January 23, 2005
Boxer: "I'll call Rice a liar again."
US Senator Barbara Boxer (
Stark Raving & Drooling Lunatic Moonbat-CA)
said today that she would repeat charges that Secretary of State-designee Condoleezza Rice deliberately lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
"I will lay out again on the Senate floor [why] I do not believe [she] has been candid with the American people," Sen. Boxer told CNN's "Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer.""[She's] gone on shows like yours and made statements that I don't think were true, or they were half-true, didn't tell the whole story, didn't level with the American people."
Reacting to criticism from White House chief of staff Andy Card, who called her attacks on Rice last week "petty politics," the Marin County Democrat taunted, "Even though Andy Card would like me to go away, I'm not going to go away."
"[Rice] said things that were flat-out not true," Sen. Boxer continued. "When she said only one agency thought the aluminum tubes could not be used for nuclear weapons, that wasn't true."
Boxer's ravings were shown as lies and half-truths by posters across the blogosphere (
including me) last week.
Boxer has some sort of personal grudge; in the eyes of some, she figures she's less vulnerable than most liberals, since she was just reelected to a six-year term by her constituents in California.
Posted by: mhking at
05:35 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 227 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Rachel Lucas said it best (from memory): "I was just waiting for Condi to answer Boxer's questions, with the real answer, followed by
'Got it? Bitch?'"
Posted by: Tuning Spork at January 23, 2005 05:45 PM (L9A/j)
2
Barbara Boxer is a idiot! She wouldn't know the truth if it hit her in the face.
Posted by: Getting My Mind Right at January 23, 2005 07:31 PM (xOuqd)
3
I watched the first round of confirmation hearings, and Boxer just struck me as frickin' stupid. She was nowhere near Condi Rice's level. It was sort of like a 5 year old ranting at their parents.
I was, however, very impressed with Obama's questioning.
Keep up the great work mate!
Posted by: random prose at January 23, 2005 09:04 PM (tvFRc)
4
We in the blogospere need to keep the spotlight on Babs and remind everyone what a pernicious bitch she is. You, sir, are doing a great job of that! Keep it up.
Posted by: BobG at January 24, 2005 03:49 AM (DVC1F)
5
It's all a part of the political game. I don't see why people are upset when it means nothing.
Democrats have already said she will be confirmed.
Posted by: DarkStar at January 24, 2005 03:20 PM (cnw1A)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Goodnight, Johnny.
Johnny Carson
1925-2005
We missed you long before you were gone...
(More coverage from
Wizbang,
LaShawn Barber,
Pajama Hadin,
Short Family Online,
LGF,
Free Republic,
DC Thornton,
Argghhh!,
Diggers' Realm,
Rooftop Report,
Barking Moonbat, and lots of others, including most of my blogroll)
Posted by: mhking at
09:01 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
1
RIP Johnny. The Tonight Show was actually funny when he was on the air.
Posted by: kimberley at January 23, 2005 09:28 AM (+7VNs)
2
I grew up watching Johnny. It was a right of passage of sorts when you were able to stay up to see him anytime you wanted. He has been missed for sometime now...but there was always that thought in the back of your head...wondering if he would come back just one more time (if only to guest host). Hear the new gig he has now, has one stellar guest list.
Posted by: Guy S. at January 23, 2005 12:54 PM (JHj4Q)
3
Johnny was the best by a wide margin.
Posted by: BobG at January 23, 2005 01:10 PM (4cWxS)
4
Johnny Carson
Nearly five thousand times
He came out upon that stage
And in entertainment’s history
He wrote a very unique page.
He also "made" many a star
And launched some great careers
And everyone who was someone
Was his guest throughout those years.
Some twenty thousand people
Sat across him in the "chair"
He made them all feel welcome
And he really seemed to care.
He had his own brand of humor
Making funny, what was not
An honest, too good Entertainer
And what you saw is what you got.
Millions of us stayed up late
To see what he had up his sleeve
And now, that show is "really" over
And we are all left here to grieve.
And those who didn’t "know" him
Before he left that stage in Ninety-two
Will never know how much they missed
Now that his time on Earth is through.
But there will be a "Tonight Show"
Forever, somewhere up on high
As Johnny welcomes all those Stars
Who have passed this World by.
Del "Abe" Jones
White Bluff, TN
January 23, 2005
Posted by: Charles D. Jones at January 25, 2005 10:39 AM (JXz8g)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 21, 2005
"ALLAH FUBAR!!!"
Wizbang and
Rooftop Report have been all over this VW "commercial" since word of it surfaced.
The ad, a hoax viral ad not unlike last year's Ford Ka web ads that depicted a cat being beheaded and a pigeon being smacked into the street, is making it's way across the internet. The spot shows a man stepping out of a house in a nameless cosmopolitan European city and getting into a black VW Polo (a European-only sedan, similar to the American VW Golf).
After driving the Polo through the city, he stops in front of a sidewalk cafe packed with diners. Inside the car, you see that he is a suicide bomber with a bomb vest on and a detonator in his hand.
Outside the car again, the bomb detonates, and is completely contained within the car. A muffled "whumpf" sounds as the car remains intact. One diner looks up at the car casually.
The captioned tag reads, "Polo. Small but tough."
The ad plays on the established tagline for Volkswagen's Polo model, "small but tough". It shows a man in fatigues setting off in his Polo. He arrives outside a restaurant and pulls out a trigger. However, when he detonates the bomb, a flash is seen inside the car but the car itself does not explode. The strapline appears at the end. The campaign is the work of a duo known for their spoof advertising, called Lee and Dan. The pair run a website, LeeandDan.com, but the ad does not appear on the site at the time of writing. They have worked on a string of legitimate ads including Ford StreetKa, BP and Casio G-Shock, among others. Dan, from Lee and Dan, said: "The ad got out accidentally and has spread like wildfire. It wasn't meant for public consumption. "We think the spot reflects what people see in the news everyday, and in this instance the car is the hero that protects innocent people from someone with very bad intentions. We're sorry if the ad has caused any offence." Volkswagen stressed that the spot, which has been doing the viral email rounds this week, was made without any involvement from the company whatsoever. DDB London was also not involved in the spot.
