dixit, Incite, Oliver Willis, Outside the Beltway, DC Thornton, and a bazillion other folks...
Posted by: mhking at
02:51 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 230 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The posts on the Democratic Underground are enough to make my stomach turn.
While I despised Clinton, I would never, ever say what some in the DU are saying about Reagan. I wasn't aware such ugliness existed — and if we lived in the nation of hope and optimism that Reagan wanted for America, it wouldn't.
Posted by: Zygote at June 05, 2004 03:37 PM (7cAgS)
2
Sam Donaldson called him a "man of contradictions" who came to Washington to cut taxes but left us with a massive deficit. It was about 20 minutes after the announcement of Reagan's death.
Posted by: Mud Blood & Beer at June 05, 2004 04:03 PM (1t2R+)
3
President Ronald Reagan was a lovely, charming man with his head on straight. Perfect? No, he was human like us all. His clear thinking, plain speaking and sheer determination to make things in the world better is something that they will envy for quite some time to come.
Jealousy is an ugly thing.
Posted by: Deb at June 05, 2004 04:08 PM (f6cjG)
4
Classy (but unsurprising) of you, MHK, to tout Willis while he holds you up as a negative example. Reagan had many historic goals, and he achieved all save the deficit--the Dems' version, Clinton, achieved none save Reagan's elusive surplus (and by co-opting a right-leaning program!). Who was the President who remarked about achievements and not caring who got credit? God Bless Mr. Reagan!
Posted by: Chris at June 05, 2004 07:54 PM (WWz6o)
5
Greatest. President. Ever.
They will gag on every word of praise they are forced to say.
Let's go out and win one for the Gipper!
Posted by: Pat Curley at June 05, 2004 09:08 PM (XQEqy)
6
Reagan almost single handedly saved us from Orwell's 1984.
Just like there's a special place in heaven reserved for him, there's a special place in hell reserved for network anchors and the rest of the vile leftwing nutcases out there still trying to defile him.
That he never deigned to notice the little rodents nipping at his feet marked him as a true gentleman.
Old Confucius saying goes something like this -- When the student is ready, the teacher appears. American translation -- The Calvary is coming. It came and brought just the right man for the job.
God's speed.
Posted by: erp at June 06, 2004 02:59 AM (INLNZ)
7
Believe it, Zygote. Last night I had an argument with a close friend and her husband. My friend claimed that the 1980s were "the worst decade for black folks ever." Of course, I brought sanity into the conversation and asked if that included our 40 decades under slavery, the 1870s when we were sold out in the Hayes-Tilden Compromise which ushered in Jim Crow, or the 8 decades suffered under Jim Crow. She said yes! She then proceeded to shout me down (can liberals ever have a civil discussion, I asked her) and then abruptly ended the conversation saying that we should never discuss politics again.
I thought conservatives were over the top when they said that liberal thought is totalitarian when it comes to other viewpoints, but more and more I'm (libertarian) seeing it. Mind you, I'm not even a Reagan lover (liked his Cold War activities and personal responsibility rhetoric, disliked his domestic politics of driving up the deficit...and his past opposition to the original Civil Rights Act and hypocritical gun control against the Panthers) but liberals just cannot allow common sense to overcome their hatred.
Posted by: shay at June 06, 2004 06:32 AM (h3FX8)
8
Great man. Greatest president of my lifetime - 1st I ever voted for, did it twice. It was so much fun STOMPING and CRUSHING the democrats in 80 & 84. And all you Clinton-Lovers can SHUT the hell up!!!
Joined the Army to be a Ranger SPECIFICALLY to fight for President Reagan. I'd swear I even did 2-3 Ollie North missions in a support role for Marine Force Recon - why else would they've given us live ammo in the 80s? But if I told ya.....I'd have to kill ya. Regardless, proud to have served under him.
As is the case with Mr. Limbaugh, still can't understand why most blacks bitched & moaned - and continue to bitch and moan, ad nauseum - about either of them.
