April 13, 2005
Bad guys show American hostage on Al Jazeera
An American citizen, taken
hostage in Iraq, was seen on a video broadcast on Al Jazeera today, begging for his life.
The tape on Wednesday showed a man sitting behind a wooden desk as three men pointed their guns towards him.He was holding what looked like a passport and a photo identification.
The US embassy spokesman in Baghdad - Bob Callahan - confirmed the captive's name as Jeffrey Ake and that the pictures appeared to be consistent with his appearance, but declined to give further details.
Aljazeera did not air the tape's audio, but said Ake had asked the US government to start a dialogue with the Iraqi resistance.
Ake was kidnapped Sunday in Iraq.
I'll link to the video once it becomes available.
Posted by: mhking at
06:12 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 147 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Just to let anyone concerned, I am praying for
Jeffrey and asking others to do the same.
I care.
I prayed for a previous captive and he escaped
there is POWER IN PRAYER
Posted by: Ellie Hitchman at April 24, 2005 12:50 PM (ess8r)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Day of the Moonbats: Stop Caterpillar
Moonbats far and wide
are protesting heavy equipment manufacturer Caterpillar today, in the name of flattened protester Rachel "Our Lady of the Royal and Blessed Pancake" Corrie.
Corrie was run over by an Israeli Defense Force bulldozer when she stepped in front of it to attempt to prevent a Palistinian house from being demolished. The house was the residence of a suicide bomber. The IDF has a practice of demolishing the homes of suicide bombers.
On April 13, join groups all over the world in opposing Caterpillar sales of home-crushing bulldozers to Israel. That day, Caterpillar shareholders will meet in Chicago and will discuss a resolution on sales of bulldozers to Israel. We're calling on groups to organize local demonstrations at CAT-related locations, such as board of directors' offices or CAT dealerships, to send a strong message that cooperation in human rights abuses is unacceptable.The Caterpillar Corporation has been in the business of war profiteering, profiting from the violation of the human rights of the Palestinian people and from the escalating cycle of violence between the Israelis and the Palestinians.
Like I said, the moonbats are doing their thing all over the globe. I'm sure they're going to sue AT&T for letting the IDF use telephones, or perhaps Sony for letting them listen to the radio next.
To hear them tell it, all of Caterpillar's products have minds of their own - kind of like the old ABC Movie of the Week and Theodore Sturgeon science fiction story Killdozer.
What's next, to insist that Bob the Builder is evil because he uses a bulldozer?
Posted by: mhking at
05:41 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 282 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I think that Cat should respond to the demands of the protestors and follow their "good citizen" statement on their website by providing deep discounts to the IDF.
After all, nothing's more "good citizen" by providing tools to PREVENT terrorism.
Posted by: Laurence Simon at April 13, 2005 06:19 AM (uBCxH)
2
"flattened protester Rachel "Our Lady of the Royal and Blessed Pancake" Corrie."
Brilliant!
Posted by: Sgt Fluffy at April 14, 2005 06:28 PM (gBuyL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Crazy Al: Racism behind fund-raising investigation
Al Sharpton insists he
did nothing wrong in terms of fundraising for his Presidential campaign.
"I assure you that everything handed to us was properly filed," said Sharpton, referring to $140,000 in donations collected by two shady businessmen who later were caught by a wiretap speculating that Sharpton had not reported most of that money to the Federal Election Commission."It is very suspicious that we have a pattern here," Sharpton said yesterday, citing both the FBI's secret videotape and bugging surveillance of a 2003 meeting he had with the fund-raisers and an FBI microphone found in the office of Philadelphia Mayor John Street, who also is black.
"People understand what this smells like," Sharpton said at a press conference outside The Post, which detailed the federal probe yesterday in a front-page story.
"I know that there were irregularities in Mr. [John] Edwards's [presidential campaign] . . . I know there were questions about John Kerry's mortgaging his house for his campaign. I don't know of any of them being wiretapped," Sharpton said.
What is this, the line of the day -- former candidates surfacing to cry racism? Just this past weekend, John Kerry implied racially offensive tactics behind the Ohio results. Who's next? Dennis Kucinich tossing paper airplanes?
Posted by: mhking at
04:00 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 218 words, total size 2 kb.
Gibson to film John Paul biopic?
It looks like one of Mel Gibson's next projects
will be a biographic movie of the life of Pope John Paul II.
Gibson, a 'devote' Roman Catholic, got a jump start by sending a production crew to Rome to film the Pope's funeral last Friday.Mel's "The Passion Of The Christ" was one of Hollywood's biggest box-office hits last year and he's already been talking about doing further religious themed movies such as "The Revolt Of The Maccabees", the story behind the Jewish holiday Hanukkah.
No word from the Catholic Church one way or the other, but given the love that everyone has for the late Pontiff, I'd have to figure that they'd all love the idea.
Posted by: mhking at
03:53 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 127 words, total size 1 kb.
April 12, 2005
Ketchup Boy fooled by The Onion
John Kerry showed up Sunday
whining about "voter intimidation" of minorities citing an old adage that says that Republicans should vote on Tuesday, while Democrats should vote on Wednesday.
Kerry even cited "evidence" (though he could not produce said "evidence") that fliers were passed out to that effect.
Kerry cited examples Sunday of how people were duped into not voting."Leaflets are handed out saying Democrats vote on Wednesday, Republicans vote on Tuesday. People are told in telephone calls that if you've ever had a parking ticket, you're not allowed to vote," he said.
