May 13, 2004
Nick Berg traffic surge for some bloggers
Some bloggers are
experiencing traffic surges, thanks to the continued uproar (in the blogosphere, at least) over the cold-blooded murder of American Nick Berg by terrorists in Iraq.
I’ve never seen anything like the deluge that’s hit from the Nick Berg tragedy. I went from averaging 4,000 or so unique daily visits (as calculated by SiteMeter) to over 11,000 yesterday, starting with a huge surge around 9 last night. For some reason, this OTB post is the #2 result on Google for “Nick Berg.” I’ve had over 22,000 today and it’s not even 7 a.m.
Apparently, this spike is widespread. Jeff Quinton is getting so much traffic that heÂ’s worried about his bill for excess bandwidth charges. If you can help him out, please do. Kevin Aylward, which has a direct link to the video, is experiencing so much traffic that heÂ’s experiencing technical problems with the site. Kate McMillan is getting a ton of referrals and didnÂ’t even mention Berg by name in her post.
And as James at
OTB says, he's not alone. It seems that since the mainstream media appears to be trying to ignore this vital story, Americans and citizens all over the world are looking online for more information about Nick Berg's violent death and the predators who summarily executed him.
Posted by: mhking at
06:24 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 228 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I've gotten about 400 hits in the last 2 days from Google. Mostly people searching for phrases like "Al-ansar forum+beheading" or "Islamic forum", and they're all going to an article i wrote about a month ago about the bombings in Spain.
Posted by: Tom Alday at May 13, 2004 06:49 AM (0yANg)
2
I truly hope and pray that the visitors looking for news on Mr. Berg will notice one or two of the other stories on the respective websites (such as the UN oil-for-cash scandal, or the press conference of Kerry's former shipmates). Maybe the average American can be awoken.
Posted by: Rabbit at May 13, 2004 07:11 AM (XSi5N)
3
Once again, when the media drops the ball, the internet 'steps in' to take up the slack.
I think in twenty years we'll look back and see that while we were busy trying to bring democracy to the middle east, in a way we were also bringing it back to ourselves. The media oligarchies are doomed.
Posted by: Tom at May 13, 2004 07:40 AM (0fbLW)
4
Indeed.
We're looking at an overall revolution in the way of journalism; the closest you might find in traditional media is the sort of personal reporting you found from Edison Carter in the old
Max Headroom series.
Posted by: mhking at May 13, 2004 06:09 PM (ocC0S)
5
I'm very confused as to why the first audible screams on the video do not seem to match mouth movements of anyone on the video. It seems fishy.
Posted by: Mike Diaz at May 17, 2004 10:21 AM (My8fB)
Posted by: chi outlet at December 06, 2010 12:23 AM (4t7W4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 12, 2004
G4techTV is coming, but are we ready for it?
More info is starting to come out about what will emerge from the ashes of Comcast's purchase of TechTV.
As most folks know by now, the entire staff of TechTV was given a 60-day notice last week, that they all would lose their jobs. Inside word says that there will be a skeleton news staff remaining in San Francisco, while the bulk of production will move to G4's facilities in Los Angeles.
The new network will be called G4techTV, and will go live on 5/28.
The existing TechTV and G4 networks have a number of programs that will migrate to the new network -- shows like The Screen Savers, Fresh Gear, Robot Wars & Unscrewed from TechTV (no Call for Help on the list! [sniff!]); Cheat!, Cinematech, Portal, Judgement Day and others from G4.
The networks are each giving viewers a taste of some of the other network's programming this week and next; at 5P & 10P ET on TechTV; 4P & 11P ET on G4. A variety of programs are being shown so you can get a sample of what is going to show up on the new network.
I'm hopeful, but not optimistic. I'll give it a chance though -- the inner geek in me demands it.
Posted by: mhking at
05:51 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 227 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Nooooooooooooooooo! Save Morgan Webb!!!!!!
Posted by: Rabbit at May 13, 2004 03:32 AM (XSi5N)
2
Tech TV has been falling off lately, so I've been watching G4 a lot more. However, there's so little original programming between the two networks that it should work out.
But yes......Morgan Webb must stay!
Posted by: Stone at May 13, 2004 12:28 PM (FWis6)
Posted by: chi outlet at December 06, 2010 12:23 AM (4t7W4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
"Oh, well, move on to something else."
The World Wildlife Fund (I still haven't forgiven them for swiping WWF from WWE)
swears up and down that there will be no more cod left on earth within 15 years.
"Overfishing of cod continues because fisheries policies are driven by short-term economic interests," said Scott Burns, director of WWF's Marine Conservation Program. "In several areas, like the North Sea and the Barents Sea, scientists are calling for lower fish quotas and cod fishing bans, but they are ignored, and business carries on as usual. The onus is on Russia and Norway to prevent the Barents Sea cod stock from suffering a similar fate to that of the North American cod stock which imploded in the 1990s and has not recovered yet."
My oldest daughter, the high schooler, didn't miss a beat:
"Oh, well, move on to something else that tastes good!"
Posted by: mhking at
02:27 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 155 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ironically, I haven't forgiven the now-WWE for swiping the term "wrestling" from the most difficult sport ever, and making people think of real wrestling as faux-sports entertainment.
Posted by: Loweeel at May 12, 2004 08:22 PM (9W1GW)
2
Now, this is true too...[g] (speaking as someone who grew up watching the true old school wrestling (Dick the Bruiser, The Crusher, Sailor Art Thomas, et.al.)...
Posted by: mhking at May 13, 2004 01:59 AM (ocC0S)
Posted by: chi outlet at December 06, 2010 12:23 AM (4t7W4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Blogger still sucks

I see BlogSpot picked Monday (the day I also picked to finally divorce myself from them) as the day to launch their
"newer, friendlier" Blogger interface.
'Course, no matter how you dress it (and how pretty it looks), under the hood, it's still BlogSpot.
I'm still looking for a decent "BlogSpot Free" button for my button bar on the left rail... If you know of any, let me know.
Posted by: mhking at
06:37 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 75 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I ran across one months ago and can't remember where I saw it. And you're right. No matter how Blogspot dresses up, it's still Blogspot. I have a new domain name (lashawnbarber.net) set up with hosting, and I'm just waiting for Movable Type to set me up!
Posted by: La Shawn Barber at May 12, 2004 10:04 AM (Qa+f/)
2
Speaking on behalf of bloggers still using blogspot, you ain't missing a thing.