Not to mention, with outright lies designed to have younger blacks like me carry their excess baggage. (I am talking to YOU - NAACP & CBC, among others.) Screw that; don't tell me what to think. Saved our asses from Jimmy Carter, that blind, naive, fool.
So "common sensy" was President Reagan in things he spoke of, in ways that any reasonable, grounded, and reality-based person would recognize. Then again, that could not possibly include liberals - out there in LaLa Land with their idealistic bullcrap. Makes me wanna puke. (GAG!)
On 2nd thought, got his auto bio right in front of me.....An American Life. Think I'll read it again.
Posted by: Beau at June 07, 2004 03:21 AM (GpmN8)
9
Nice work, Michael. I grew up with this man as President, and I already miss him terribly. He was huge, and we were blessed to have him.
Posted by: Jared at June 10, 2004 07:18 AM (IZmGb)
10
Folks...
It is better to remain silent and appear a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Posted by: Francis Bacon at June 12, 2004 08:43 AM (2r23O)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Ronald Wilson Reagan; 1911-2004
Posted by: mhking at
02:14 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
Smarty Jones' picture a year from now...
Posted by: mhking at
01:54 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I've been following the Reagan coverage.
I guess Smarty Jones didn't win, huh?
Posted by: The Commissar at June 05, 2004 05:05 PM (k+ZOU)
2
Quit horsing around and *stick* to politics.
*runs* *ducks* and *covers*
Posted by: Guy S. at June 05, 2004 06:25 PM (f6cjG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 04, 2004
CNN touts Bubba for VP, despite Constitutional prohibition
From CNN's
profiles of Democratic Vice Presidential contenders:
Bill Clinton
Few vice-presidential possibilities boast the accomplished resume -- or political baggage -- of former President Bill Clinton. Clinton studied at Georgetown, Yale and Oxford (as a Rhodes scholar) before returning to his home state of Arkansas. He taught at the University of Arkansas' law school for three years before, at 30, being elected the state's attorney general. Clinton later served six terms as Arkansas' governor (he won in 1978, lost a 1980 race, then was re-elected two years later), before defeating incumbent George H.W. Bush to become U.S. president, starting in January 1993. While federal law prohibits a person from seeking a third presidential term, the Constitution does not specify whether or not a former commander in chief can become vice president.
CNN has conveniently ignored the 12th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
...no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.
If you take a look at that page, you'll see a lot of other names tossed out as Veep material, including retiring NBC anchor Tom Brokaw and Senator Shrillary herself.
Sounds more and more like impartiality is not part of the vocabulary down at the Death Star downtown.
Posted by: mhking at
04:16 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 225 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Heard Brokaw's name bantered about before. Hillary won't as she wants it in '08. My guess would be Edwards. But who knows what the DNC will come up with at the convention. (Would Hillary run if she was nominated at the convention? Or is that too far fetched, even considering the state the Dems are currently in?)
Posted by: Guy S. at June 04, 2004 06:39 PM (f6cjG)
2
It's an old joke but still relevant: If Kerry wants to balance the ticket, he can always be his own running-mate.
Posted by: McGehee at June 05, 2004 06:30 AM (lGoQn)
3
Do you imagine that anyone at CNN has ever bothered to read the Constitution? Do you think they care what it says? Does
anyone care what it says anymore?
Posted by: Mud Blood & Beer at June 05, 2004 07:47 PM (1t2R+)
4
Utter.....bleepin.....desperation.
(R.I.P. Liberalism)
Posted by: Beau at June 07, 2004 03:24 AM (GpmN8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
CNN getting caught in it's own lie
As expected, crowds of protestors have greeted President Bush in Italy, where he is on a state visit ahead of this weekend's D-Day anniversary ceremonies in France.
CNN is reporting that protesters are numbering around a half-million.
Protesters swarmed the streets of central Rome after Bush met with Pope John Paul II, one of the strongest critics of the war. Police estimated the number of demonstrators at 500,000.
While the
BBC has the number of protesters at a far more realistic 25,000, also based on police estimates.