What Kerry apparently didn't realize is that the joke is much older than this election - I recall hearing it as far back as the Reagan administration - and that the source of it for this election cycle looks to be
from The Onion, the satirical newspaper and website produced in Madison, WI.
In other words, it was a joke. Whether Kerry figured that out or not is still up for debate.
Posted by: mhking at
11:22 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 187 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Nice try. Kerry got the info. from this Washington Post article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12514-2004Oct30.html
An excerpt:
"in Allegheny County...election officials received a flurry of phone calls about fliers handed out at a Pittsburgh area mall and mailed to an unknown number of homes. The flier, distributed on bogus but official-looking stationery with a county letterhead, told voters that "due to immense voter turnout expected on Tuesday," the election had been extended. Republicans should vote Tuesday, Nov. 2, it said -- and Democrats on Wednesday. A criminal investigation has been launched."
Don't use Michelle Malkin as your only source for info. She's a complete hack.
Posted by: Terrence at April 12, 2005 11:31 AM (7tpGj)
2
Darn. Terrence beat me to it. I had that Post articel all ready to put up here.
Terrence is also correct that using Malkin for an information source is a bad move. She's wrong a great percentage of the time and her pieces are consistently misleading.
Posted by: carla at April 12, 2005 07:51 PM (9muHb)
3
Whether this story is true or not, I live in Illinois, which is a Blue State and I had my voter registration card with me that showed I was a registered voter and somehow my name got deleted from the roll and was only allowed to vote provisionally (which really didn't count). There were so many inconsistencies in this election it wasn't funny.
Posted by: cynthia at April 12, 2005 08:02 PM (IqwRh)
4
First off, this is being reported in several places, as Michael (now?) notes. But that's really beside the point. If you really believed that kind of schoolkid nonsense and didn't vote, you're too stupid to be selecting the President of the United States.
Why didn't your provisional vote count, Cynthia? Mistakes like what happened to you are why there's the capability for provisional voting in the first place. Once they confirmed you were deleted erroneously, they should have counted your vote like any other. Did you leave out some detail, or are you really unaware of what a provisional vote really is? If the latter, it sure wouldn't be funny - but I'd certainly find the irony humorous.
Posted by: Chris at April 13, 2005 04:41 AM (9VCzx)
5
Chris,
I registered, I have a voter registration card, I was the 2nd person in line to vote, and I voted provisionally because someone took me off the roll for whatever reason. I was not the only person that this happened to. You can call me stupid, or whatever, but this is the reality.
Posted by: Cynthia at April 13, 2005 07:18 AM (Aqoa4)
6
So did they count your vote or what since you were rightfully registered? You never answered the question.
Posted by: Jade at April 13, 2005 04:41 PM (q1GeV)
Posted by: Cynthia at April 14, 2005 04:05 PM (Aqoa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 11, 2005
MJ asks his parents to raise his kids if he goes to jail
Michael Jackson has reportedly asked his aging parents to
take custody of his children, 8 year-old Prince Michael, seven year-old Paris and two year-old Prince Michael II, in the event of his conviction and imprisonment.
The house is Jackson's childhood home where he allegedly suffered physical and verbal abuse under his father, Joe Jackson.
Despite the star's reported unhappy relationship with his father, Joe has been at his son's side in court throughout the trial.However, Jackson's ex-wife and mother of his two eldest children, Debbie Rowe, is so unhappy with the decision she is fighting for custody.
Rowe signed away her parental rights in 2001, telling a judge: "I had the children for him to be a father, not for me to be a mother."
But she launched a legal battle to retract the ruling after hearing Jackson was charged with child abuse and his parents were to be her children's guardians.
As witness after witness tied to decade-old accusations surfaces, pundits say that the likelihood of Jackson's conviction continues to grow.
Or is he planning to move in with Roman Polanski in Europe?
Posted by: mhking at
05:45 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 210 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"Raise my kids. Because you're so good at that."
Posted by: Dave Munger at April 12, 2005 04:50 PM (HwaBs)
2
I dont want Michael to go to jail for something he did not do. He really hasnt learned how to be mean like any medium,average or poor person. He has to learn to protect his property and person from outsiders. In the event that he does go to jail, where will he go and can I get on the visitors list ahead of time?
Posted by: allison at June 02, 2005 08:35 PM (DYRR3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Tiger on the 16th at Augusta. Unbelievable!
By now, you've seen Tiger Woods' incredible birdie shot on the 16th at Augusta National in yesterday's final round of The Masters. But for those of you who simply have not seen it, the incredible shot has already been turned into a Nike commercial by marketing guru Joseph Jaffe. Of course, you can see the commercial in 30 and 60 second forms at Jaffe's site.
Posted by: mhking at
04:03 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 79 words, total size 1 kb.
Justifying The Brotherhood
The Conservative Brotherhood's expansion (
that I mentioned last week) was noted this weekend by
Wizbang (among other places), and appears to have caused a bit of a dust-up (at least in the comments on their entry). The predictable bitching and moaning is coming from both of the expected places - those who whine about the notion of a collection of "black" conservatives versus a collection of "white" conservatives, as well as the soul patrol regulars who are so enamored with the term "uncle tom" that they toss it at us with mindless abandon.
Feh.