The newer, better, etc, etc, hosed my comments for several days. They now offer separate pages for archives, but if you do, it's not backwards compatable with 3rd party post comments providers.
They also now offer blogger-hosted comments. To experiment, I turned them on. It inserted some HTML into my template, then gave me an error message saying it couldnt properly modify my template and giving me a chunk of HTML to insert into my template. Fortunately I'd backed up my template, as their attempts to modify it COMPLETELY hosed my blog.
Posted by: Beck at May 13, 2004 04:21 AM (fllfQ)
Posted by: Tom Alday at May 13, 2004 06:59 AM (0yANg)
4
http://www.aylwardfamily.com/content/rlbs.asp
left column
Posted by: Claire at May 13, 2004 10:26 AM (l1oyw)
5
Just be surfing around in net. I definitely fpund a very informal place with a lot of good stuff for everybody. I will
certainly visit your site again sometime. Really good work.
Posted by: Marlene Kira at November 22, 2004 10:48 PM (ZoLDW)
Posted by: chi outlet at December 06, 2010 12:23 AM (4t7W4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
MoveOn.org non-partisan? Since when!
Looks like Bubba is
lending his support to anti-Bush groups across the board.
He appeared at a fund-raising rally for MoveOn.org and Voices for Working Families yesterday in New York. You know the spiel: "Bush is evil. If you vote for John Kerry, you can get the evil Republicans out. Just donate "X" for these organizations doing yadda-yadda-yadda..."
Feh.
But the interesting thing that came out of it was that while MoveOn.org is working against the President's reelection bid, they are "non-partisan."
Groups like MoveOn, the Media Fund and America Coming Together have raised more than $25 million for advertisements that criticize Bush's policies. Republicans contend the groups are "shadow parties" created by Democratic supporters to raise soft money.Wes Boyd, a founder of MoveOn.org, said those accusations are unfounded and that what they are doing is legal.
"The Republican National Committee has been trying to intimidate opponents of the Bush agenda," said Boyd who maintains his group is nonpartisan. "Those charges are ridiculous."
Did I miss something somewhere?
Boyd is about as non-partisan as Al Franken's shoe. But of course, since ABC said it, it must be true, right?
Yeah. Right.
Posted by: mhking at
06:23 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 200 words, total size 2 kb.
1
In fairness to ABC, they are just relaying Boyd's claim, "...said Boyd who maintains his group is nonpartisan."
That's not to say that lots of media outlets haven't described MoveOn as nonpartisan.
Posted by: Pat Curley at May 14, 2004 11:46 AM (PJWdB)
Posted by: chi outlet at December 06, 2010 12:23 AM (4t7W4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 11, 2004
The evil that American media ignores
This is actually a double-edged sword.
CBS broke all sorts of taboos by showing the Iraqi prisoner torture/humiliation photos on 60 Minutes II, justifying it by saying that it was important to show because of what it represents.
Of course, they haven't and aren't going to show the murder of Nick Berg. They are too busy looking over their shoulders with the FCC's "decency club" held high over their heads.
But seriously, there's the principle of the thing. It's easy enough for them to bash the President and the Administration, but when it comes to showing how truly evil these animals are, they drop the ball. They're not concerned -- they still got to bash Bush.
Not to worry though; Say Anything has the video if you really feel the need to see how evil these animals are.
Posted by: mhking at
04:51 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.
1
All the media is corrupted, even if we get to see any data we will corrupt it.
We never seen what happened in vietnam or in irak or afganistan.
Both sides are the same, both sides kill human beings, no matter how "barbaric" may seem to the other part, both sides are murderers.
We´re all violent creatures.
Posted by: No one at May 12, 2004 07:58 PM (1buJo)
2
I'm sorry, but regardless of any percieved "corruption" - as you put it - does not give anyone the right to act as these predators have acted. And your attempt to shift blame is unconscionable.
Posted by: mhking at May 13, 2004 02:01 AM (ocC0S)
3
The media is not at fault here. The media is doing their job. They are reporting on issues citizens NEED to know. To say the media is corrupt is crap. Bush is trying to pass off Berg's death as some sort of martyr and blaming the press all along the way.
This death is George Bush's fault. Add that to thousands more innocent Iraqis who have been killed since invading Iraq.
It's sick to see what this world is coming to.
Posted by: Life Inertia at May 13, 2004 05:37 PM (kTY3J)
4
If the media is doing their jobs, then tell me why they very quickly shoved Nick Berg's murder off of the newspaper page, and replaced it with more accusations and sordid pictures. Tell me why it is so important to "get Bush" and his people -- so vastly important that a terroristic murder of an innocent man in Iraq gets ignored?
Oh, then you blame the President for Berg's murder? I didn't see George Bush holding a knife to that man's throat, did you? I didn't hear George Bush wailing "Allah Akbar" on that tape over Nick Berg's dying screams; did you?
You didn't see those things, but it negates your agenda to ignore the truth.
Sorry. That won't wash here.
Posted by: mhking at May 13, 2004 06:01 PM (ocC0S)
Posted by: chi outlet at December 06, 2010 12:23 AM (4t7W4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Which is worse? A few naughty pictures, or the videotaped beheading of a prisoner?
Nick Berg owned a business in suburban Philadelphia. His dad, his brother and his sister live in the Philadelphia area. He was a contractor who went to Iraq to help out in the rebuilding of the infrastructure of that war-torn nation.
Nick Berg's face was seen today on a web-site known to belong to Al Qaeda. Berg was sitting in front of a group of masked thugs, who forced him to give his name, then promptly decapitated him.
And we're stuck listening to whining and crying about Iraqis being humiliated.
Perky Katie Couric keeps trying to tell us how evil the Bush Administration is every morning; Snotty Peter Jennings makes sure you know the same thing as you eat dinner each evening.
Nancy Pelosi screeches the same thing with all the presence of a mynah bird. John "Ketchup Boy" Kerry fusses about it -- at least between sessions of bitching about how pundits, commentators and other politicians need to leave his wife alone (when I hear Ketchup Boy try to play tough, I keep seeing Robert Conrad from the old Eveready commercials -- you remember the ones, with the battery on his shoulder, daring you to knock it off).
But none of them will reserve the same level or intensity of anger for Nick Berg's life.
Oh, we'll hear Al Franken and Whoopi Goldberg make light of Berg's death all over the place; we'll see postings from Democratic Underground and retardedly scrawled cartoons from Ted Rall insist that Berg deserved what he got because he worked for "eeeeevil" Halliburton or some other defense contracting firm -- after all, if he's associated with the defense industry in any way, shape or form, he's gotta be evil too, right?