It might be in bad taste, but as far as I'm concerned, it's certainly funny as hell!
Oh. And you can watch the ad here, or watch it here.
Posted by: mhking at
04:16 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 405 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Agreed. I hate to say it, but it is pretty stinking funny. Good call.
Posted by: Steve at January 21, 2005 05:31 PM (qUGze)
2
Funny, the first time I saw it I almost choked, I was laughing so hard. Those two have no apologies to make, they only have to make more.
Posted by: Mike H. at January 21, 2005 10:07 PM (FCfM4)
Posted by: DarkStar at January 22, 2005 06:46 AM (cnw1A)
4
Oh dear. I have to share this one with half the free world now ...
Posted by: Kate at January 23, 2005 12:21 AM (EwaGN)
5
Yer right. Very bad taste. But, *chortle* *snort*
BWAHAHAHAHAAA!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at January 23, 2005 05:35 PM (L9A/j)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Terrorists behead Iraqi policeman in broad daylight
The bad guys are getting bolder and bolder with their attacks.
According to a Kuwait News Agency (KUNA) report today, they decapitated an Iraqi policeman in front of shocked onlookers on a Baghdad street today.
Witnesses said here Friday that a number of gunmen beheaded a policeman and stuck a note on his corpse describing as traitors those working with or helping the police.About ten gunmen in two cars in the Ramadi area stepped out of their vehicles, attacked a soldier, tied his hands behind his back, and cut his head off before the eyes of shocked onlookers in the street, the witnesses said.
Do these animals have no shame?
And we're stuck with moonbats here worrying about the terrorists and how they are treated.
Just damn.
Posted by: mhking at
08:45 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 140 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Absolutely insane. How can murder be induced in people so easily? Exactly what does it take to convince a group of people that beheading somebody in public is honorable? Sick sick sick.
Posted by: Steve at January 21, 2005 05:39 PM (qUGze)
2
Let's get one thing strait...I think both the left and the right can agree that these beheadings and terrorist attacks are terrible things, and that those who do them are terrible people.
That being said, it's not fair to say that "we're stuck with moonbats here worrying about the terrorists and how they are treated."
I'm assuming you're speaking about liberals, specifically Democrats...well I think that they should be treated reasonably. We don't have the right to abuse and torture them, and they don't have the right to do it to us. And the people in Guantanamo Bay aren't even terrorists necessarily...they're suspected terrorists or supporters of them. The problem comes in when we hold them indefinitely without pressing charges. If we find that they are guilty we can punish them, but we can't just keep them locked up without giving them a chance to prove their innocence.
This public beheading is a tragedy, as were the ones before it, but do not think that just because liberals want rights for the detained that we condone what these obvious murderers are doing.
Posted by: nextbigthing at January 22, 2005 05:37 PM (e9ktT)
3
This is not only a war on terror, it is a war on Islamic fundamentalists who hate America, Western culture, and for that matter, the entire Western World. They declared this war, and they drew first blood. It is indeed a "Jihad" and the U.S. history goes back to 1979 when the Shah was deposed in Iran.
Get it straight - The Swedish Chef and his kitchen staff didn't crash planes into the WTC, Muslims did, and it down't matter what country they were from. It is radical Islam that we're fighting.
Here's the bottom line. Every time someone whines about the fate of the Guantanamo detainees, enemy resolve is boosted. Every time a liberal politician slams Bush, the enemy loves it.
They are irrational and deluded. They continue to fight because they erroneoulsy believe that the majority of Americans understand and support their cause.
The Guantanamo detainees would just as soon tie YOUR hands behind your back and cut your head off with a dull knife. Believe it.
Posted by: Groundskeeper at January 27, 2005 02:07 AM (VAjGE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Is his name Bond...James Bond?
Is this face of the new James Bond?
According to insiders, it is.
6'6" Scottish actor Rory McCann is the unknown that is reportedly the top choice of producers of the as-yet-untitled 21st James Bond flick, set to be filmed later this year or early next year.
McCann may be known peripherally to American audiences for a part in Oliver Stone's much-panned Alexander this year, and for a role known to PBS/BBC America viewers of Monarch of the Glen. McCann has recently finished filming in Beowulf and Grendel, due to be released stateside later this year.
The previous Bond, Pierce Brosnan, was let go by EON Productions late last year, when they indicated they wanted to go in a "new direction" with the Bond character. The Hollywood Reporter has all but confirmed that Goldeneye director Martin Campbell will direct "Bond 21" as well.
Posted by: mhking at
07:14 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 153 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Guy S. at January 21, 2005 01:18 PM (/0bzw)
2
Hugh firms to be next 007
23jan05
AUSTRALIAN Hugh Jackman is favourite to become movie world's next James Bond.
British bookmakers Ladbrokes and William Hill have cut their odds to 2/1 on the likelihood of Jackman taking over from Pierce Brosnan.
It would make Jackman the second Australian after George Lazenby to play secret agent 007.
Clive Owen has had his odds cut by both bookmakers after his Golden Globe-winning role in the film Closer.
William Hill has him in third place -- behind Star Wars' Ewan McGregor -- after Sunday's awards at 4/1, down from 8/1. Ladbrokes has cut his odds from 14/1 to 8/1 after the win for best supporting actor.
Earlier favourites included Colin Farrell, Colin Salmon, Dougray Scott and Eric Bana.
http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,12018519%255E2902,00.html
Posted by: Patrick at January 22, 2005 04:52 AM (eoWr9)
3
As long as it's NOT Hugh Jackman or that cow eyed English actor, Rupert somebody. This guy actually looks a little like the real Bond, Sean Connery. Now if they can just get a decent script, get the right woman to play Moneypenny, find a good looking Bond girl, toughen up M and get the rights to Casino Royale we'll be good to go.
Posted by: kimberley at January 23, 2005 09:32 AM (+7VNs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 20, 2005
Hail to the chief!