Organisers say 150,000 people have turned out for the protest, while police put the figure at 25,000.
So which is it, CNN? 25,000 or a half-million? Anything to slander Bush and further your own so-called unbiased agenda?
Posted by: mhking at
11:35 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 134 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hey, don't get worked over error of an order of magnitude difference. The important thing is to make Bush look bad.
Posted by: BigFire at June 04, 2004 01:40 PM (w6uPn)
2
Chrenkoff today has a good one, too, on this subject "Bush: Liberation of Rome a "mistake" http://chrenkoff.blogspot.com
Posted by: Fausta at June 05, 2004 07:04 AM (WhoVr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
CNN has the billboard now...
Remember
that billboard facing CNN Center and Centennial Olympic Park in downtown Atlanta from a few weeks back? You know the one, that said, "Come Home Connie, CNN Needs You."
The billboard had been the subject of a dispute between the sign's owner and Fox News Channel, the primary tenant of that billboard since 1999.
FNC wanted to place a message that, like it's predecessors, poked fun at CNN, but at the end said "Send resumes to 'Resumes-AT-foxnews.com.'"
The sign's new owners didn't think the message was funny and refused to place the billboard. Fox threatened to sue, claiming that the new owners were in cahoots with CNN.
The story went quiet for awhile; the new FNC billboard went up late last week without the resume line, only to be replaced with a CNN billboard early this week.
No one's talking about how it played out, but I'm sure some dollars exchanged hands across the board. And now that CNN's got the billboard, I'm sure no one else will get to put a message on it anytime soon.
Posted by: mhking at
06:15 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 188 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You're wrong. Any number of other people will be able to put a message on CNN's billboard. People that are leftwing nutcases will be featured. Ads for Moore's lastest opus or perhaps a running list of war dead ala Andy, he should be ruined, Rooney. Candid shots of Arabs wearing women's underwear on their heads. You get the picture.
You'll have ample opportunity to raise your blood pressure in the coming weeks and months.
Allah Akbar
Posted by: erp at June 05, 2004 08:44 AM (te2+z)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
OJ's talks about a new tv gig and about Nicole on anniversary of murder
OJ Simpson,
in an television interview with Greta Van Susteren to be broadcast this week on Fox News Channel, says that he's working on a new television show.
Simpson said, "It's a takeoff on something called 'Punk'd,' " an MTV hidden-camera show featuring Ashton Kutcher pranks on celebrities. "It's me doing gags as Juice ... what they call 'juicing' people."
In the interview, Simpson also talks about his wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, who was brutally murdered June 12, 1994.
"There are times I am angry at her," the NFL Hall of Famer said in comments Fox News Channel aired last night. "There are things that she could be doing with the kids better than I, you know? When it's emotional stuff, especially with my daughter, I am angry with her. I am angry that she found herself hanging out with the group of — who are these people?"
Simpson was accused and acquitted of the murder of Nicole and her friend, Ron Goldman in the 1994 slayings, but later found liable in a civil trial.
Since families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman were awarded $33.5 million in damages in 1997, Simpson and his children have lived quietly in Miami on a $4 million pension that is exempt from civil-court judgments.
Posted by: mhking at
02:44 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 237 words, total size 2 kb.
June 03, 2004
MayahMar'nBar' is gonna run for DC City Council
Everyone's favorite former mayor-turned-druggie (remember "The bitch set me up!"), former DC mayor Marion Barry is floating suggestions that
he's going to run for a city council seat in the Nation's Capitol.
Barry was forced out of office after an undercover drug arrest in 1990.
Barry is not saying he's running himself; he seems to enjoy playing coy with the local press.
No, the most recent rumblings come from Council member Sandy Allen. Allen told reporters this week that Barry said that he was definitely going to run against Allen for her 8th Ward seat in the September 14 Democratic Primary.