Posted by: mhking at
03:55 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 108 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Although, I'm not a conservative, and I don't fit neatly in the liberal category either, I still don't think you should have to explain why you guys started this brotherhood.
Posted by: cynthia at April 11, 2005 04:22 AM (IqwRh)
2
I have some experience with the overall results of the populace segregating itself into groups of race. I am an American, White, Male, Middle Class, Southern, Conservative, Country Boy. By now, I'm sure you have your opinions of me. In spite of what some may think. I have no problems, fears, hatreds, or any other negative generalizations for others.
In college, I was a part of a student club that was composed of the people that were left after the Black club, the Italian club, the Women club, the Hispanic club, the Asiain club, the Middle Eastern Club,etc etc. The idea here is to illustrate the idea that there was no American, Not black, Not Italian, Not Hispanic, Not Asian, Not Female, Not Middle Eastern, Not etc... club. We were a white club by default and as such, we were labeled as the white supremicist racist group even though we were merely an engineering society, not a social political club. I was considered a racist by assiciation with people that were not Black, not Italian, not female...you get it. I guess I know how it feels now...
I got excited when Wizbang posted the link to the brotherhood and I have added it to my favorites list of blogs that I read. More power to ya but remember the nameless Whities that have to deal with the consequences of being a Male White American country boy with no minority status to build a website around. Yea, I know what your saying..."It must be tuff being a White guy in America these days". Too funny... All I am saying is don't hate me because you left me behind.
Posted by: schwerv at April 11, 2005 10:35 AM (27inq)
3
Oh, this is TOO DAMN FUNNY!!!!
Project 21.
'nuff said.
Posted by: DarkStar at April 11, 2005 11:45 AM (cnw1A)
4
Thanks very much for this post. I've had some conflicting feelings of my own on this. I tried hard to articulate them in a
post in response to Cobb's original call to organize, but got no response from him. I'd welcome further reaction in trying to work through some of my own reaction.
I think I understand the desire to band together, and have seen enough unpleasantness to know that people in this world don't get treated fairly. But it still hurts to not be eligible for The Club, just like it would for anyone else who would be in the same position whether or not I wanted to join in. (I didn't join my old boss' Polish-American club, but I was happy they let non-Poles like me in.) How does a generic whitish American deal with what looks on its face as something not truly colorblind, which I see as desirable?
Granted, it's not like dealing with guys with racist badges in my restaurant back in the day, but it is something that excludes me because I'm not of their ethnic group. I'm willing to listen, just haven't gotten any response.
If you have the time I'd love a comment from you--just remove the spamtrap from my email address. Or just drop a note on either blog.
You were one of the first blogosphere people to react to me on my blog, and for that I remain thankful. I'm willing to listen. I could use some response from the Brotherhood with consideration from my own perspective.
I'm dumping a lot on you, I know. If you've got the time, I'm willing to listen.
Posted by: Chap at April 11, 2005 06:31 PM (wp4/x)
5
Trackbacks broken on this post, btw. I linked on my page.
Posted by: chap at April 11, 2005 06:59 PM (wp4/x)
6
Refuse to accept unequal application of laws in any direction. The rest should take care of itself.
Posted by: Walter E. Wallis at April 12, 2005 11:48 AM (MBCZx)
7
I think the thing to question in the criticism is the claim that colorblindness is even a good thing, never mind required. If we ignore negative racial realities out of a pretend sense that we don't recognize the racial categories that are a reality in our culture, then they will continue and will continue to be bad.
Posted by: Jeremy Pierce at April 12, 2005 12:35 PM (Ihkjb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 09, 2005
Prince Charles shakes hands with thug dictator Mugabe
Prince Charles has caused a bit of an uproar
by shaking hands with thuggish Zimbabwe dictator Robert Mugabe yesterday at Pope John Paul II's funeral.
Prince Charles was sitting one space away from Mugabe, and was caught unawares during the portion of the mass when the members of the congregation "exchange the peace," a time of mutual reconciliation and greeting.
A Clarence House spokesman said the prince "finds the current Zimbabwean regime abhorrent" and "was not in a position to avoid shaking Mr Mugabe's hand".The spokesman added: "He has supported the Zimbabwe Defence and Aid Fund which works with those being oppressed by the regime.
"The prince also recently met Pius Ncube, the Archbishop of Bulawayo, an outspoken critic of the government."
A Foreign Office spokesman said seating arrangements at the funeral were made by the Vatican.
But Labour MEP Glenys Kinnock, who has called for the EU to get tougher with the Mugabe regime, said shaking his hand was not "sensible".
She added: "I am sure that by now Prince Charles regrets shaking Mugabe's hand.
"However, this is yet another failure of the establishment, of people with power and responsibility in the international community, to be sensitive enough about how to respond to this man."
MEP Richard Corbett said Prince Charles should have refused to shake Mr Mugabe's hand.
He said: "This was a golden opportunity to deliberately and very visibly refuse to shake hands with this man.
"To fail to do so was, frankly, stupid."
Mugabe sidestepped an EU ban on travel in order to attend the Vatican funeral service. Mugabe was able to travel because the Vatican is a soverign state, separate from the European Union.
Posted by: mhking at
07:58 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 295 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The Vatican is a landlocked country with no airport. How did he get there from Zimbabwe if not through a third country?
It's typical of these sophisticated EU/UN types. There good at making rules, not too good at enforcing them.