Newly sworn in, Bush offered an implied rebuttal to critics of his foreign policy and the war in Iraq. "Some, I know, have questioned the global appeal of liberty," (President Bush) said, "though this time in history, four decades defined by the swiftest advance of freedom ever seen, is an odd time for doubt.""We go forward with complete confidence in the eventual triumph of freedom," he said in remarks that were shorn of all but the most glancing references to the dominant political issues of the day.
The spread of freedom and liberty were the oldest ideals of America, Bush said. "Now it is the urgent requirement of our nation's security, and the calling of our time."
President Bush was
sworn into his second term at noontime today on the front steps of the Capitol. Ailing Supreme Court Chief Justice Williiam Rehnquist delivered the oath of office on a cold Washington day that left no doubt that the Republicans were in charge.
The US Senate, in an afternoon session, will take up cabinet appointments. Though Democratic Senator Robert Byrd (KKK-WV) suggested late yesterday that he would stall a vote on Bush' s choice for Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, until sometime next week -- a blatantly transparent swipe at the President, designed to let the Administration know that Senate Democrats are still engaging in open warfare with the White House.
Posted by: mhking at
08:22 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 258 words, total size 2 kb.
January 19, 2005
Boxer gets caught in her own lie
Senator Barbara Boxer (Raving Moonbat-CA), in her zeal to try to attack Secretary of State-designee Condoleezza Rice during confirmation hearings on Capitol Hill yesterday,
falsely insisted that WMD was the only thing that Congress voted on when authorizing military action in Iraq.
BOXER: Well, you should read what we voted on when we voted to support the war, which I did not, but most of my colleagues did. It was WMD, period. That was the reason and the causation for that, you know, particular vote.
Boxer has been so enamored by the notion of attacking the Administration that she obviously didn't do her homework before spouting her lies.
Boxer failed to note that seven different points were included in the authorization, contrary to her insistance otherwise.
To coin a phrase, let's go to the videotape!
1. Iraq's harboring of Al-Queda terrorists
2. Iraq's support for International Terrorism
3. Iraq's "brutal repression" of its citizens
4. Iraq's failure to repatriate or give information on non-Iraqi citizens detained and captured during Gulf War I, including an American serviceman;
5. Failing to properly return property wrongfully seized during the Kuwait invasion
6. The attempted assassination of former President Bush in 1993
7. America's national security interests in restoring peace and stability to the Persian Gulf
Mind you, this does not include the enforcement of the United Nations resolutions (that everyone from the Left to the UN itself seems to so conveniently forget in their ongoing endeavor to attack this President and this Administration).
In other words, Boxer either had a lapse of memory or she just plain lied.
But then again, as I've said before, a lie told enough times becomes the truth in the minds of those who are apt to believe it. And Boxer has shown that the left plans to continue to tell as many lies about this President and this Administration as possible in order to make him look as bad as possible, and enhance their own standing.
Posted by: mhking at
04:47 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 354 words, total size 3 kb.
1
If you count up the 'WHEREAS' clauses in the authorization resolution, congress itself gave TWENTY-THREE different reasons for going to war.
The Democrats really blew it this time: saying that there was only one reason for war, and that Condi's refusal to concede the point demonstrates her loose relationship with the truth, is not only provably wrong but also demonstrates that Senator Boxer is the one with the loose relationship with the truth.
Posted by: Ursus at January 19, 2005 08:18 AM (Ejs7a)
2
I don't say this lightly, but I think that she has to be the DUMBEST senator that I have seen in my entire life!
Posted by: Steven J. Kelso Sr. at January 19, 2005 03:11 PM (U4SDZ)
3
What's up with Democrats "talk" to have THE Black votes," so, why do Ranking Dems severely pick on EVERY minority person President Bush nominate? Recall:black female Judge nominee,the Hispanic and now Rice. ALL my black friends voted BUSH!
Posted by: Jeanne Wimbley at January 20, 2005 06:06 PM (xIQKr)
4
Actually,
3.Iraq's "brutal repression" of its citizens is covered by U.N. SC Res 688.
Posted by: Neo at January 21, 2005 10:55 AM (FWm03)
5
Well, it's obvious that the Bush administration emphasized the existence of WMDs. The support to go to war would have been considerable decreased if Bush hadn't lied and said that they had proof of weapons of mass destruction. They also distorted the truth in other ways, including the tubes that were "only suitable for making nuclear weapons" and the "traveling chemical labs"...oh, the tubes were only potential shells for regular missiles, and the "labs" were for creating hydrogen for weather balloons...
of course, they had this information...the CIA gave them documents offering both an assenting and dissenting opinion as to what these things could be, but the administration chose to downplay the dissenters in order to make their plans justified and a "threat" seem imminent...
please do not presume to call progressive senators dumb and liars when our conservative president obviously distorts the truth and even has trouble giving simple speeches without making up words or using improper grammar...
Posted by: nextbigthing at January 21, 2005 06:45 PM (aKFHi)
6
The Bush administration used the available information at that time like you stated
""""of course, they had this information...the CIA gave them documents offering both an assenting and dissenting opinion as to what these things could be, but the administration chose to downplay the dissenters in order to make their plans justified and a "threat" seem imminent...""""
plus the testimonies from various sources and testimonies including people such as Bill Clinton, Kerry Dog face, and whole bunch of liberals from previous administration, after all, Bush was in office for only about a year. You idiots liberals convinienntly forgot about the facts. THe CIA was also led by the people from previous administartion. So I could conclude that the Bush admin was misled by the Clinton's people.
***Now go and check on all the facts and fuck youself or your dog after all your a whining bitch.***
Posted by: fuckUnextbigthingbitch at January 21, 2005 11:19 PM (02elr)
7
You are obviously too dense to see my point. The point is that the administration had two different options. They could either acknowledge that there was the possiblity that there weren't any weapons and that they didn't have "irrefutable evidence" that there were WMDs, or they could lie and say that there were weapons and they had absolute proof and it couldn't be anything else. Well, obviously they chose the latter.
And we didn't actually go to war in Iraq until 2003...Bush had been in office for more than a year...wait, let me help you out with this one....Bush was elected in the 2000 election, took office in 2001...we went to war in 2003...
watch this, it's like magic...