A showdown between Barry, 68, and Allen, 53, in the Sept. 14 Democratic primary would make for fascinating political theater. Barry is, of course, the former "mayor for life" who was disgraced after being videotaped smoking crack cocaine in an FBI sting at the Vista Hotel in 1990.Barry was convicted of one misdemeanor count of drug possession later that year and served six months in prison. But he ran for and won the Ward 8 council seat in 1992 and was reelected as mayor in 1994. Three years later, he announced that he would not seek a fifth term, opening the door for the election of Mayor Anthony A. Williams (D).
Barry has until July 7 to qualify for the September election.
Posted by: mhking at
05:23 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 240 words, total size 2 kb.
1
As a DC resident, this scares the hell outta me! I love this city, but if he's elected to political office, I think I might have to move!
Posted by: Stone at June 03, 2004 05:58 PM (Lw9Py)
2
Good Lord, does this man EVER go away?
Posted by: frinklin at June 03, 2004 08:09 PM (O54b8)
3
Stone- I'm also a DC resident and I know he just might win! As if the people on the DC council aren't bad enough, now the citizens may want to bring back the man who turned DC into a national joke.
Michael- MayahMar'nBar': Hysterical!
Posted by: La Shawn Barber at June 04, 2004 05:08 AM (Qa+f/)
4
Well, that
IS pretty much how it got pronouced back when we lived up there... [g]
Posted by: mhking at June 04, 2004 05:19 AM (tgIqB)
5
Oh, and Stone? Atlanta is wonderful this time of year... [g]
Posted by: mhking at June 04, 2004 05:20 AM (tgIqB)
6
Man!! Now that'll be a smoke-filled room!!
"Ah, Mr. Burry.......Murrian!! Pass the blunt, boy!! And don't be bogardin the pipe when it comes around, either. Now, let's hit the package store & head to Haynes Point......forget the agenda."
Posted by: Beau at June 04, 2004 06:18 AM (GpmN8)
7
Haines Point -- talk 'bout bringing back some memories...[g]
Posted by: mhking at June 04, 2004 06:45 AM (tgIqB)
8
Don't even start, Mike....I'm old school - lived in SE/SW D.C. for a couple/few years when I was college-aged.
Was Haines Point the next best thing to church on Sundays, or what?
DISCLAIMER: Umm, I said SECOND best, Lashawn(WINK).
Or maybe some Najee & George Duke at Fort Dupont Park?
How 'bout your favorite jazz musicians at the Carter Barron Amphitheater? (I luuuuuv DC)
And NO, Mike,, we won't be thuggin at Anacostia Park watching any Rare Essence, Mass Extinction, Trouble Funk.........or EU, for that matter.
Dem days is done; we're older & wiser now.
Later!
Posted by: Beau at June 04, 2004 07:16 AM (GpmN8)
9
"Doin' it in the park!
Doin' it after dark!
Oh, yeah, Rock Creek Park,
Oh, yeah, Rock Creek Park..."
You want memories? I restored a '74 MGB - new top and all - we lived a couple blocks off of Beach Drive (16th & Eastern & Colesville). There was nothing like doin' Rock Creek Park all the way downtown with the top down at full speed...
Posted by: mhking at June 04, 2004 07:33 AM (tgIqB)
10
Ah-haaah........convoyed down a few tims to Kings Dominion in an MG or MGB (78 or 79 model) and a Fiat X1/9 - memba dat? Then I destroyed the renowned King Cobra rollercoaster each trip.........first car, dawg!!! Small world.
The Blackbyrds? Got that joint on an Old School CD. Might have to pop it in on the way home.
I was over around MLK Jr. & Portland, down the street from St. Elizabeths and The MANHOLE (don't ask - I was young), and Kenny & Paul's Barber Shop. Yeah!!!
Thanks for the nostalgia.
Posted by: Beau at June 04, 2004 08:36 AM (GpmN8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
CIA Director Tenet is out, and it's about damn time!
George Tenet, director of the CIA, has finally figured out how to use the doorknob.
I hope it doesn't hit him in the ass on the way out.