My God, a man's life was taken by barbaric animals! Animals who have no concept of the meaning of the words "honor" or "integrity." No idea what "freedom" really means. "Truth" and "justice" are just some misbegotten notion to them.
And we're left with people like Jesse Jackson insisting that since a few prisoners in custody were harassed by their jailers that we are all of a sudden worse than the cretins who took Nick Berg's life.
Hand-wringers like Tom Daschle will show up on the Sunday morning talking head shows to try to tell us that we deserve anything we get, because we, as a nation, didn't do what the United Nations wanted us to do; because we didn't do what the Democrats on the Hill and across the nation wanted us to do.
What do you say to Nick Berg's family? Huh?
Oh, I know -- you'll want to lay the blame for his death at President Bush's feet.
Never one to place blame where it truly lies.
President Bush didn't stand over Nick Berg with a mask on. Donald Rumsfeld didn't raise a large knife over Berg's head and cut it off -- mind you, yelling "Allah Akbar" in the process. The Republican Party didn't plaster this on their web site, claiming that this fate awaited all other Americans.
But the liberals in this nation are going to place the blame squarely at the feet of those of us on the conservative side of the fence. "If we hadn't gone to war in the first place, none of this would have happened," is what they'll say.
If we hadn't gone to war, would Washington or New York or Los Angeles be a smoking crater right now? Huh?
A new CNN survey touted on the news this morning, indicates that more than 50% of Americans believe that the Iraqi war was not "worth it." How many more Americans' deaths will it take before it becomes worth it?
To hear John Kerry tell it, we would do better to pick up our toys and go home; a veritable modern-day Monroe Doctrine, if you will. Are you ready to wall off America from the rest of the world? Are you ready for the bad guys to come knocking on your door?
After all, the city council in Hamtrammack, MI has already given the OK for the Islamic Call to Prayer to be pronounced on loudspeakers in that sleepy little Detroit suburb. How much longer will it be before the city council in Hamtrammack "encourages" people to go to the mosque on a daily basis?
Bill Cosby unwittingly came up with the best analogy to this in his classic routine, Lights Out: "It's in your home state...[bump-bump, bump-bump]...It's outside your front door...[bump-bump, bump-bump]...and it's going to eat you up!"
You want to stop it now? Or wait until it's "outside your front door?" [bump-bump, bump-bump]
Posted by: mhking at
10:51 AM
| Comments (23)
| Add Comment
Post contains 795 words, total size 5 kb.
1
The chickenheart! Wah! I smeared jello all over the floor!
Posted by: Bruce at May 11, 2004 11:04 AM (+iTIZ)
2
"I set the sofa on fire -- 'YOU WON'T COME NEAR A SMOKING FIRE AND JELLO!'"
Posted by: mhking at May 11, 2004 11:11 AM (cLf53)
3
Does anyone know the website where this murder was shown?
Posted by: W at May 11, 2004 11:37 AM (2xGvq)
4
I'm not sure of the original site, but I know that a copy of the video is online at http://schnittshow.com/
Posted by: mhking at May 11, 2004 01:10 PM (ocC0S)
5
To make a war you need more than one side,
that side can represented by a country or religion or any kind of group, is all the same thing.
Both sides of this war share the very same blame about all bad, ugly & grotesque things that happened.
Take a very extrernal perspective, like some extraterrestrials came from outer space & see what is happening here, they will only see animals from the same specie killing each other. That´s it & nothing more, we like it & that´s why we will end life in this planet sooner or later.
Each one of us has the blame for every war ever.
We attach to a lifestyle, we got brainwashed by the concept of country, group or religion, we see ourselves as very pacefull creatures, but don´t realize how violent is the country state of mind that we have whitin ourselves.
Posted by: No one at May 12, 2004 07:54 PM (1buJo)
6
I'm sorry, but to use your logic, we hold the blame for 9/11. And as we all know, that's a load of hooey.
Posted by: mhking at May 13, 2004 02:03 AM (ocC0S)
7
ok um no we don't hold blame for 9/11 how could you possibly say it's our fault what the hell did we ever do? absolutely nothing i hate george bush and all this is his fault for having our troups there for no reason but 9/11 was not our fault i hope these 5 men are found and brutally beaten to death their lucky nick berg isn't related to me or my ass would be in iraq this second finding those 5 son of a bitches and murdering them with my bare fuckin hands >:O
Posted by: amber at May 13, 2004 01:12 PM (vdUBR)
8
And that would make you better than them Amber? How would retaliation help AT ALL at this point? All of this is retaliation after retaliation.
And FYI to anyone who listens remotely to news, 9/11 was our fault. We ignored warnings, we tuned out the rest of the world, because we're America, goddammit, and we're so much better than everyone else.(If you can't find the sarcasm, there is no use in saving you now.)
The Bush campaign is resurrecting McCarthyism, making blind threats at people and places (Weapons of Mass Destruction, taliban linking with iraq, etc.)and never providing hard, tangible proof to any of their claims.
Let the wool be pulled over your eyes.
Posted by: Life Inertia at May 13, 2004 05:48 PM (kTY3J)
9
I happen to believe that our govt. is most definitely to blame, at least partially. They keep harping on the fact that there are WOMD, but where are they? Sure, Sadam Hussein is where he belongs, but how many more innocent people have to die before the troops are pulled out? This man loses his life for what? When will it ever be enough for our Pres. administration? Unfortunately, i see nothing in sight but a whole lot of pain for our country. Look at us now. The men and women who have been placed in authority over our military are handing down orders for their subordinates to commit such heinous acts. Where are these people from? Are we sure they are Americans? How stupid can they be? What good did they believe they were doing? I'll tell you what they did, they have screwed us royally. That's what they've done, as if our honor wasn't already being drug through the mud, these men and women go and make things a great deal worse. I am so deeply saddened to know this about the people who are over there doing what is supposed to be bettering that country, instead, making it even more unsafe for people like me. I'd like to say to them, no thanks for the work you've done. As if things weren't hard enough, now it will take even longer for this nation of ours to regain it's respect and honor. To the parents of Nick Berg, my deepest sympathies. My prayers are with you.