2003-2001=2 years
That's right...did you see what I did there? It's called subtraction...
And one more thing...I would go fuck my dog, but your mom's busy tonight...give her my best though...
Posted by: nextbigthing at January 22, 2005 05:29 PM (e9ktT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 18, 2005
Rice politely tells Senate Dems to shove it
Secretary of State-designee Condoleezza Rice, testifying in today's confirmation hearings before a Senate subcommittee,
got testy with several Democrats who seemed intent on attacking her character.
California Democrat Sen. Barbara Boxer argued that the Bush administration had shifted its justification for the war because it had failed to find stocks of biological and chemical weapons it had asserted were there."You sent them in there because of weapons of mass destruction. Later the mission changed when there were none," Boxer told Rice. "Let's not rewrite history, it's too soon to do that."
"It wasn't just weapons of mass destruction," Rice told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, saying former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein supported terrorism, attacked Kuwait and Israel and needed to be removed given the new U.S. threat perception after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington.
"We can have this discussion in any way that you would like, but I really hope that you will refrain from impugning my integrity," Rice told Boxer. "I really hope that you will not imply that I take the truth lightly."
Boxer wasn't the only moonbat to go after Rice during today's testimony, as Delaware Democrat Joe Biden and former presidential candidate John Kerry (Moonbat-MA) took their shots.
"We must use American diplomacy to help create a balance of power in the world that favors freedom," Rice told the committee. "And the time for diplomacy is now."Biden shot back: "Despite our great military might we are in my view more alone in the world than we've been in any time in recent memory. The time for diplomacy, in my view, is long overdue."
"We went in to rescue Iraq from Saddam Hussein, now I think we have to rescue our policy from ourselves," added Sen. John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who failed to unseat Bush. "I don't take any joy in this but it's ... the reality we've got to deal with. We've got kids dying over there."
It sounds like Ketchup Boy is still sore over losing the election, and wants to take it out on whomever he can. Mind you, he's still spouting his untruths about disenfranchised voters in Ohio and playing the martyred sore loser.
Though Rice's confirmation is all but assured, Senate Democrats have tossed veiled threats at the Republican leadership regarding White House nominees over the past few weeks, most notably over the possibility of the nomination of conservative Supreme Court jurist Clarence Thomas to the Chief Justice position on the retirement of ailing current Chief Justice William Rehnquist.
Provided the GOP leadership on the Hill gets some backbone about themselves, this won't be the headache that it currently looks to be shaping up as.
Posted by: mhking at
10:55 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 466 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Ultimately, the Senate has to get rid of the arcane, unconstitutional, undemocratic filibuster.
Only in the US Senate can a determined minority thwart the will of the majority, not as a shield in protection of the minority's rights, but rather as a sword. It's wrong; it should go.
Posted by: Tony Iovino at January 19, 2005 04:17 AM (PSRRr)
2
We usually have a better system than the Mexican Revolution times; however, just IMAGINE a brick wall, a firing squad and Demon after Demon receiving the justice they want sane and decent people in Iraq, Iran, Darfur and North Korea to receive.
Makes you think of Boxer, Murray, Biden, Fatty Teddy and other Michael Morons doesn't it?
Posted by: leaddog2 at January 19, 2005 07:14 AM (WH270)
3
I heard more than I could take. Boxer was mean and vicious, Biden was condescending, and Kerry smiled while being rude. They lost the presidential election plus House and Senate. She(Dr. Rice) acted unset and sometimes looked it, while being attacked by Biden, Kerry, and Boxer. Boxer said she lied without using the word! Robert Byrd talked for 14 hours forty years ago to stop civil rights legislation and lost, according to a computer search! Every person put forth will be attacked including judges and other cabinet members. A vacant Supreme Court space will probably come up this year even though I hope recovery by the Chief Justice. Thomas was derided by Reed. A male conservative is bad, but a black female conservative is worst.
James M. Barber
Posted by: James M. Barber at January 22, 2005 02:55 PM (9qhgG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Cobb school board appeals evolution sticker decision
In a 5-2 vote last night, the Cobb County School Board
voted to appeal the decision of US District Judge Clarence Cooper, which would force the removal of a controversial sticker from science books in the county.
Cooper's decision insists the sticker, which reads "This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered," violates the "Establishment Clause" of the US Constitution, which maintains the so-called separation of church and state.
On the heels of the school board vote, the board issued a statement which indicated that they felt "condemned . . . for taking a reasonable approach to address the concerns of citizens on a controversial issue."
The disclaimers stem from a petition drive begun in 2002 by Marjorie Rogers, who described herself during testimony in November as a creationist who believes the Bible's book of Genesis is factual. Rogers collected 2,300 signatures from supporters, prompting the board to print the disclaimers on stickers and place them in 13 science books used in middle and high schools.Six parents sued to remove the stickers saying the disclaimers violated the principle of separation between church and state. Cooper heard three days of testimony, plus closing arguments, in November. He issued his ruling Thursday.
The board's decision Monday flabbergasted Jeffrey Selman, the leader of the parents who sued. "They're ludicrous," he said. "They're ignoring the ruling."
Board Chairwoman Kathie Johnstone read the board's statement aloud Monday, although both she and Laura Searcy voted against the appeal. Johnstone, the only one of seven members not on the board when the disclaimers were written, said she personally felt "it's time to move on."
"I'm worried about the toll it will have on the district," she said.
Board members said they would pursue the appeal at no additional cost, a promise stemming from board attorney Glenn Brock's pledge to do his remaining work on the case for free. Brock's law firm has charged the board roughly $74,000 so far.
Brock said he would request a stay either today or tomrrow on the judge's decision, pending the appeal.
My major beef with the issue has been addressed already, and that's the additional expenditure that we as Cobb County taxpayers would be saddled with, thanks to this entire process. Brock's firm won't be adding to the tax burdon with the appeal -- based on that, my feeling is that the appeal should move forward. There is no logical reason that the Judge Cooper should intervein in this matter - the stickers do not endorse any one theory of creation over another; it only suggests that the generally accepted theory is not the only one.