More coverage from Herr Puppy Blender, Smash, A Small Victory, AlphaPatriot, Bushblog, Mon Capitain, Crow, Bill Hobbs, that Other King guy, Oliver Willis, Rob Bernard, Wizbang and damn near everybody else on my blogroll...
Posted by: mhking at
06:40 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 82 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hmm...I've been promoted again. Now I'm
King of Other.
Posted by: King of Fools at June 03, 2004 06:48 AM (ktIW6)
2
Hey, I've still gotta be at the top of the list! [g]
Posted by: mhking at June 03, 2004 06:49 AM (LT8W0)
3
Clinton holdovers. Maybe Bush will be a quicker study in his second term.
Posted by: La Shawn Barber at June 03, 2004 07:08 AM (Qa+f/)
4
Now we won't have to hear the words Clinton Apointee and Director of the CIA in the same phrase anymore(unless the word former is also present)
Posted by: Jonathan at June 03, 2004 06:03 PM (jHWqp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Who says the press doesn't have a sense of humor?
From this morning's
NY Post:
Posted by: mhking at
05:44 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Fausta at June 03, 2004 06:20 AM (WhoVr)
2
Look-ah-dat!! A face ONLY a terrorist could love.
(God, please don't let him get elected)
Posted by: Beau at June 03, 2004 06:34 AM (GpmN8)
3
Ahhh...there you go Beau 'Terrorist'...George W's latest addition to his limited vocabulary...God won't have to get Kerry elected 'cos DECENT AMERICANS WILL
Posted by: Gerry at June 03, 2004 09:56 AM (S1nA7)
4
'Preciate the luv, Gerry.
I really hate saying this (liar-liar-pants-on-fire), but let's just hope YOUR MOTHER isn't around when Kerry's terrorist - oops, sorry bout that - friends get here even quicker.
Assuming your mother is still alive, of course, not that I was hoping she wasn't.
Okay, Mike, what's my penance? Hate to be unnecessarily crude, but couldn't turn the other cheek as I had originally planned. And Gerry's momma is fair game.
Posted by: Beau at June 03, 2004 10:15 AM (GpmN8)
5
ahhh, I see the comments are *lurching* right along.
It should be noted that as apposed to Kerry's *dubious* purple hearts, Lurch was born(?) with one *grin*
Posted by: Guy S. at June 04, 2004 08:05 AM (f6cjG)
6
Actually, that's a particulatly un-Lurchlike photo of Kerry. And Lurch kinda looks like George Harrison in that one!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at June 06, 2004 07:44 PM (pKu2s)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NAACP calls Republicans "terrorists" against blacks
At the "Take Back America" conference in Washington yesterday, NAACP Chairman Julian Bond
compared Republicans to the Taliban, the terrorists who used to rule Afghanistan.
"Their idea of equal rights is the American flag and the Confederate swastika flying side by side," Bond told a cheering audience. "They've written a new constitution for Iraq and ignore the Constitution here at home. They draw their most rabid supporters from the Taliban wing of American politics. Now they want to write bigotry back into the Constitution."
He offered no proof to support his "bigotry" comment. It's far easier for Bond and others to allow emotion to rule the day.
Bond called the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965 two of America's greatest achievements. Of course, he neglected the simple fact that the Republicans of the day were instrumental in pushing both Acts through. Had the Democrats of the 1960s prevailed, neither act would have become law, and blacks would have continued to be relegated to the "back of the bus."
"The passage of these two laws in 1964 and 1965 marked the beginning of the dependence of the Republican Party on the politics of racial division to win elections and gain power," Bond said. "By playing the race card in election after election, they've appealed to that dark underside of American culture, to that minority of Americans who reject democracy and equality. They preach racial neutrality and they practice racial division.""We have a president who talks like a populist and governs for the privileged," Bond said. "We were promised compassionate conservatism; instead, we got crummy capitalism."
The NAACP claims to be a non-partisan organization -- they have to remain non-partisan in order to retain their tax exempt status.