Posted by: Mike at April 09, 2005 04:24 PM (4mKln)
2
Because visitors to the Vatican are protected by diplomatic privilege from the airport to St Pete's. That's the only reason why Mugabe went; I mean he's called the local Cardinal a loonie for calling for Mugabe to be defeated in the recent 'fair' election so he is not the Catholic Church's best friend. The whole point is he craves the attention and that is why he went.
I'd be interested to know if Grace Mugabe managed to sneak into the shops and spend the entire defence budget on clothes as she does each year....
Posted by: dave t at April 10, 2005 02:39 AM (Wha2D)
3
If I were Camilla, I wouldn't let the hand that touched Mugabe touch me.
Posted by: BobG at April 10, 2005 11:58 AM (2qhVP)
4
Hie' I don't see why there is such a big fuss about President Mugabe shaking hands with Prince Charles. The Prince is true gentleman and he did the right thing, this was a funeral where everyone should share the same goal, which was to mourn the Pope and not to try and express your political views. Many rivals shook hands so why criticize Charles for been a true diplomat for shaking hands with President Mugabe. Tony Blair and the rest of his delegation should be ashamed off themselves for fleeing from Mugabe. President of Israel shook hands with the leader of Iran, showing real diplomacy. ItÂ’s a shame that Britain still have people who think primitively like Glenys Kinnock.
Posted by: Chats at April 12, 2005 08:03 AM (kP0jA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 08, 2005
Eric Rudolph pleads guilty to all charges in exchange for life instead of death
Eric Robert Rudolph, accused of the Centennial Olympic Park bombing nine years ago, along with two other bombings in metro Atlanta and one in Birmingham, has
agreed to plead guilty to all the charges against him in exchange for a life sentence.
Rudolph has signed agreements with the U.S. Attorneys' Offices in Birmingham and Atlanta in which he agreed to plead guilty to the three Atlanta bombings and the Birmingham bombing and agreed to waive all appeals. The plea agreements provide for multiple life sentences for Rudolph without the possibility of parole."The many victims of Eric Rudolph's terrorist attacks in Atlanta and Birmingham can rest assured that Rudolph will spend the rest of his life behind bars," said Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales. "The best interests of justice are served by resolution of this case and by the skillful operation that secured the dangerous explosives buried in North Carolina."
Rudolph is scheduled to plead guilty to the Northern District of Alabama indictment Wednesday before U.S. District Judge Lynwood Smith at the federal courthouse in Birmingham. On the same day, the U.S. Marshal's Service will transport Rudolph to Atlanta, where he is scheduled to plead guilty before U.S. District Judge Charles A. Pannell, Jr., at the federal courthouse in Atlanta.
Pursuant to the plea agreements, Rudolph disclosed to the government the existence and locations of more than 250 pounds of dynamite buried in several locations in Western North Carolina. Three of the locations were relatively near populated areas, including one location where Rudolph buried a fully constructed dynamite bomb with a detached detonator, the press release says.
At least 40 pounds of bomb-making material, mostly dynamite, was found near an armory in Murphy, N.C., near where the task force was based to search for him, according to a source close to the investigation. Authorities also found dynamite scattered throughout the North Carolina woods where agents were looking for him. Allegedly, most of the dynamite was taken from a rock quarry near Cherokee, N.C.
One woman was killed and more than a hundred injured at the Centennial Olympic Park bombing.
A second bombing occured in early 1997 at an abortion clinic in Sandy Springs. Once first responders and police arrived at the building where the bombing took place, another bomb went off in a trash dumpster, resulting in several injuries. One more bombing took place in Atlanta, at a lesbian bar, The Otherside about a month later.
Early in 1998, a bombing attributed to Rudolph happened at an abortion clinic in Birmingham, resulting in two deaths.
Rudolph then disappeared into the hills of North Carolina, not to been seen until his capture two years ago.
The plea deal, set to be entered in Atlanta next Wednesday, will permit Rudolph to avoid a probable death sentence.
Posted by: mhking at
12:27 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 498 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I remember watching TV the night of the bombing because my girlfriend at the time was in ATL for the Olympics. I thought it was a camera
man or male photographer that died of a heart attack during the bombing.
Was the woman referred to someone that died more directly as a result of the explosion or am I mistaken on the sex of the press person who died?
Posted by: Jeff at April 12, 2005 01:19 PM (ifPXk)
2
Alice Hawthorne was fatally injured by shrapnel from the explosion itself.
If memory serves, a cameraman (I'm pretty sure he was Romanian, but I could be mistaken) died of a heart attack en route to covering the explosion.
I remember the night it happened - we had just moved into a new apartment; I had just dozed off when my wife shook me awake. I ended up watching live coverage all night long.
Posted by: Michael at April 12, 2005 03:06 PM (bJ0qq)
3
That sounds right about the Romanian, I had forgotten about the shrapnel death.
Posted by: Jeff at April 13, 2005 07:23 AM (ifPXk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Fare thee well, Holy Father...
Pope John Paul II has been laid to rest in the tombs underneath the Vatican. The Pope's body has been placed inside of a simple cypress coffin, which was placed inside of a zinc liner, which in turn has been placed inside a walnut coffin inscribed with a cross and Pope John Paul II's personal crest.
Posted by: mhking at
11:13 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.
April 07, 2005
The Brotherhood expands
The Conservative Brotherhood, of which I'm proudly a charter member, has expanded it's ranks by three.