Or are the parents who filed the suit so afraid of a challenge to their own theories that they feel a zeal toward defending their theory? An almost religious zeal, perhaps?
Posted by: mhking at
10:17 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 504 words, total size 3 kb.
This is wrong on at least six levels -- even for Bill Gates
Bill Gates, sporting his "come hither" look, and looking more like a child molester, showed up in a 1985
Teen Beat spread.
I wonder if the future Mrs. Gates had a copy...
Posted by: mhking at
08:22 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I wonder if the future Mrs. Gates had a copy...
What do you think sealed the deal?
Those puppy dog eyes & the way he tosses those 5 1/4 floppies.
Posted by: BH at January 18, 2005 10:46 AM (Ki9Ww)
2
Now THAT'S some funny stuff....
By the way, Michael....My son did have his surgery finally and he's doing well....
You can even see pics
HERE
Thank you once again for your prayers and well-wishes....
Posted by: CrzyDJM at January 19, 2005 01:16 AM (GSdIn)
3
Bill: "Come on, let's do it on my desk while I write binary all over your body in chocolate then spank you with my manual as you caress my hard drive."
I am scared of those pics, wtf was he thinking, spread out on that desk, like he was some center fold for Nerdgirl Magazine, with that come hither stare, inviting all chicks to touch his floppy.
Teen Beat, hahahaha!!
Posted by: Staci at January 19, 2005 03:35 AM (oKKoQ)
4
Heh. I remember those floppy disks. MicroSoft donated thousands of extra blanks to my High School and I ended up with hundreds of them.
Also, look at the curves on the monitor. Amazing how things used to look.
Posted by: King of Fools at January 19, 2005 06:54 AM (ktIW6)
5
That is too funny for words!
Posted by: Brainster at January 19, 2005 12:46 PM (CxBVU)
6
Another good thing about floppies...
Remember when AOL was small enough to fit on a floppy? I used to love getting those disks in the mail 'cause it was a free disk, basically...You formatted it and then you had an extra disk...
Now if they'd only start sending out AOL on CD-RW's instead of CD-ROM's....
Posted by: CrzyDJM at January 21, 2005 01:19 AM (GSdIn)
7
That's very, very...disturbing. Ugh. I bet it took hours to sanitize that desk.
Posted by: Steve at January 21, 2005 05:36 PM (qUGze)
8
On the other hand these pictures probably did much good. I'm sure that after looking at them many of Tiger Beat's readers decided on virginity at least until graduation.
Posted by: kimberley at January 23, 2005 09:34 AM (+7VNs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Liberals love helping folks -- Yeah. Right.
Liberal feel-gooders love helping folks -- and this is not to say the tsunami victims don't need help. But do you hear a one of them - black or white - say anything about the genocide victims in the Sudan?
And you sure don't hear Jesse and the Soul Patrol saying anything...
Posted by: mhking at
07:07 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Jackson is paid off I think.
The CBC raised it during Clinton's last year in office. They raised it again 2 or 3 years of Bush's term.
The U.S. declaring it genocide and then doing nothing isn't a good thing.
Rawanda, Take II.
Posted by: DarkStar at January 18, 2005 02:30 PM (cnw1A)
2
Do you hear conservatives saying any more?
Posted by: Andrew at January 19, 2005 03:08 PM (QwgOt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 17, 2005
100 pound girl downs 11 pounds of burger 'n fixin's at one sitting!
I'm a big man, and I'm in a constant struggle to lose weight these days.
But this waif of a girl, at a hundred pounds, soaking wet, won the challenge at Denny's Beer Barrel Pub in State College, PA, and didn't look any worse for wear afterward!
19 year-old Kate Stelnick, a Princeton student downed a six-pound burger plus fixins -- bun and all -- in just under three hours last Wednesday.
Denny Leigey Jr., the owner of the bar 35 miles northwest of State College, had offered a two-pound burger for years and conceived of the six-pounder after his daughter went to college and phoned him about a bar that sold a four-pounder.But nobody had finished the big burger in the three-hour time limit since it was introduced on Super Bowl Sunday 1998. In addition to the meat, contestants much eat one large onion, two whole tomatoes, one half head of lettuce, 1 1/4 pounds of cheese, two buns, and a cup each of mayonnaise, ketchup, mustard, relish, banana peppers and some pickles.
I feel sick just looking at this. A rice cake and a glass of water doesn't sound so bad any more.
Posted by: mhking at
11:07 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 221 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Maybe I should forward her some of these online pharmacy ads I've been getting... she might could use a few anti-cholesterol drugs.
Posted by: Woody at January 17, 2005 09:57 PM (lrY6O)
2
It's wrong to wish a heart attack on someone. I recognize that, really I do...
Posted by: Gib at January 18, 2005 04:14 AM (PsC2M)
3
Alka Seltzer! Alka Seltzer!
Posted by: Fausta at January 18, 2005 04:27 AM (LtiJz)
4
I have a growing problem highlighting the gastronomic excess by showing such contests.
To this day, if my mother sees me eating something walking down the street, she admonishes me that it's not polite.
She comes from the day when people really having no food to eat was not uncommon.
Posted by: DarkStar at January 18, 2005 08:54 AM (cnw1A)
5
And I heard she also won the puke-and-choke competition that followed. First prize was a big bowl of green pea soup.
Posted by: James C. Hess at January 19, 2005 02:44 AM (PbWd+)
6
Honestly, that's my kind of woman!
Posted by: Steve at January 21, 2005 05:35 PM (qUGze)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Idiot reporter makes MLK slur, gets fired
Las Vegas weather reporter Rob Blair was fired yesterday after making an
offensive slur against Martin Luther King, in what he termed an "accidental slip of the tongue" in an on-air apology broadcast later.
Jim Prather, vice president and general manager of KTNV, said Blair "stumbled" during a weather update at 7:55 a.m. Saturday but added that "this kind of incident is not acceptable under any circumstances, and I'm truly sorry that this event occurred."Blair was delivering the extended forecast when he said, "For tomorrow, 60 degrees, Martin Luther Coon King Jr. Day, gonna see some temperatures in the mid-60s."