Sincerely,
Misty
Posted by: Misty at May 13, 2004 05:53 PM (bgi/D)
10
Well let's be real here, first and foremost I would like to express great sympathy to Nick Berg's family for his tragic death, may God bless them and keep them sane. But one thing is that Nick was offered to go back to the United States and he refused, he should've known there was possibilities of dangers that he could have faced just by being in the area, he had no business there in the first place but he didn't deserve to die. Another thing, TWO WRONGS does not make a
RIGHT, US soldiers had no business doing what they did to Iraqi prisoners they made America look relly BAD! Just because of what terrorist does, does not mean we have to do it too. They'll do it to their own people so you know they don't care to do it to us. That's why we as Americans have to look beyond the Get- Back as far as torturing people, we have to fight back in a way that was well worth it all, no one is blaming President Bush I know I'm not, not for the death of Nick Berg, it was totally out of president Bush's hands so therefore I say, no one is blaming President Bush. But to speak so high and mighty about President Bush, I think not, now let's get on that, how the hell you goin blow something up then spend millions and billions of to fix it back up, in IRAQ in anyway, let's be REAL here, when over here in AMERICA you got homeless people, nowhere to live, nothing to eat or drink and you got children who's wanting to make something out of themselves by going to college, learning new things, exploring new worlds but of course they can't, you wanna know why, they can't afford it, so instead they'll hang on the street corners and sell drugs to make money to go to college, but before you know it, it's too late BANG there dead. So the money that he's putting into Iraq, don't you think we can definitly use it here in America? So what I do think about President Bush on that note, Bush ain't SHIT!!! Get his ass out FAST.
Posted by: TJM at May 13, 2004 05:54 PM (5Z442)
11
Oh, sure. Blame 9/11 on the US. Those 3,000 people were killed by the US. [rolling eyes]
Please. Spare me. The predators that flew those planes into those buildings for the sake of their bizarre impression of God are who killed those people.
And you are welcome to stick your head in the sand while Islamists who have the sole desire that you and me and every other American simply die at their hands to appease their evil perversion of God smile and continue to do their works; killing people as indiscriminately as possible.
You, like the prior poster, obviously have a visceral hatred of George W. Bush. Most likely, you cannot tell me -- truly -- why you hate the man, other than delivering some emotionally-charged diatribe with notions of the war and whether or not it was just/right/based on lies. Never mind that the hatred was there prior to the war; never mind that you can't get past the entire notion of using that man to personify your hatred for conservatism.
You want to hate those of us who are conservative, that's fine. But don't you dare sully the memories of those men and women whose lives were snuffed out on 9/11 by trying to divert blame away from the true villians of radical Islam, and their evil intentions.
Posted by: mhking at May 13, 2004 05:57 PM (ocC0S)
12
Hehheh, we still cannot accept is our faul isn´t it?
That microwave, the latest DVD player, a nice car,
we think that comes only from hard work?
Is necesary in order to have those posessions that a many other poor people exists in the world.
Our selfishness among so many other things (like transfering the blame to another entity such as the government or leaders (they are merely mirrors from us, they reflect exactly who we are & we still as inmature that we are won´t ever accept it).
War is the individual, we are the war.
Violence is not only putting bombs or shooting someone.
Violence is also taking a flag, accepting the belonging to a particular group, religion or country.
To keep a expensive status quo obviosly a powerfull country needs war if not war explotation of its neighbour countries or in a smaller scale, the guy who owns the company & has his slaves who have to have determinate looks & manners to work there.
We are so proud, & that arrogance is going to lead us to the end of human race.
Remember tha tale of the egg & the chicken?
Who was first?
Who drop the first bomb?
Who made bad to the other one first? The palestinian or the israeli?
Well, we will never know for sure, but we know both sides can kill.
I wonder if one day, a palestine will woke up & realize nothing of that really exists (palestinian state) same with a israeli person.
Then they will see their faces & see a mirror instead, slowly, no diplomats no external aid to solve a basic misunderstanding wich leaded to war.
That palestine & israeli can get married one day, havig children who will teach the next generations about their BIG BIG BIG misrake of following their ancestors erros.
They´ll learn that nationalism & patriotism leaded them to misery, at the end they didn´t even knew why was the war.
Posted by: No one at May 13, 2004 07:09 PM (1buJo)
13
I am an American soldier. I am proud to be one. I am proud to be American. I am proud of George Bush. None of you can say shit about Bush until you've been over to the Middle-East and see it with your own eyes. God Bless America. Bush in 2004.
Posted by: An American at May 13, 2004 08:00 PM (SUHnk)
14
Is necesary in order to have those posessions that a many other poor people exists in the world.Well, it's official. You're clueless.
Here's a quarter. Go buy yourself a clue.
Posted by: mhking at May 14, 2004 01:56 AM (ocC0S)
15
I think your question is bias "a few naughty pictures" these people werent posing for a porn magazine, they were violated and humiliated...now infront of the entire world. Obviously most people do not understand how conservative people in the middle east are, people dont walk around half naked, so to take pictures like that, and to pose them in homosexual positions is just , to me...utterly disgusting. The beheading of the man? Ask any of those prisioners i'm sure they would have rather have be beheaded than face the torture and humiliation that was so unhumanely bestowed on them. 9/11? I find it interesting that 9/11 is always brought into the issue of the Iraq war. They didn't have anything to do with it?
9/11 was a tragedy, but I wouldnt say that the United States did nothing to cause it. US FOREIGN POLICY. OH! and while your at it, check what the United States and Britan have done to the Middle east in the past..you might find a reason to why they are so "pissed off".
Posted by: differentopinion at May 14, 2004 08:39 PM (s6c4t)
16
I believe that the Iraqi's are to blame for all this they possibly cannot believe their way of life was better with so damn insane in charge. He committed worse crimes against his own people.
Posted by: jeanne at May 15, 2004 07:01 AM (Ee+dM)
17
i know the wrold think that muslim kill nick berg but realitty is muslim never kills inocent it is agaisnt the law of islam it is aganst the law of wrold and humanity
Posted by: ishaque at May 15, 2004 05:00 PM (pqqlU)
18
Tell that to all the innocent people who have died over the past couple of years, thanks to these predators' perverted view of God. If these morons wouldn't kill innocents, the New York skyline would still include the Twin Towers. Don't tell me about "realitty".
Posted by: mhking at May 15, 2004 05:13 PM (fj7gZ)
19
This is total bull. America should just say screw it with this pacivist bull and go do someting about what just happened. We need Reagan back i office cause he knew exactly what the hell he was doing. I think we should go over to Iraq, put a shotgun barell up all thier asses and pull the trigger. Teach them to mess with us. At least when Reagan was around in office no one fucked with us and we were a bad ass country.Now people look at us as if we are a bunch of push overs you can throw rocks at and win a war.