Tavares Forby holds down the fort at BlackPundit.org. He's young, Republican and an electrical engineer. He comes from the streets, but knows where his head is at. Laser-beam penetrating logic, a quick tongue, and enthusiasm caught all out attention when he stepped up. We're proud to have him.
Ol' Sarge at The Hunter's Herald is Demond Hunter, back home from serving our nation in the mean streets of Iraq. He's a NASCAR dad, and I'll even forgive him for rooting for the Tarheels over the Illini.
Joseph C. Phillips is a man on a conservative mission across this entire nation. You'd recognize his face from his acting work - running the gamut from General Hospital to The District to The Cosby Show. He was one of the speakers at last summer's Republican National Convention, and he is a family man in the classic sense. I've only spoken with him a few times, but he sounds like a better cook than I am (not that cooking better'n me is a difficult feat).
We're proud and happy to add them to the ranks of the Brotherhood. You can find all our links over on the left menu rail, and you can find strong opinions and fantastic conversation from each one of us.
Posted by: mhking at
06:06 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 232 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Mike,
In my opinion, you are the best of the best with this site. I am still new to the blog stuff and don't know the "lingo" and technical stuff. I do read them alot and wanted you to know that I make a point to read your site daily. Keep up the great work and I will make a point to check out the new "expansions" to the brotherhood.
W.NM.
Posted by: W.NM. at April 08, 2005 01:17 PM (rp7I2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Security guard testimony: MJ gave oral sex to underaged boy in '93
The MJ fans are sure to be in a tizzy now. A former Neverland Ranch security guard testified today, and told jurors that he had actually seen
Michael Jackson performing oral sex on an underaged boy while Jackson and the young boy were nude outside a shower in 1993.
The defense tried to counter Ralph Chacon's testimony by painting him as a disgruntled former employee forced into bankruptcy by an unsuccessful civil suit against Jackson.Chacon testified that Jackson and the boy -- who was involved in a civil suit against Jackson in 1993 -- were engaged in "passionate" kissing and were caressing before the sex act.
He told prosecutors that the sex act occurred in late 1992 or 1993.
He said the incident began around midnight, when he saw Jackson and the boy, who was 9 or 10 at the time of the incident, laughing and playing in a whirlpool spa. He said they later went to a bathroom on the ranch grounds, which contained a shower.
Chacon testified he was walking by the room more than a half hour later when he heard Jackson and the boy together in the shower. He said he first walked away, but he returned because he thought to himself, "Hey, what's going on here? There's a grown man in the shower with a boy."
He said he looked through a window, and he saw Jackson and the boy standing naked in a well-lit room outside the shower. Jackson caressed the boy and kissed his hair, then Jackson moved his lips to the boy's genital area and performed oral sex, Chacon said.
Chacon said walked away and later saw Jackson giving the boy a piggyback ride. Both were wearing only towels, he said.
He also said that on another occasion, he saw Jackson passionately kissing the same boy in front of a display of Peter Pan dolls, and "Jackson's hands went down to the boy's crotch area."
This marks the first time that testimony relating to the earlier accusation has been brought up in open court.
Many professional trial-watchers have indicated that since the judge in the case is allowing testimony from prior circumstances - going to a pattern of behavior on the part of Jackson - that Jackson's legal team would be on the ropes under a barrage of bombshell accusations, perhaps leading them to try to settle the case and reduce the amount of time that Jackson would have to spend in jail. As of this point, there is no indication of a plea bargain on Jackson's part. 46 year-old Jackson insists he is not guilty of the child molestation charges brought against him.
Posted by: mhking at
11:06 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 470 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I don't know if everything that is said about Michael is true, but one thing for sure, he was really not smart(putting it nicely) for putting himself in this position again. If he got off once, why would he put himself in this position again? Why?????
Posted by: Cynthia at April 07, 2005 12:39 PM (Aqoa4)
2
Tell me please, why wait years before speaking up that you saw this kind of act?
Some people besides Jacko belong in jail: the kids' parents who let them go over Jacko's house and sleep in the man's room, and people who saw things but didn't notify the police.
Posted by: DarkStar at April 07, 2005 01:00 PM (BbmiU)
3
Dark Star,
You do have a point here.
Posted by: Cynthia at April 07, 2005 01:20 PM (Aqoa4)
4
DS - You DO have a point. The remainder of the CNN article (as well as the LA Times piece I saw earlier) I linked to here points out that Meserau's cross brought up the fact that the guard was part of a class-action suit brought about by disgruntled former employees of Jackson's. Beyond that, the only reason that I could see him not coming forward before now was the settlement of the 1993 accusations.
I'm certain there has to be more evidence from the prior cases that Sneddon plans to bring up - if this is it, the question marks will remain.
Posted by: mhking at April 07, 2005 06:12 PM (bJ0qq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
New sport emerging: tossing food at conservatives
A
pie was tossed at David Horowitz of Frontpagemag.com-fame last night during a Butler University lecture last night.
Witnesses say there was some "pushing and shoving" when Horowitz's supporters followed the pie-throwers out of the hall, but the attackers got away. After the incident, Horowitz completed his lecture.
A Butler spokesman called the incident "deplorable." Horowitz has criticized what he calls the "leftist domination" of college campuses. On his blog Wednesday night, Horowitz spoke of "a wave of leftist violence against conservative speakers on college campuses."