About 20 minutes later, Blair told viewers at the ABC affiliate, "Apparently I accidentally said Martin Luther Kong Jr., which I apologize about -- slip of the tongue."
He offered a full apology during Saturday's 6 p.m. and 11 p.m. newscasts.
At 6:11 p.m., co-anchor Christina Brown, who is black, announced, "Right now we want to pause for a program note. Rob?"
Blair, seated at the news desk with co-anchors Brown and Shawn Boyd, said, "On a weather report earlier this morning, I made an accidental slip of the tongue when talking about the Martin Luther King holiday, and what I said was interpreted by many viewers as highly offensive. For that I offer my deepest apology. I in no way intended to offend anyone. I'm very sorry."
Moronic idiot.
Posted by: mhking at
09:47 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 253 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Good riddance,Blair. He got what he deserved.
Posted by: Jim at January 18, 2005 08:10 PM (jca3+)
2
LET EVERYONE REMEMBER HIS FACE, BECAUSE AMERICA IS BIG PLACE AND HE MAY CHANGE HIS NAME!
Posted by: CONCERNED at January 20, 2005 08:27 AM (qmWk5)
3
i've watched rob blair for over 3 years and i think rob is a great guy.i support rob in his apoligie for his mistake to all who think differnt thats your opinion.
Posted by: someone who cares at January 23, 2005 10:44 AM (+XNJ0)
4
I went to college with Rob. He's a nice guy, who made a mistake. I did not see the incident, but I believe folks should be given another chance...might be a good opportunity for some positive press or local interest stories...similar to community service as opposed to jail...
Posted by: justacomment at May 26, 2005 05:15 PM (3Jt3j)
5
I live in California, up in the north state in Glenn County. As a person of color I can honestly say that many places in the North State are HARDLY racially tolerant. Rob was a newscaster on NCN news in Redding or Red Bluff and he was clearly one of the "good ole boys" in the North State broadcast community. Eric McClendon was a sportscaster up here, but he is black--bet he wasn't a card carrying "ole boys" clubber. But clearly Rob Blair has heard a "nigger" joke or two....just laughs and back slapping between Rob and Buck. Trouble is racism cloaked under the best disguise will creep out at the WORST possible moment. Like during a newscast on Martin "Coon" King Day. Maybe since that day he has gotten good at saying "would you like fries with that!"
Posted by: Loren Roque at September 16, 2005 09:42 PM (TEr+r)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
National COGIC leader blames abortion for social security problems
National Church of God in Christ board member Bishop George McKinney said Social Security is in trouble today
because of abortion.
"Part of the problem that we're seeing now with Social Security has to do with the fact that 40 to 50 million people who have been killed through abortions have not taken their role as productive citizens."McKinney said the Democratic Party's support for legal abortion and gay marriage has cost it support in the black community.
Of course, this won't win him any friends among the Soul Patrol.
COGIC is the fourth largest denomination in the US with 5.5 million members.
Posted by: mhking at
09:35 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 121 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Do I hear an Amen for Bishop George McKinney? Because he has hit this right on the nosey.
Posted by: BCN at January 19, 2005 08:14 AM (GeNdf)
2
Wondering where the jobs for those 40-50 million would come from? Birth them and they will come?
Posted by: steve at January 20, 2005 03:52 PM (NIXnm)
3
well, if the population increases, consumption increases. consumption comes from production, so increased consumption leads to increased production, which leads to increased employment (aka, more jobs!!)
Posted by: Ren at April 04, 2005 10:06 AM (htokw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
King's dream of Christian service. How do you serve?
Martin Luther King's legacy is always the subject of much debate and deliberation at this time of year, when the national holiday to commemorate his birth takes place.
There are those who insist that it is not deserved, due to King's activities that some consider to be subversive; there are others who look at it as an excuse and means to denigrate and verbally attack those who do not agree with them politically or socially; and there are those who simply look at it as an excuse for a day off work on the heels of the Christmas/New Year holiday timeframe.
Then there are those who look on this as a day of service -- service to their home, to their community, to their way of life. Some participate by joining in commemorative services, some by reflective thought, some by serving their fellow man, and some - simply by partaking in the American Dream and going to work.
Contrary to the carpings of Jesse Jackson and others who pretend to know what Dr. King would be doing today, why not celebrate the man and his work? Why take the time, as Jackson did in a Jonesboro, GA pulpit yesterday, to attack the Bush Administration or anyone else who disagrees with you?
Dr. King worked so that I, and others, would have the opportunity to openly disagree with the status quo, and to disagree with each other. He worked so that voices wouldn't be silenced simply for being contrary to the larger whole.
I'd like to think that Dr. King would be proud of someone like myself, who takes the time to think and speak my own mind, and who encourages others to do the same.
Across town from me, at Atlanta's Turner Field, hundreds of volunteers work to put the finishing touches on a hot meal and to assemble resources for the city's homeless. The annual effort also provides access to showers and a haircut for those who would otherwise be forgotten. Volunteers with job service knowledge and skills to share, provide help where possible to those homeless, in order that they might be able to lift themselves up by their own bootstraps and remove themselves from the homeless population.
That is their service. They give voice and action to Dr. King's dream of Christian brotherhood, fellowship and mission to and for all. And though there are many who look past that portion of King's dream in favor of other, more "glory-seeking" goals, is it not better to serve yourself, your family and your fellow man? I would dare say it was better in Dr. King's eyes, and it certainly is far better in God's eyes.
Today, I sit in my office, at work. I work to better my company, to better myself and to better my family. I give voice to that work, and am proud to do so. That is how I serve. I am certain Dr. King would applaud my service.
And you? How do you serve?
Posted by: mhking at
04:40 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 518 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Well said, sir, well said.
Posted by: BobG at January 17, 2005 05:08 AM (aw0SG)
2
I'm like you... today is another work day. I'll admit that it's kind of nice to flog the word processor without the phone ringing constantly. Maybe I can get ahead a little bit. For that, I'm thankful. And maybe I'll go out and watch the parade when it goes by the office.