After similarly partisan statements by Bond at their convention last summer, a number of critics of the civil rights organization called for the removal of their tax exempt status. In an interview on MSNBC's Scarborough Country last July, I pointed out (much to the chagrin of fellow guest Roland Martin) that Bond's statements would make it easy for the federal government to withdraw that exemption.
Bond's statements make it crystal clear that the NAACP has no desire to work together with Republicans to make things better for all people.
The NAACP's 2004 National Convention is July 10-15 in Philadelphia. I'm sure we will hear much more in the way of venomous rage and true hate speech from Bond and his cohorts then.
Posted by: mhking at
02:59 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 422 words, total size 3 kb.
1
As is your habit, Mike, looks like you pretty much covered it, Mike, so no smart-ass remarks from me........I don't think. Like Lyndon Johnson had to threaten the Republicans to vote for those much needed amendments.
And that Julian Bond, what's his deal? Is he another (looks like) liberal white man that is hell bent on proving his BLACKNESS with these asinine statements?
No wonder I won't be respecting any LIBERAL older blacks until it's extended to me. Contrary to what Bill Cosby said or very much implied - it aint just his age group peers from poorer neighborhoods that have SCREWED UP our communities.
That is why I am suspect of the vast majority of my elders, to include just about all of our so-called leaders & elected officials - most in their late 40s and up. Then they open their mouths.........confirming that I can save my respect for someone else. And my filthy mouth.
Posted by: Beau at June 03, 2004 05:24 AM (GpmN8)
2
Looks like Mr. Bond was too consumed with spewing biggoted hate speech to be bothered with a little tiny thing like... justifying his claims. Too bad for him, someone in his position should at least try to give the appearance of intelligence.
Posted by: Deb at June 03, 2004 09:08 AM (f6cjG)
3
The "write bigotry back into the Constitution" line probably refers to the the Federal Marriage Amendment; pretty sure I heard him describe it that way in another speech.
You maybe want to take that up with whoever wrote the linked article, rather than Mr. Bond.
Charming folk you have commenting here, Michael.
Posted by: Aaron at June 03, 2004 04:45 PM (jizJ0)
4
Good point, Aaron; I'd like to hear the context of that statement though.
Thanks for swinging by; I'm glad you could join us -- at least this once...[g]
Posted by: mhking at June 03, 2004 05:10 PM (9/+pc)
5
Julian Bond is right. The passage of the Civil Rights Acts led to the Republican Party's Southern Strategy. It was, and is, to woo Southern whites based on their resentment of the end of segregation, and, the progress made by people of color since then. The GOP has usually carried the South because of its Southern Strategy. This is pretty basic history. Any person who is at all well-read would be aware of it.
I was hoping to see some improvement in Michael King's blog. But, it is still just mindless echoing of whatever far Right white people say.
Posted by: Mac Diva at June 03, 2004 07:43 PM (I7z5C)
6
"Mindless?"
Does this mean that
your blog is similarly reflective of what the far left parrots?
What sort of "improvement" were you looking for? That I renounce my conservatism? That I join the lock-stepping masses who find it easy to bash anyone who has a thought that is different from their own? That I not do anything to upset the apple cart?
Please. Spare me. I don't expect you to understand.
Or to put it bluntly, I don't give a shit whether you see an "improvement" or not.
I don't claim to be a genius; I don't claim to have all the answers. But I do step out of the "blame whitey, whack the Republican" mindset that you seem to love so damn much.
If you don't like it, then go find someone else to bitch at.
Posted by: mhking at June 04, 2004 01:44 AM (9/+pc)
7
My blogs don't echo anybody. I bring my own informed opinions to the table. If someone taking a Leftist position is guilty of sloppy thinking, he or she is gonna catch Hell just as much as a Right Winger would.
But, the Right is wrong more often.
I wrote an
entry, 'How to Be a Bad Blogger,' for my civil rights blog which is a critique of your blog in 2003. It criticized you for shallowness, copyright violations right and left and failure to grasp the difference between fact and opinion. More than a year later, your blog is still an embarrassment to anyone who wants blogging to be taken seriously. At the very least you could read the news articles you steal without attribution closely enough to make sure what you say about them is accurate.