And even though the competor didn't score big points with their attempt, last night's pie-toss at Horowitz isn't unusual or outside the norm, it seems.
Last week, salad dressing was thrown onto Pat Buchanan at Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo, MI, while Weekly Standard editor and Fox News contributor Bill Kristol was "pied" at an appearance at Earlham College in Richmond, IN. Last fall, columnist Ann Coulter was nearly hit by a pie during a speech at the University of Arizona.
Posted by: mhking at
09:09 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 194 words, total size 2 kb.
1
well, now we know one thing, we liberals have much better aim then you conservatives.
Posted by: steve at April 07, 2005 10:06 AM (PqSU9)
2
They can't legitimately attack the message so they go for the messenger with a pie. Liberals have so much class....NOT!!
Posted by: Odd Brian at April 07, 2005 02:46 PM (b4q3c)
Posted by: jcrue at April 08, 2005 01:53 PM (wNzN0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 06, 2005
Village Voice: GOP wants Bubba for SCOTUS to shut Hillary out from White House
I've heard of cloak and dagger political plots, but this one has to take the proverbial cake.
A new article by James Ridgeway in the new Village Voice suggests that the Republican party has a wild-eyed plot to put former President Bill Clinton on the Supreme Court in order to nullify any chance Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (Moonbat-NY) has of winning the White House in 2008.
Last weekend Bob Novak described a novel scheme, supposedly emanating from the fevered brain of Karl Rove: Stop Hillary by putting Bill on the Supreme Court.Here's what's supposed to happen: Bush names either Clarence Thomas or Antonin Scalia to be chief justice. That leaves one vacancy on the court. Then he appoints Bill Clinton to the court.
The thought of adulterer Clinton on the court (think Monica as clerk) sends right-wingers up the wall. But wait a minute. Think it through: Next, Bill Frist—Senate majority leader, Terri Schiavo defender, and himself a presidential hopeful—immediately moves to hold up Bill's nomination. Next, Harry Reid, the Democratic minority leader in the Senate, cuts a deal to free the conservative judicial nominations now backed up in Congress in return for letting Clinton on the court.
Once on the court, Clinton is out of the picture when it comes to campaigning for Hillary or anyone else in 2008. What to do about Hillary? Americans may differ on whether she should be president, but almost everyone will agree that the country could not stand to have two Clintons dominating two branches of government.
One political insider was quoted in the article as saying, "He couldn't be any worse than Souter."
Just damn, indeed.
Posted by: mhking at
02:27 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 301 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I thought the plan was to put Slick Willie in charge of the U.N. because there is no way she could be elected if he was Secretary General.
Damn. You miss one dues payment and suddenly you stopped getting the unsigned memos form the VRWC.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at April 06, 2005 04:09 PM (U3CvV)
2
But I thought that CLinton was a pariah on the campaign trail?!
I also thought that his line
"Elect the man you trust," was actually a veiled attempt to steer support to Bush.
Rumor has always had it that Ronald Reagan voted for Clinton in '92. Bubba, as a justice, might actually show a surprisingly moderate-to-conservative judicial temperment.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at April 07, 2005 05:55 PM (t7Q/9)
3
"Just damn."
My thoughts exactly. As in, what crack have conservatives been smokin' to come up with such inanity.
Posted by: jab at April 07, 2005 07:45 PM (8aXvS)
4
That's what I call being creative -- a SCOTUS candidate that's been disbarred!
Posted by: Fausta at April 08, 2005 11:47 AM (G3tVf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Why go nuts regulating cornrows?
Cornrows & Co. was founded by the husband and wife team of Taalib-Din Uqdah and Pamela Farrell in the Nation's Capitol in 1980 to provide an underserved clientele quality hair braiding services.
After the company built an excellent reputation and a clientele of more than 20,000, bureaucrats ordered him to cease and desist.
Local bureaucrats ordered Uqdah to cease and desist, or be "subject to criminal prosecution." Why? Because he didn't have a license. "It's a safety issue," said the regulators. Those who run a hair salon must have a cosmetology license. The chemicals they use dyeing or perming hair might hurt someone. Hair dye is hardly a serious safety threat, but even if it were, Cornrows & Co. didn't dye or perm hair. They only braided it. That didn't matter, said the Cosmetology Board -- they still had to get a license. In order to get one, Uqdah would have to pay about $5,000 to take more than 1,000 hours of courses at a beauty school.
Uqdah thought he understood why the cosmetology board wanted to shut down his salon: "Money -- other salons don't like the competition."
Even if licensing boards intend to protect the public, in time they are captured by the people who care most. Who cares most? Not consumers -- you don't get your hair done that often, and even if you did, you don't care enough about it to want to join a regulatory bureaucracy. Innovators don't join the boards; they're busy innovating. Scientists, economists, doctors, and others with genuine expertise in safety and commerce don't join the boards, either. They're busy doing more important things. So boards are usually captured by the licensees, the established businesses. William Jackson, a former member of the Washington, D.C., Cosmetology Board, admitted, "The board, 90 percent of the time, are salon owners."
Uqdah didn't close up shop. He hired the Institute for Justice, a legal firm, and sued in federal court. The District ultimately changed their law.
Uqdah and Farrell went on to establish the American Hairbraiders & Natural Haircare Association to help others in their situation across the nation to stave off predatory cosmetology laws, and educate the public about their industry and art.