Posted by: who gives a fuck at May 15, 2004 10:41 PM (koiXe)
20
Please don't put words in my mouth. I blame
ISLAMISTS -- in other words RADICAL MUSLIMS for the ills that we are dealing with here. This does not mean that all Muslims are bad. But at the same time, this does not give "all Muslims" the power, nor necessity to attempt to subjuage, judge and act as executioner to Americans for their own pleasure or aggrandizement or "God-appeasement."
Posted by: mhking at May 16, 2004 01:30 AM (fj7gZ)
21
Dear Barry.. Give me some credits here.. I wouldnt lie and then expose myself that easily..Yes i am American and I am a muslim, and by nation i meant the nation of Islam regardless of being iraqi or not..
And about Nabil, His family got the corpse, and in the hospital, they were informed of what just happened..
You see, its very easy for us to judge and claim we know it all, by just sitting in our own houses watching TV, or discussing it with our friends..
I talk from my own experience living there and living in other "doomed" places..
Its not like that..
All I have to say .
Posted by: Mary at May 16, 2004 07:28 PM (vMgNI)
22
NOT CELEBRATE?
My ass. How dare the Olympic Committee suggest the American and English athletes not run around after one of their many wins and celebrate by wrapping themselves in the stars and stripes or the Union Jack. "It might offend other countries who may already have strained views of us". Bullshit. After our athletes win, they should grab Old Glory or the Jack and shove it in their faces chanting USA, USA, USA or England, England, England. France isn't being asked not to celebrate. Germany's not being asked to celebrate. Canada, Australia or Japan aren't being asked not to celebrate. Only our two countries. Can someone say "discrimination" or "jealousy"? They just don't want to have to listen to our national anthems over and over and over again. And I'll guarantee you this. The mass majority of the people in the stadium will boo till their horse when the Star Spangled Banner is played. Right then our athletes should collectively raise their right arms and flip them off. Or in England's case, give them the 'ol two finger salute. But then we'd just be criticized for "unsportsman like conduct". Oh well.
Posted by: The Amazing Mohammed at May 28, 2004 11:51 AM (2xQSr)
Posted by: chi outlet at December 06, 2010 12:24 AM (4t7W4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Iraqis get Saddam by 7/1; televised execution on 7/2??

The head of Iraq's war crimes tribunal says that the US
has pledged to hand over Saddam Hussain along with about 100 other criminals by June 30. That is the same day that soverignty would be returned to an Iraqi government by the United States.
Salem Chalabi told reporters that trials would begin early next year, and that judges would receive "files" on the suspects at the end of this year.Chalabi is in Kuwait to collect evidence against the suspects.
My question (and I'm sure everyone elses as well)... "What time is Saddam's execution scheduled for on 7/2, and will there be pay-per-view?"
Posted by: mhking at
07:00 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 120 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Actually my question is: When we feed Saddam in to the industrial grade shredder, should it be feet first or head first?
Posted by: Tman at May 11, 2004 09:13 AM (Fho+X)
Posted by: chi outlet at December 06, 2010 12:24 AM (4t7W4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
"FUKUI-SAN!" -- "Go ahead, big guy!"
"Iron Blogger Republican
has opened with a skewering of Pelosi, peppered with a light comparison to Leona Helmsley and a strong hint of Rumsfeld's defense!
"Also, from the Challenger's side, several dishes with a deeper history than Iraq are begun, capped off by a question of whether or not the US will win the war at all!
"Back to you...."
"Thanks, Ohta! The opening volleys in Battle Rumsfeld are complete! The Iron Blogger Republican and the Challenger have until midnight tonight to give rebuttals to the opening posts!
"You can join in and comment on both sides as we continue on Iron Blog! We'll be right back!"
Posted by: mhking at
02:19 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: The Chairman at May 11, 2004 02:26 AM (Jq9KY)
2
Oh my. That is hysterical - and hubby-head and I are Iron Chef fans... thanks for the link!
Posted by: songstress7 at May 11, 2004 08:08 PM (95fiz)
Posted by: chi outlet at December 06, 2010 12:24 AM (4t7W4)
4
This article is very interesting, I like it. I will always come to visit after.I would recommend to friends more. mbt shoes Collection in MBT Kisumu Sandals, MBT Sport Shoes, MBT Shuguli GTX and MBT Fanaka GTX Shoes and so on. They are very popular in USA, UK, Canada, mbt walking shoesAustralia, France, Germany, discount mbt shoesSwiss and now China. You will never worry about how to go with your, because they collect all the colors in Beige, Cream, slide bearing,Coffee, Chocolate, Blue, Birch, Chili and Pink, White, Black, Red, Silver and Grey just like the Rainbow.
Posted by: nkflh at January 14, 2011 01:55 AM (vUk95)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 10, 2004
Yes, Democrats DO take black folks for granted
Finally, some liberal blacks are starting to see what I've been trying to say for the longest time: that the Democratic Party takes black America
for granted.
"They really don't care about us," said Delegate Tony E. Fulton, Baltimore Democrat. "We are used every four years, then thrown back."
"The Democratic Party acts as if they own black people," said Delegate Clarence "Tiger" Davis, Baltimore Democrat. "The state party is racist to the core."
Another insult, said Delegate Nathaniel T. Oaks, Baltimore Democrat, is that party leaders press black candidates more than white candidates to vote for tax increases, which could cause them to lose their seats in coming elections.
"I think the Democratic Party takes black people for granted," Mr. Oaks said. "I think what [the Democratic Party] does in the state is just a reflection of what it does as a whole on the national level."
Unfortunately, most folks who begin to recognize this fact are reluctant to even take a second (or for most a first) glance at the Republican or Libertarian parties, opting instead
not to vote at all.
I wish more would take to heart what one of the more liberal black legislators (US Rep. Charles Rangel, D-NY) said; that black America as a whole would gain much more political power once a true two-party dialog asserts itself.
Posted by: mhking at
04:30 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 235 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Dude said "I think"? Hahaaaaa!! What a riot.....alright, up offa the floor. Wow, I thought the state of Maryland was not much different from Mass., NY, or Cali. Aint nuthin like Florida.....republicans run this state. Quite well, I might add.
And just where does my brotha think he's goin? To conservatism? The Republican Party? Where you gots to BRING IT!!???