Bob
Posted by: Bob Baird at January 17, 2005 05:58 AM (Wm3j/)
3
The title "Dr." King is a bit of a misnomer as he plagiarized his doctoral thesis, along with much of his scholarly and civil rights work.
Posted by: Joshua Claybourn at January 17, 2005 07:30 AM (YVbjA)
4
My first knowledge of Martin Luther KIng was when he was asassinated. I was five years old and I thought our King had died!
Of course, I learned later that what I remembered was MLK's departure from this old world.
It was in January or April of '83 that I heard a non-stop presentation of his speeches on a local college radio station. It was his near-
embodiment of honey rather than vinegar that made me a huge fan right then. He knew, and I learned, that people will listen if they don't feel like they're being assaulted -- even if they know they're wrong.
MLK did more for civil rights in a few short years than Jesse Jackson can ever do in all of his decades. Jackson can wail like a preacher with the best of 'em, but his rhetoric often rings shallow, not universal.
Martin Luther King forgot more than Jesse Jackson will ever know about how to inspire us to our best possible future.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at January 17, 2005 06:31 PM (5j1+/)
5
Lies. MLK would be resisting Bush most certainly. Any who claim he would bless Bush's butchery are delusional or liars.
Posted by: VP Admin at January 22, 2005 12:19 PM (G6s5F)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 13, 2005
Pentagon considered "aphrodisiac" and other chemical weapons
In the early-to-mid 90s, the Pentagon considered deploying a number of non-lethal chemical weapons,
according to newly-declassified documents.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an "aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour among troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale, the proposal says.Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable. Another was to develop a chemical that caused "severe and lasting halitosis", making it easy to identify guerrillas trying to blend in with civilians. There was also the idea of making troops' skin unbearably sensitive to sunlight.
What you bet Amnesty International and other groups who go out of their way to hate the US would have vilified us even further for something like this?
Posted by: mhking at
06:21 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 159 words, total size 1 kb.
1
They really don't need a new reason, do they?
Posted by: david at January 14, 2005 01:08 AM (Vv/3u)
2
That's hilarious! These all sound like Monty Python skits.
Posted by: oddbrian at January 14, 2005 04:45 AM (xH7dl)
3
This is the sort of stuff that happens when you pay people to just brainstorm, and write down and consider everything they say at least somewhat seriously.
I mean, look at what we're studying in all seriousness. Using sound as a weapon. Shooting down artillery shells with lasers.
I'm sure that we have invasion plans for Canada and mexico in some filing cabinet in the pentagon.
PsyOps does all sorts of wierd stuff. Some of it works, some of it doesn't. Alot of it is one-shot.
Posted by: Firethorn at January 14, 2005 07:47 AM (BPXQB)
4
What -- you mean the Canadian invasion plan
isn't serious!?
Dammit.
Posted by: McGehee at January 16, 2005 05:36 AM (S504z)
5
I didn't say that the planned invasion of Canada wasn't serious. I'm sure that the group that planned it was very serious. Though I bet it's on the low probability list.
Posted by: Firethorn at January 16, 2005 09:42 PM (BPXQB)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Kennedy: "Osama Obama"
Ted Kennedy
flubbed Osama Bin Laden's name in an interview this week, substituting freshman Senator Barak Obama's name instead.
"Osama bin Â… Osama Â… Obama."
Perhaps Jabba The Drunk needs to back off of the sauce for a little while.
Posted by: mhking at
10:42 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It's hard to tell when Ted's either drunk or sober nowadays.
Posted by: D.C. Thornton at January 13, 2005 11:27 AM (TpiAD)
2
He's one of my dead pool picks. Drink up, Teddy!
Posted by: david at January 14, 2005 01:09 AM (Vv/3u)
3
And Osama had better shut his fat, stinkin, liberal pie hole...........and don't complain about how his Massa Kennedy couldn't spit out his given name. Osama Obama.
Don't be late (again) for the 2005 Senate dinner on the Kennedy compound, either........BOY!! This ain't colored people's time.
Posted by: Beau at January 14, 2005 03:19 AM (GpmN8)
4
That's priceless. A Parody writer couldn't have scripted it any better.
Posted by: PajamaHadin at January 20, 2005 11:10 AM (DxLwq)
5
I don't think he's drunk. I think he's senile.
Posted by: Marc Shefelton at March 02, 2005 02:39 AM (zUYYz)
6
Do you want to buy best low price fahion coach handbags, we are a <a href=http://www.cheapcoachbagsshop.com]cheap coach bags</a> outlet online store, you can buy all coach products at lowst wholesale price and get free shipping.
Posted by: cheap bags shop at December 30, 2012 08:41 PM (hqjUs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
How nerdy am I? Nerdy enough.
Figures...
How 'bout you? How nerdy are you?
Posted by: mhking at
09:45 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I got an 85. Slightly nerdier than you, but I prefer the term geek to nerd. Geeks have friends, even if they're other geeks (as my friends are). Nerds don't have friends.
Posted by: david at January 14, 2005 01:31 AM (Vv/3u)
2
I'm a black dude from Georgia that scored a 97 on a nerd quiz. How depressing?
I agree, I prefer the title "geek" over "nerd." Nerds act nerdy because they don't know better; geeks act that way because they choose to.
Posted by: The General at January 14, 2005 06:27 AM (3OzU5)
3
I scored a humiliating 65.
Am I even allowed to
associate with the real nerds?
Posted by: Kate at January 14, 2005 07:53 PM (EwaGN)
4
Low rank nerd? When I never see my family because I'm in the back room blogging etc?
Call in CBS! Lets have an investigation - the quiz must be "accurate but fake"!
Hurumph!
Posted by: dave t at January 15, 2005 08:56 AM (UL+AK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Federal judge rules Cobb schools' "evolution disclaimer" stickers unconstitutional
My children attend schools in Cobb County, GA (makes sense, since I live in Cobb), and have been affected (for what it's worth) by the stickers placed in science textbooks. The stickers have a single paragraph on them: "This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered."A federal judge in Atlanta has ordered the stickers to be removed from the textbooks, indicating that they are unconstitutional.