Posted by: mhking at
05:23 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 376 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Very interesting article
Posted by: Cynthia at April 06, 2005 08:37 AM (Aqoa4)
2
Thanks for this article! John Stossel has some similar things to say about the subject--turn out the guilds want to maintain their exclusivity, and hair braiders are up against the cosmetologists. Fascinating example of why regulations creep up over time.
Posted by: Chap at April 06, 2005 09:48 AM (wp4/x)
3
Sounds like a story to point to when someone tries to draw a distinction between "people" and "special interest groups."
Without the hairbraiders "special interest group", regular people who want to run a business braiding hair are at risk of getting screwed.
Somebody give those guys an award.
Posted by: Gib at April 06, 2005 10:23 AM (PsC2M)
4
Hey, good for them. It's not often that you take on city hall and actually win--even when you're in the right.
A ridiculous law.
Posted by: zombyboy at April 06, 2005 11:58 AM (1yNBe)
5
Louisiana has that one beat. You have to have a license to arrange and sell flowers. Yep! Florist license. No idea how many lives were damaged by improper placement of pansies before the government stepped in to stop the carnage...
Posted by: mostly cajun at April 06, 2005 05:34 PM (6YUgO)
6
Requiring licenses for hairdressers and florists is ridiculous and so is requiring licenses for doctors and lawyers. Just like John Stossel said... those licensors are often made up of those who are in the business so they can keep their competition in check.
We've been conditioned to think that the government is so wise for requiring that doctors obtain a license, yet we don't step back and look at it objectively. Because a doctor has a license, that does not keep him from killing you with the wrong medication or misdiagnosing a disease. In fact, I think it does absolutley nothing to prevent medical malpractice. What kind of test do doctors really have to take to get their license? I seriously doubt it's a very stringent test.
My self, I check out a doctors history. I get referrals. I try to find patients of that doctor and ask what the doctor is like. But our government takes advantage of people who are too lazy and incompotent to take such responsibility for themselves. They prefer their false sense of security that comes with a government issued piece of paper.
Posted by: Clay Rains at June 12, 2005 10:16 AM (bFgSs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Star Wars geeks line up outside wrong theater
Asq4WpuymMJ:www.liningup.net/media/images/black_vader_logo.jpg" align=left hspace=3>Star Wars fans
got in line this week for the late May opening of
Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith at Grauman's Chinese Theater in Hollywood, just as they have before each of the prior Star Wars flicks.
The only problem this time: it isn't opening at the Chinese - it's opening at the ArcLight a few blocks down the street.
"We've heard all this before," said Sarah Sprague, one of the designated spokesmen for the group. In 1999 and 2002, there were plenty of rumors (ultimately false) that the previous two pics weren't going to open at the Chinese.This year the rumors seem to be true. Fox and the ArcLight haven't finalized their "Star Wars" deal, but execs on both sides say they expect "Revenge of the Sith" to play the ArcLight and not the Chinese.
As theaters normally do, the ArcLight is likely to ask Fox that it be the only theater playing "Revenge of the Sith" in the immediate area. And even if it doesn't, Paramount confirmed it will open "The Longest Yard" at the Chinese the week after "Revenge," which means Fox won't want to book the theater for just one week. (Paramount partly owns Mann Theaters.)
The assorted geeks are chronicling their time in line as they raise money for the Starlight Foundation at
http://liningup.net/.
Posted by: mhking at
04:30 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 237 words, total size 2 kb.
Pope-vision continues
All-Pope-all-the-time coverage of the death of Pope John Paul II continues with his funeral, set to get underway from Vatican City Friday morning at 4A Eastern Time. All the major networks (ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, CNN, MSNBC, FNC, NWI, BBC World, CBC, Univision, Telemundo, C-Span), along with Catholic television network EWTN will carry coverage live - most coverage gets underway at about 3A ET.
The Conclave that will choose the next Pope (doesn't that sound like the ultimate reality show? Where's Mark Burnett when you need him?) is set to be sequestered at the Sistine Chapel in Vatican City on Monday, April 18. 116 Cardinals will get to vote for their choice to be the new Pope. The person elected will need to receive two-thirds of the votes, plus one to ascend to the throne of St. Peter.
Four votes per day will take place until the job gets done. The only signals we will have in the rest of the world are black smoke from the Sistine Chapel's chimney if there is no pope chosen, and white smoke accompanied by the peal of bells if there is a new pope chosen.
Posted by: mhking at
03:59 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 203 words, total size 1 kb.
1
There's an addition - there'll be a bell ringing, to make extra sure that the message is clear that a pope has been elected.