Gotta come HARD with everything that lies behind "whatever" skin color, performing at one's highest possible a high level and being solely responsible for your success (or failure)???
Good.........back to how we did it PRE Great Society of the mid 1960s. And BTW, great friggin idea, President Einstein, err, Johnson. "Negro can't stand on his own 2 feet, we will hold 'im up." Yippee.
Posted by: Beau at May 11, 2004 03:01 AM (GpmN8)
2
I wish more would take to heart what one of the more liberal black legislators (US Rep. Charles Rangel, D-NY) said; that black America as a whole would gain much more political power once a true two-party dialog asserts itself.
One of a very few things from Rep. Rangel that I agree with.
Posted by: McGehee at May 11, 2004 03:52 AM (lGoQn)
3
Of course, I don't think that Charlie Rengel was saying that the Republican party needs more people like J.C. Watts, but that it needs to be not so doggone conservative so it'll attract more people like Charlie Rengel.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 11, 2004 01:26 PM (NgWVQ)
4
I must take on the fact that i in truth look up to the way your publish posts. The details were made to the point and genuinely makes a joy to read. Wish all bloggers and publishers can save article as you. Keep up the good work.
Regards,
SEO Services UK
Posted by: Dominique at September 21, 2011 02:19 AM (OG4Mi)
5
I'm not sure why but this website is loading very slow for me. Is anyone else having this issue or is it a issue on my end? Any help would be appreciated.
Posted by: SriLankan Airlines at September 23, 2011 04:28 AM (OG4Mi)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
What the--!!??

Am I the only one who's seen commercials for the
upcoming MGM movie,
Soul Plane and asked, what the hell is that?!?
The description of the movie leaves my jaw hanging down to my keyboard.
Why just fly when you can soar with soul? After a humiliating experience on an airplane, Nashawn Wade sues the airline and is awarded a huge settlement. Determined to make good with the money, Nashawn creates the full service airline of his dreams, complete with sexy stewardesses, funky music, a hot onboard dance clud, and a bathroom attendant. Departing from all-new Terminal X in Los Angeles, Soul Plane gives "fly" a whole new meaning taking it's passengers on a maiden voyage full of comedy.
Insult my intelligence, integrity, and honor all at once, why don't they?
This sounds and looks like what my father would call a "waste of good electricity."
Posted by: mhking at
03:11 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 148 words, total size 1 kb.
1
.. sorry, man.. but, I agree with your Father.... a waste of electricity... I'd give it a miss...
Posted by: Eric at May 10, 2004 03:54 PM (Py0cM)
2
As singularly unappealing as this movie looks like, it really pales in comparison to White Girls. Oh thank heaven the less-talented Wayans brothers still get work.
Posted by: frinklin at May 10, 2004 04:13 PM (6+H+U)
3
The preview reminds of those old movies from the 30s and 40s with black actors looking bug-eyed, shuffling and asking each other "Sho' nuff?"
Posted by: La Shawn Barber at May 11, 2004 09:59 AM (Qa+f/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Crossing over for most blacks is a matter of discovery

Willie Talton, chief deputy of Houston County in Middle Georgia, is unopposed in his run for the Georgia House as a Republican. |
Most blacks who leave the Democratic plantation and vote Republican do so
after they finally get sick and tired of their treatment overall.
"I have voted for lots of Democrats," says 60 year old Willie L. Talton, of Warner Robins, chief deputy sheriff of Houston County. "But in the last two or three years, I have been an independent voter. And as you start voting, you start learning things. I realized all of the candidates I was voting for were Republicans, so I started watching them and I started attending meetings. It seemed like it was the party of opportunities and very family-oriented. That attracted me."
In January, Talton will be sworn as a black Republican member of the Georgia House of Representatives.
Other black Republican candidates are looking to join Talton, like 30 year-old Nick Chester of Mableton (a friend of mine who lives nearby).
"I wish I could tell you that being a black Republican for me was some sort of epic adventure, but the truth is, it is not," says Chester, the son of a career military family who spent eight years in the military himself before settling with his wife, Donna, in Cobb."Most African-Americans are naturally conservatives," he says. "I believe in smaller, more efficient government and I believe in the traditional family as defined as one man and one woman. I am a Bible-based Christian . . . I trust that the people, when given the opportunity, make the best decisions, not the government."
"I often tell my African-American friends that we believe in the same things, except I belong to the party that cares about those things," says Chester, who is running in House District 33 against white incumbent Democrat Don Wix. The district is 31 percent black with a Republican base of about 43 percent.
Both Chester and Talton have found that blacks, as a whole, do not bolt from one party to another. The process is far more gradual. One of discovery. One which happens when an individual realizes that his core values are more in tune with conservatives than with liberals.
Posted by: mhking at
03:01 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 388 words, total size 3 kb.
1
A-men! I still can't figure out what's so surprising about us being conservative - the few that can proudly say so.
Grew up in a regular family with strong morals & virtues, regularly went to church, got good grades while growing up in in a regular mixed neighborhood (don't tell me bout "diversity' - it's old), had a regular childhood doin regular sh......never mind. You get the point.
Basic stuff that all normal Americans can relate to............and Star Parker puts it best, "That's conservatism, folks, plain & simple".
But, I guess everyone has their price - aint that right white libs?
Posted by: Beau at May 11, 2004 03:14 AM (GpmN8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 09, 2004
Jesse Jackson looking for more face time; this time in Europe

As if this would surprise anyone, Jesse Jackson
has now called for the withdrawl of troops from Iraq.
The Gypsy appeared this weekend at a conference in Greece, where he made a number of statements critical of the Bush Administration's handling of the Iraq War.
During the opening session of a conference on religions and cultures in Greece, Jackson said Bush must “end the occupation of Iraq and return sovereignty to the Iraqis as quickly as possible in cooperation with the United Nations and Europe.”“The US bias toward Israel and its support for (Ariel) Sharon’s aggressive policies have obstructed peace and triggered violence and hate in the region,” he said.
Of course when the cameras went off in Greece, he hotfooted it back to this country, just in time to make it to the Million Mom March in Washington today.
Leave it to Jesse to grab an international spotlight when he can't get a domestic one.
Posted by: mhking at
06:38 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 177 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The Gypsy! LMFAO!!!!!!!! Need to clean my monitor now
Posted by: tasha at December 05, 2004 06:27 PM (ZhvMb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
More black & Hispanic kids fall out of buildings; in other news, Sky is blue
From Sunday's
New York Newsday:
Minority children are more likely to be hurt in falls from buildings than white children, according to a study by researchers at Columbia University Medical Center.Young Latino and black children were twice as likely to be seriously hurt in a fall from a building than white children, the study found.