In a ruling issued today, U.S. District Judge Clarence Cooper said the stickers violate the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution."Adopted by the school board, funded by the money of taxpayers, and inserted by school personnel, the sticker conveys an impermissible message of endorsement and tells some citizens that they are political outsiders while telling others they are political insiders," Cooper wrote in a 44-page decision.
The stickers send "a message that the school board agrees with the beliefs of Christian fundamentalists and creationists," Cooper said. "The school board has effectively improperly entangled itself with religion by appearing to take a position. Therefore, the sticker must be removed from all of the textbooks into which it has been placed."
The lawsuit challenging the disclaimers, which call evolution a "theory, not a fact," was brought by six parents who believed the disclaimers violated the principle of separation between church and state. Cooper heard three days of testimony, plus closing arguments, last November.
My big problem with the whole thing is the tax money spent first putting the stickers in all of the books in the county, and now that even more of my tax dollars will be wasted snatching the stickers OUT of all of the books in the county.There are far better things that my tax dollars should be spent on in the Cobb County schools than slapping in or yanking out stickers to satisfy the whims of overzealous school board members or judges.
Posted by: mhking at
06:49 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 353 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Open mindedness, studying things carefully and critical thinking are now unconstitutional?
Posted by: Steven J. Kelso Sr. at January 13, 2005 08:25 AM (U4SDZ)
2
I don't get it. Evolution
is a theory since there are not any good ways to prove it inconclusively. However, it's a pretty damn good theory. I don't get how rejecting the theory of evolution means you believe in creationism.
disclaimer: I believe in G-d, but there are obvious similarities among species which cannot be ignored. I do not believe that Genesis is the be all and end all of the emergence of humanity.
Posted by: david at January 14, 2005 01:36 AM (Vv/3u)
3
Uh, David. Everything was created by the same Guy dude.
Posted by: Steven J. Kelso Sr. at January 14, 2005 02:10 AM (U4SDZ)
4
Why'd they need a sticker? My textbook called it the "theory of evolution". And it's never going to go beyond that, especially since we've found all sorts of kinks in the process.
It's kinda like Newton's law of gravity. Sure, it's not the "entire truth", but you can teach Newtonion physics to grade schoolers, while the theory of relativity is quite a bit more complicated.
And I think the whole argument moot, because I consider evolution to be a statement of the current operation of the world, not the start.
There are all sorts (scientific) theories for the creation of life, but nothing conclusive.
Steven - The stickers were a "Wink Wink Nudge Nudge Know what I mean". I can see teaching the theory of evolution in that it explains animal breeding programs, optimization in nature.
My short evolution statement: Parents pass characteristics on to their offspring. Those with superior survival & breeding characteristics tend to be the ones to survive & breed, therefore those characteristics tend to survive in a species, while characteristics negative to breeding & survival tend to die off. When a new characteristic is introduced through whatever means, it is weighed the same as existing ones. If it is good, it will tend to spread through the generations, if it is bad it will tend to be eliminated.
Now, does that say anything about the creation of life?
Uh, dude, how did the one guy do it? How much of genisis is a metaphor? I don't think that the dinosaurs were a joke.
Posted by: Firethorn at January 14, 2005 06:00 AM (BPXQB)
5
Might I suggest an economical solution to your sticker problem. Perhaps you could gather the students who do not want the evolution theory in there text book and tear out the pages? Perhaps in front a few cameras (might I suggest FOX news?)A political protest that saves the taxpayers money...
Posted by: Kathy at January 14, 2005 11:16 AM (YPznq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Prince Harry, the Nazi idiot
Britian's Prince Harry, in a brainless show of monumental proportions,
donned a Nazi uniform for a costume party last week. The photo showed up on the front page of London's Sun newspaper this morning.
The prince had intended to go to a military college this fall, but this may put a kybosh on Harry's military plans.
Labour backbencher and former armed forces minister Doug Henderson said the incident demonstrated that the prince was unfit to train as a British Army officer at Sandhurst."If it was anyone else the application wouldn't be considered. It should be withdrawn immediately," Henderson said.
"A quick way of nipping it in the bud is for Harry to make it clear he has withdrawn his application for Sandhurst," he told Sky TV.
Harry is due to begin training at the elite Royal Military Academy at Sandhurst later this year.
Harry has apologized for the costume, which he was pictured in, while holding a cigarette in this morning's newspaper.
Harry is third in line for the British throne, behind his father, Prince Charles, and his older brother, Prince William.
Posted by: mhking at
06:18 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 200 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Pardon me, but the Prince would have to be an idiot to not know about Nazi Germany, Aushwitz, and Hitler and his Nazi's. He is most definatly and ignorant moron. However, it is a very good thing that he apologized for his actions.
Posted by: Susie at January 15, 2005 02:36 PM (XQutm)
2
Why hasn't Henry?Harry apologized for being at a party where guest were in Black Face?
Posted by: Boyinthedesignerbubble at January 17, 2005 02:20 PM (fLlQ8)
3
oh, come on people,prince commit mistakes too. at least he knows how to apologize, and thats what matters.
Posted by: julienne andrada at February 01, 2005 10:36 PM (4OzQ1)
4
he addimits it was a bad thing,but verybody is picking on him because hes the prince.STOP BULLYING THE YOUNG BOY,after all he is fit
Posted by: lynda at September 24, 2005 12:33 AM (cvR39)
5
leave the kid alone it was a mistake and he has apoligised over and over again
Posted by: scot at September 24, 2005 12:35 AM (cvR39)
6
ignore the top coment of susie she has made mastakes he is just a boy and he has apoligised shes a divi
Posted by: bob at September 24, 2005 12:39 AM (cvR39)
7
susie at the top of the page is a divi and she stinks
Posted by: bob at September 24, 2005 12:40 AM (cvR39)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
101kb generated in CPU 0.0308, elapsed 0.4266 seconds.
58 queries taking 0.4052 seconds, 217 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.