Posted by: Lola at April 08, 2005 08:59 AM (V1eTE)
2
senores por favor parar de hacer novelas estupidas como los plateados y todas esas porquerias que estan pasando por las noches pongan dramas BRASILENOS ACTORES DE ESCUELA NO ESA BOLA DE NINOS HIJOS DE ARTISTAS MEXICANOS QUE APARTE DE HACER EL RIDICULO NO SABEN ACTUAR NO SEAN RACISTA IGNORANTES Y ESTUPIDOS PONGAN LAS COSAS BUENAS POR LA NOCHE Y LA BASURA DE DIA QUE LA GENTE QUE LABORA TIENE DERECHO A VER COSAS BUENAS CON TODO RESPETO TODO LO QUE ESTA PASANDO Y VA PASAR POR LAS NOCHES ES PURA BASURA INDEPENDIENTEMENTE DEL PROGRAMA DE CANDELA FERRO NEVELA BRASILENA OIGAN LEAN BRASILEIRAS CALIDAD NO MAS BASURA FELICITACIONES POR EL COLOR DEL PECADO QUE CALIDAD SUPER NOVELA. LO DEMAS EL ESPEJO LOS PLANCHADOS PURA BASURA RESPETEN A LA GENTE EDUCADA PORFAVOR EL ECCHO DE SER POBRE NO SIGNIFICA SER IGNORANTE CONCIDENRENLO QUE LA GENTE ACTUAL QUE LOS ACESORA FUERA DE CAMARA ES UN COMPLETO ANIMAL QUE NO SABE DE MERCADO TECNIA Y PUBLICIDAD UN IGNORANTE Y CONTRA ESO NO SE PUEDE
Posted by: sergio fuentes at May 20, 2005 06:52 AM (pO1tP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 05, 2005
PJ has lung cancer
ABC
World News Tonight anchor Peter Jennings announced this morning that he has
lung cancer.
He is set to begin chemo treatments next week.
As you all know, this is a challenge. I begin chemo-therapy next week. I will continue to do the broadcast.There will be good days and bad, which means that some days I may be cranky and some days really cranky!
Jennings was diagnosed yesterday.
In an e-mail, ABC News President David Westin indicated that PJ would continue to do the program, but that he would be off from time to time, depending on how he's doing. Elizabeth Vargas, Charlie Gibson and others will sit in for him on WNT in those instances.
Posted by: mhking at
06:33 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 131 words, total size 1 kb.
April 04, 2005
Al Gore's Current will replace Newsworld International on 8/1
Newsworld International (NWI), the little-watched
Canadian-based international news network that formerly owned by USA Networks before their purchase by former Vice-President Al Gore, will go away on August 1, as
Gore's brainchild, Current, will debut in it's place.
Current will be a news network geared toward the 18-34 age-range with MTV-style short-form programming.
Al Gore and Joel Hyatt announced Current's new name and target start date today.
The new network will try to build on the audience of 20 million homes that NWI has from DirecTV, and digital cable deals on some Comcast and Time Warner systems.
Gore and Hyatt have recruited talent from the exsisting broacast universe to spin their form of news both in front of and behind the camera. On-air talent includes Gotham Chopra from the old Channel One network (and creator of the comic book Bulletproof Monk) and Laura Ling, also from Channel One.
Behind the camera, names include Chief Operating Officer Mark Goldman (former programming president of Channel One), Anne Kallin Zehren (former publisher of Teen People) & former ad executive Joanna Drake Earl.
Sounds like they're going to try to shove "news" in the form of blipverts down our collective throats (for any of you who remember the old Max Headroom storyline). I'm sure they'll fail miserably. Even more reason for me to get my Canadian satellite system - a Canadian dish will at least let me continue to watch CBC's The National and ITV's evening newscast.
Posted by: mhking at
12:33 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 270 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I can't believe you watch the CBC on purpose! Maybe we could switch channel line ups.
Posted by: Dex at April 04, 2005 03:21 PM (kO17P)
2
Gotta see what the other side does -- besides, when they're not pontificating, "The National" is actually a half-way decent newsmagazine.
Posted by: mhking at April 04, 2005 03:38 PM (bJ0qq)
3
Maybe they will show Futurama - the best thing to come of Al Gore (I think his daughter or neice or something worked on that show). His guest spots are some of the best stuff he has ever done in all his years of "public service."
I think he should leave politics and do voice-acting. He is pretty good at that. Wasn't very good at the former anyways.
Posted by: TheRoyalFamily at April 05, 2005 01:32 PM (v+TiR)
Posted by: Lois at May 30, 2005 04:23 AM (HoSBk)
5
The main reason I bought DirecTV was to get OLN for the Tour de France and to get better INTERNATIONAL news. I don't need more talking heads on TV, more myopic, moronic American centric programming that have the audacity to say they program "news" shows. I want news from OUTSIDE the US, I want alternative perspectives, I want Deutsche Welle on my television. I LIKE The National and Peter Mansbridge, I LIKE Bill Cunningham and his insightful stories. ARRRGGGHHHHH !!! Now what do we get? BLIPVERTS is right. I hope those executives explode.
-Frustrated with bad news in Los Angeles
Time to move to a new satellite provider.
Posted by: VIveMH at July 27, 2005 07:04 PM (MEq2d)
6
I think the newsworld international to be unique and necessary, especially to the American audience, who get only the news that American news channels consider not to be unpatriotic.
It is so refreshing to hear the perspective of other countries' views of world events.
For a long time I thought how much better Al Gore would have been as president. Now I think he should be put in a locked box with the key thrown away. Ruth Beazer
Posted by: Ruth Beazer at July 29, 2005 01:52 PM (/J7eQ)
7
I paid extra to receive NWI on Comcast cable. Now, at least I can reduce my cable bill. Maybe I wasn't giving current.tv a chance, but after a week of some of the most banal programming I'd ever seen, I just wonder if it wasn't a way of limiting what news the American public gets. I'm disappointed in Al Gore.
Posted by: Steve at August 08, 2005 01:00 PM (6CYRN)
Posted by: Dido at September 01, 2011 02:23 PM (O9TZG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
89kb generated in CPU 0.0586, elapsed 0.4864 seconds.
53 queries taking 0.471 seconds, 184 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.