It also found that children in low-income ZIP codes were more likely than those in more affluent neighborhoods to suffer injuries in a fall from a building.
Those evil buildings; it's the bricks in 'em! The bricks hate minorities!
I'd better not say that too loud, the Soul Patrol may pick up on that and try to use it for real!
Posted by: mhking at
11:18 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 146 words, total size 1 kb.
1
If I was living with small children in a multi-story building that had windows without screens, and the building management would not provide screens, I would go to the hardware store and buy a hammer, nails and a roll of wire. Then I would drive nails about 5 inches apart into the wall around the lower halves of the windows and weave wire back & forth and then up and down to make screens. When I moved out, the nails could be pulled out and the small holes spackled over.
Posted by: N. Beckmann at May 09, 2004 12:59 PM (0GNJF)
2
"Young Latino and black children were twice as likely to be seriously hurt in a fall from a building than white children, the study found."
Hmmm, maybe white men can't jump, but they bounce better?
Posted by: Pat Curley at May 09, 2004 05:21 PM (XQEqy)
3
Right, right......and if Grandma had "whatever", she'd be Grandpa.
Luuuuv that intellectual stimulation.
Posted by: Beau at May 10, 2004 04:28 AM (GpmN8)
4
What a stupid thing to study!
Posted by: La Shawn Barber at May 10, 2004 08:20 AM (Qa+f/)
5
They got funding for this? I must be doing something wrong in my career.
Posted by: maura at May 10, 2004 04:44 PM (OO/sE)
6
Lets have a funded study of why boogers get hard over time. It is equally important.
Posted by: tasha at December 05, 2004 06:29 PM (ZhvMb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Queer Eye for the Troy Guy? Uh, no.

Actor Brad Pitt
says that he thinks fashion conscious men (read "metrosexuals") will wear Greek-style skirts after his new movie,
Troy hits theaters next weekend.
At a recent press conference hyping the flick, Pitt was asked about appearing as the nearly naked Achilles.
``I'm naked all the time at home.''``Men will be wearing skirts by next summer. That's my prediction and proclamation,'' he said with a laugh. ``The film answers to both genders. We were going for realism and Greeks wore skirts all the time then.''
Think about this -- waltzing through Lenox Square Mall here in Atlanta, only to be passed by some metrosexual parading down the mall in his Greek
Troy skirt. Ostensibly to be ogled at, not by some winsome lass admiring his legs, but by some guy admiring other stuff.
No, I figure this trend is reserved for the Queer Eye set. (Can you imagine a 350 pound denizen of far north Georgia making the trip down just to get his Troy skirt?
Just damn. Now I need Draino to get that image outta my mind.
Posted by: mhking at
11:03 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 195 words, total size 1 kb.
1
LOL... that's a particularly frightening mental image, thanks very much for subjecting me to it. Off to claw out my eyeballs.
Posted by: songstress7 at May 09, 2004 07:01 PM (95fiz)
2
I saw a guy yesterday wearing a skirt. He was an older guy riding a motorcycle with a woman and a beer belly. He wasn't actually riding it but walking around with his helmet. There's no way I can wear one and if by some bizarre circumstance I did I sure wouldn't ride a motorcycle. What happens when you get on the freeway? Does it fly up and cover your face? You could cause accidents that way.
Posted by: Keith at May 09, 2004 07:52 PM (DrZwK)
3
Three observations:
1. Brad Pitt's in the latest Vanity Fair not wearing much, but his charm is gone.
2. Men don't look good in skirts.
3. If The Husband would wear a kilt/skirt/whatever. I'd leave him.
Posted by: Fausta at May 10, 2004 04:35 AM (WhoVr)
4
Aw hell naw. NNNNo!! Brad, Mr. Aniston, you need a checkup - from the neck up.
Lemme tell ya, when the lovely Juliette Huddy (sp) of Fox & Friends Weekend showed us Metrosexual cats luuv - those fashion conscious dudes that can do it all around the house EXCEPT "take care" of man - she said NOTHING........about wearin dresses, skirts, or kilts.
NNNNuh-uh. Stictly manly & masculine, but very secure & not afraid to wear a pink dress shirt to woik. (work) Or lay down some oven cleaner, maybe even work the Singer sewin' machine when necessary.
Dang, Brad, show us some luv, dawg!! Ya messin' up a good name. Bad enough some of my sistas endearingly call me a white brotha, now I gotta be girly man just 'cause I know how to iron?
Wonderful.
Posted by: Beau at May 10, 2004 04:42 AM (GpmN8)
5
This is a great find, Micheal!
Just last week I blogged up something on the fact that the producers of Troy had to hire a leg double for Pitt because his calves were too scrawny to make him look like Achilles.
http://travellingshoes.blogspot.com/2004_04_25_travellingshoes_archive.html#108290993177603095
Posted by: H. D. Miller at May 10, 2004 06:55 PM (3ElvU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
"Pseudo-journalists?"
The media industry has been infested by the rise of pseudo-journalists who go against journalism's long tradition to serve the public with accurate information, Los Angeles Times Editor John S. Carroll told a packed room in the Gerlinger Lounge (at the University of Oregon) on Thursday.
Fascinating. Who're the "pseudo-journalists" he's going to excoriate?
Guess.
In a scathing critique of Fox News and some talk show hosts, such as Bill O'Reilly, Carroll said they were a "different breed of journalists" who misled their audience while claiming to inform them. He said they did not fit into the long legacy of journalists who got their facts right and respected and cared for their audiences.
Fair? Balanced? Nope, neither of those matter.
Remember? We're supposed to be the bad guys.
Part of the problem of the mainstream media with FNC is that Fox doesn't pretend to be impartial in the same way that many of them pretend to be.
Fox doesn't pretend that the rest of the field is as pure as the driven snow either. Fox dares to cross the line and let everyone else in on the joke: that most of the media are liberal, and that they (Fox) are only providing an alternative.
Does that make them evil "pseudo-journalists," to use Mr. Carroll's terminology?
Of course not! Fox is but an alternative -- and judging by the ratings, an alternative that a significant portion of America is interested in listening to.
It's too bad that Carroll and others like him are so wrapped up in their own self-flaggelation that they don't see that truth.