Posted by: Mac Diva at June 06, 2004 11:56 AM (8udrE)
8
Julian Bond's words were just more of the same old vicious, hypocritical hate speech we get all the time from the extremist fringes of the Left. All Bond is doing is throwing red meat to his fellow Democrats. Nobody really listens to him, because he and others of his ilk sound like a broken record, playing the same thing over and over again.
Posted by: Jamaal Michaels at June 06, 2004 12:15 PM (oRgtv)
9
Oh, gee. How very kind of you.
Let me make sure I understand how it works.
You have issues with me; you write a scathing review of my work with some valid points, and some knee-jerk opinions; you don't say a damn thing to me about it; then you come back a year later and do the same thing, only this time with a backhanded slap.
Hmmmm. Excuse me if I don't think much of your opinion.
You don't like me, that's your business. But last I checked, you weren't the be-all, end-all arbiter of what is right and what is not. At the very least, if there was
that much an issue, you would have at least have had the common courtesy to say something to me to begin with.
But I guess that was too easy. Just like it's too easy to bitch at me today.
Obviously, you feel that someone died and made you the bitch queen goddess of all that blogs are and are made of.
There are certainly blogs better than mine; there are certainly blogs worse than mine. I can only conclude that your selection of mine to bitch at then and now is solely based on your politcal differences with me and my views.
Thank you for the bitchslap. Don't do it again.
Posted by: mhking at June 06, 2004 12:24 PM (j0jrQ)
10
Can't we Americans - white, black, yellow, brown, purple - get along? I hate it when something like a disaster happens and we blame the white President when the affected ones do not get an immediate assistance from the federal government?
Everyone was overwhelmed by the gravity of the situation. No one could have predicted the enormous destructions brought by Katrina. I hate it when race becomes a factor when this type of incident happens. Reminds of an incident during the American Idol show - when a black contestant lost to a white contestant and blacks cited rate as the reason why the black constestant lost. Pls give me a break.
Posted by: alfred at September 12, 2005 05:38 PM (vVr4Y)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 02, 2004
Wild lynx on the loose in Atlanta
After Mount Paran area resident Woodrow Vaughn
snapped pictures of the big cat on his back porch Monday, he said it was about the size of a golden retriver.
Residents of the Atlanta north side neighborhood have been seeing what they have nicknamed "Sasquatch" for the past week or so now.
Fulton County Animal Control Director David Smith says it's probably a lynx, a wildcat native to Canada and the northern US. It's diet is mostly rodents.
"It's a really big kitty cat," said Fulton Animal Control director David Smith. "They do have real sharp teeth and real big claws and they can hurt you if they want."This one appears tame, Smith said, but could be dangerous because wild animals are unpredictable. People should not approach it, nor should they run away from the animal since that could provoke a chase. The best thing to do is ignore it, keep away from it and call the authorities, he said.
I don't know about you, but if
I see a cat the size of a large dog, I'm headed the other way. Quickly.
It can chase me if it wants. But I don't think it'll catch me.
It's like outrunning a dragon when you're walking with a hobbit. You don't have to beat the dragon -- you just have to run faster than the hobbit.
Posted by: mhking at
07:26 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 237 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'll admit it sure does look like a lynx -- except for the tail. Maybe it's the love child of a lynx and a
very sore housecat.
Posted by: McGehee at June 03, 2004 02:42 AM (lGoQn)
2
And I thought "roaches big as baby shoes" was bad. (So damn ghetto.)
Posted by: Beau at June 03, 2004 06:31 AM (GpmN8)
3
Ewww! You so nasty, Mc G.
Clean up your act.
Posted by: Beau at June 03, 2004 06:33 AM (GpmN8)
4
Hell...shoot it...burn it...gas it,this might be a terrorist,
God knows we try to destroy EVERYTHING we don't understand...WE FEAR!!!