And if they don't see that; if they only want to report what they feel is "right and just," then the question becomes who actually are the "real" journalists and who are the rumor-mongering "pseudo-journalists?"
(Courtesy Wizbang & blogoSFERICS)
Posted by: mhking at
10:12 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 303 words, total size 2 kb.
1
We saw the coming attractions for "Troy" last night. I got news for Brad, a superhero he aint. He looked like Brad Pitt, movie star, all dressed up in a costume.
I hope he hasn't invested any money in the Greek clothing fad.
Posted by: erp at May 09, 2004 12:38 PM (UwHJN)
2
Actually, I think the sentence makes perfect sense if read this way: "The media industry has been infested by the rise of pseudo-journalists who go against journalism's long tradition [in order] to serve the public with accurate information."
It's nice that we have multiple voices to counter the blatant bias that is, apparently, part of journalisms "long tradition".
Posted by: Tisnot at May 09, 2004 04:42 PM (7Ikik)
3
Just as every newspaper has it's op-ed page, a cable news channel can have it's op-ed programs. I doubt that Bill O'Reilly thinks of himself as a "journalist" so much as an advocate. He has his opinions and presents them openly.
If John S. Carroll wants to call O'Reilly a journalist just to argue that he isn't a journalist, then I'm guessing that the whole arguement is less about journalism than about cleverly trying to discredit opinions that he doesn't like.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 09, 2004 07:35 PM (0Vz8o)
4
I watch all of the news outlets, but prefer Fox because it's the only one that doesn't tell me what I'm SUPPOSED to think. My God, what a concept!
Posted by: Julie at May 09, 2004 07:42 PM (0GNJF)
5
Like Rupert Murdock invented "Fair and Balanced".....gimme a break.
Those libs got fat, happy, INCREASINLY biased, and plain moronic - and now they are getting their heads kicked in....DAILY! By wider & wider margins!!
Ya gotta love it.
What liberals wouldn't be bitchin & moanin...oh, and blaming?? We all know how they operate - and that 's the problem.
Libs KNOW that people are catching on......check the voting trends in the last dozen or so years.
They can flash in the pan every now & then on election day, but intellectual "nothing" is hard to sustain. They - including their media - simply have no better alternatives.
Posted by: Beau at May 10, 2004 03:13 AM (GpmN8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 08, 2004
"Tell me your politics, and I'll tell you who you are..."

Ten days ago, a man's fantasy became reality in a form never before seen, Iron Blog, a giant debating battlefield.
The motivation for spending his fortune to create Iron Blog was to encounter new, original thought, which could be called true, artistic creations.
To realize his dream, he started choosing the top bloggers of various schools of thought. And he named his choices the Iron Bloggers, the invincible bloggers of debating skill.
Iron Blogger Democrat is Jay Bullock; Iron Blogger Green is R.G. "Robin" Pratt; Iron Blogger Libertarian is Vinod Valloppillil; and Rosemary Esmay is Iron Blogger Republican.
Iron Blog is the battlefield where the Iron Bloggers await the challenges of master bloggers from all over the blogosphere.
Both the Iron Blogger and the Challenger have twenty-four hours to first tackle the theme topic of the day. Using all their senses, skills and creativity, they're prepared to present intelligent arguements never heard before.
And if ever a challenger wins over the Iron Bloggers, he or she will gain the people's ovation and fame forever.
Every battle, reputations are on the line in the Iron Blog, where supreme debaters pit their skill against each other.
What inspiration will today's challenger bring, and how will the Iron Bloggers fight back?
The Heat Will Be On!
Posted by: mhking at
02:36 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 235 words, total size 2 kb.
1
An excellent rewrite. May we borrow this, with proper credit and linkage, of course?
Posted by: The Chairman at May 08, 2004 02:43 PM (Jq9KY)
2
Indeed, Chairman; I'd be honored!
Posted by: mhking at May 08, 2004 02:55 PM (25SN5)
Posted by: Watcher at May 08, 2004 06:01 PM (8Pbct)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Joe Biden is overstepping his bounds
US Senator Joe Biden (Moonbat-DE) may be
inviting a Zot from the Almighty in his zeal for getting to the Bush Administration over the Iraqi prisoner fiasco.
Once those people are identified, Biden said, Bush must "demand the resignations for whoever is involved in this policy, and that includes Lord God Almighty himself. It includes anybody involved."
I don't think anyone with any sense would want to be near the Senator anytime soon.
Posted by: mhking at
11:01 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 83 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Biden is an idiot. He
can't beleive in God if he says something as asinine as that.
Posted by: SpaceMonkey at May 08, 2004 02:18 PM (qSKHX)
2
...in other news today, God has announced his resignation as supreme being, in what many regard as knuckling under to pressure from the US Senate. "I thought I had everything under control. Things have been on the rebound ever since the whole 30 years war fiasco (for which France deserves the majority of the blame). But ever since this whole Iraqi prisoner debacle, I've realized that maybe free will wasn't such a good idea after all..."
Posted by: Beck at May 08, 2004 03:38 PM (fllfQ)
3
I've always kinda liked Joe and probably will tomorrow.
But, jeeze, what a stupid thing to say...
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 08, 2004 03:59 PM (QAscs)
4
Actually, a British politician said the same thing, first.
Posted by: Robert at May 08, 2004 04:14 PM (8RdYg)
5
Thank GOD for precedent....the party of Clinton conveniently forgets. Dontcha all love it?
Hell, I'll resign from my job when Billy Boy resigns his presidency............then my alarm clock went off.
Keep dreamin, Bud.
Posted by: Beau at May 10, 2004 07:44 AM (GpmN8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
If Rumsfeld is gone, don't count on a replacement anytime soon
Juliette
brings up a fascinating point about the confirmation process (or with this Administration,
lack of confirmation process) in the Senate.
If Rummy leaves, it ain't gonna be pretty.
Say Donald Rumsfeld resigns or is asked to do so. (Highly unlikely, I know. But humor me.) What are the chances of the US having a new SecDef confirmed by the senate between that hypothetical date and January 20, 2005?
And we thought the notion of a filibuster over judicial nominees was ugly?
Posted by: mhking at
09:28 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Rumsfeld doesn't look like a quitter to me, nor do I think his self esteem is formed by leftwing nutcases in a full court press to oust Bush.
Posted by: erp at May 09, 2004 02:30 AM (UwHJN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
104kb generated in CPU 0.0857, elapsed 0.1523 seconds.
59 queries taking 0.1112 seconds, 220 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.