Posted by: Gerry at June 03, 2004 09:48 AM (S1nA7)
5
There was a half-bobcat half-housecat that terrorized my neighborhood's pets growing up. It finally disappeared after an especially cold winter.
Posted by: Beck at June 03, 2004 12:56 PM (fllfQ)
6
What a beautiful animal!!
Just an observation, Beck, but a wild bobcat (size of Golden Retriever?) mating with a domestic house cat would be analogous to a Saint Bernard mating with a chihuahua. Think about it. McGehee already has!
Posted by: Indigo at June 03, 2004 01:43 PM (shQXa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Judge: Kobe Bryant's accuser cannot be referred to as "victim"
Colorado state District Judge Terry Ruckriegle
agreed with defense attorneys in the Kobe Bryant sexual abuse trial that using the term "victim" to describe the woman who has accused the LA Lakers' star of rape implies guilt on Kobe's part.
"Its use under these circumstances could improperly suggest that a crime had been committed such that the presumption of innocence might be jeopardized," Ruckriegle said. He said the 19-year-old woman must be referred to by name at trial and as a "person" in jury instructions.
This is going to get very interesting for a press who has broken their collective necks not to give the accuser's name or show her picture since this case broke last summer.
And a trial date still has not been set.
Posted by: mhking at
08:19 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 145 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm curious Mike, what are your thoughts on Kobe?
All hype?
Obviously no one should be judged, especially before a trial, but I have never been able to completely buy the "squeaky clean" image Kobe has maintained prior to this development.
I'd be interested in your opinion....thanks-
Posted by: Tman at June 02, 2004 09:25 AM (Fho+X)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Judge rules against partial-birth abortion due to "undue burden"
U.S. District Court Judge Phyllis Hamilton in San Francisco,
has struck down the partial-birth abortion law on the grounds that it is unconstitutional. How, you might ask? Because it is vague and creates an "undue burden" on abortion rights.
Hamilton sided with Planned Parenthood in its suit against the federal government, in relation to the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. The act was signed into law by President Bush late last year, and bans the controversial method of late-term abortion.
Pro-choice defenders claim that the measure is an overall assault on abortion rights in this nation.
The National Abortion Federation, the Center for Reproductive Rights, and the American Civil Liberties Union praised Hamilton's ruling, saying they were "pleased that the court in San Francisco recognized that this ban is a broad attack on abortion beginning as early as 13 weeks in pregnancy."Dr. LeRoy Carhart, the lead plaintiff in the Nebraska challenge to the federal law, said, "The court in San Francisco recognized this federal ban for what it is: a threat to women's health. The court understood that the government has no business trying to come between doctors and their patients and telling doctors that they can't put their patients' health and safety first."
I usually stay away from the abortion issue in and of itself; my personal feeling is that those who neglect to understand the social and religious ramifications of the procedure will come to know the gravity of their decisions when they have to answer to the Almighty for what they have done, rightly or wrongly. It's not my place to judge.
On the other hand, Judge Hamilton, in her reasoning, makes me question her judgement. The US District Court in San Francisco seems to come up with plenty of decisions that cite "feelings" and "emotions" as opposed to logic and reasoning.
Is this how judges are supposed to work?
Posted by: mhking at
06:55 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 332 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Is this how judges are supposed to work?
In San Francisco?
Posted by: McGehee at June 02, 2004 07:25 AM (lGoQn)
2
Was this the ninth circus court by any chance? If so, they are noted as being the leader of the pack in being activist judges.
Posted by: Guy S. at June 02, 2004 07:56 AM (f6cjG)
3
Nope. Federal district judge in a federal district court. It goes to the circus on appeal, though.
Posted by: McGehee at June 02, 2004 12:11 PM (lGoQn)
4
Thanks, I sit corrected *grin*.
Posted by: Guy S. at June 02, 2004 09:07 PM (f6cjG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
95kb generated in CPU 0.0395, elapsed 0.483 seconds.
57 queries taking 0.4597 seconds, 213 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.