May 08, 2004
Fox News suing over billboard at CNN Center

Fox News Channel has had an
ad on a billboard facing CNN Center & Centennial Park in downtown Atlanta for more than five years now (I remember it from when I worked at CNN). The billboard, at the corner of Marietta St. and Centennial Olympic Park Dr., has continuously had messages mocking CNN and encouraging CNN employees, and Atlanta locals alike to watch Fox News.
Most recently, the billboard has said "Come Home Connie. CNN Needs You." -- a reference to Connie Chung, whom CNN fired abruptly in March 2003, after her show, Connie Chung Tonight simply tanked. Even Ted Turner called her "awful."
FNC wants to put a new billboard in place of the current one: "Now That CNN's Ratings are Gone With the Wind, Our Work on This Board Is Done. We Love You Atlanta. Brought to you by your friends at FOX News Channel."
By itself, that doesn't sound any worse than any of the other billboards out there -- certainly not one to really get anyone's goat.
But the zinger comes below that text: "Sign Up with America's Newsroom! Forward resumes to resumes(at)foxnews.com."
Current notion is that CNN doesn't like that. Fox has accused CNN of putting pressure on the billboard company to prevent the new sign from going up.
In a letter obtained Thursday by The Associated Press, Fox lawyer Dianne Brandi suggests Atlanta company Camfaux LLC may have buckled to pressure from CNN not to put up the message."Should you choose not to put up the billboard immediately, we will consider all options available to us, including, of course, legal options," Brandi wrote.
Camfaux says that, yes, they owned the billboard in '99 when the Fox News Channel messages began going up, but that they've since sold the sign to Atlanta-based Boardworks Outdoor Advertising.
Boardworks is silent on the matter -- at least to the press.
Stay tuned -- the billboard is around the corner from my new client's office, as well as from my wife's office in downtown Atlanta. I'll see the message if and when it goes up.
Posted by: mhking at
03:26 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 361 words, total size 2 kb.
1
It's hard to believe that people still bother with CNN after they confessed to pretty much letting Saddam run their Baghdad bureau for years.
Posted by: Watcher at May 08, 2004 06:40 AM (G/Ew1)
2
Wasn't Ted Turner's first business billboards or something relating to them? I could be totally misremembering, but that'd be ironic.
[Pauses to whip out Google rather than look foolish...]
Why yes, I have a good frickin memory:
http://abcnews.go.com/reference/bios/turner.html
Posted by: Jay Solo at May 08, 2004 10:40 AM (eQAZU)
3
Hah!, I love this.
At first glance I thought the sign said.Come Home COMMIE.
CNN Needs you.FNC Probably felt enough people would see the similarity to forgo that one.
Posted by: SpaceMonkey at May 08, 2004 02:23 PM (qSKHX)
Posted by: Aaron's Rantblog at May 11, 2004 07:13 PM (UxMXb)
5
I'm visiting because we're both in the Watcher's competition.
It's a pity that journalists want to change the world. Just being an relatively honest broker is a tremendous achievement.
I'm really just an accidentally political blogger, but I have a post on billboards you might find interesting at http://beliefseekingunderstanding.blogspot.com/2004_05_01_beliefseekingunderstanding_archive.html#108395645285797925
Posted by: Douglas at May 11, 2004 08:43 PM (bFmrY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
'Pay What You Want' airfare? Where's Clark Howard?

German-based Hapag-Lloyd Express has
new service in the UK that -- believe it or not -- allows you to pay "what you want" for the fare.
It's a promotional gimmick, of course, but on the three-day Newcastle-Hanover sightseeing run last Sunday, cabin crew came down the aisle, and passengers literally got to pay what they wanted for the flight.
60 passengers took up Hapag-Lloyd on the offer.
The average fare paid by the passengers was £13 (US$ 23) on the run. The highest amount paid was £45 (US$ 80), while another paid only £1 (US$1.80) for the 1600 km (864 miles) roundtrip journey.
I wonder whether consumer guru (and notorious spend-thrift) Clark Howard was the one who paid £1 for his flight.
Posted by: mhking at
02:52 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 138 words, total size 1 kb.
May 07, 2004
Baseball fans 3, Spider-Man 2

Major League Baseball & Sony Pictures have
backed off of the previously announce plans to place logos for
Spider-Man 2 on bases, pitchers' rubbers and on-deck circles for all games played the weekend of June 11.
Sounds like saner heads prevailed.
The plan started to fall apart when the Yankees (Yeah, I hate 'em, but they are the paragon of traditionality) announced that the special bases would only be used during batting practice.
Add to that, the uproar from baseball purists, including former MLB Commissioner Fay Vincent, and the plan was kaput.
I understand marketing, having studied it enough in my years, but some things are better left alone.
Posted by: mhking at
02:20 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Nice new look for the blog, Michael!
Posted by: Fausta at May 07, 2004 04:21 AM (WhoVr)
2
Nice, clean design. I LIKE it!
Posted by: Sissy Willis at May 07, 2004 04:40 AM (3yHhC)
3
It looks nice around here.
Posted by: Donnah at May 07, 2004 06:51 AM (1q3hZ)
4
I am not sure how you could see that logo on the bases anyway, too small, either on TV or from the stands. They should just do an electronic thingy on TV.
Posted by: guy at May 07, 2004 09:48 AM (vd5L/)
5
Baseball fans: "How DARE you get money in any way other that screwing US over!"
Posted by: Dave Munger at May 07, 2004 01:27 PM (jLTpM)
6
I remember your blog from before, but lost the link......thanks to the vodkalanche, I find it again.
Great site Mr. King!
Keep it up!
Yet another added to me blogroll......
Posted by: Tman at May 07, 2004 02:01 PM (Fho+X)
7
I'm thankful the plan went kaput too,but I think it was Sony who came to their senses first. Having their movie attatched to this mess wasn't nearly worth the benefit.
Posted by: frinklin at May 07, 2004 09:39 PM (6+H+U)
8
I'm a Mets fan but I gotta respect the Yankees. A few years ago MLB had a "Turn the clock
ahead Day" where all the teams wore "futuristic" uniforms (the Mets were "The Mercury Mets" for a day).
Only the Yankees refused to participate; that day they wore the same ol' uniform they'd been wearing for 100 years and will be wearing in the "future".
Welcome to Munuvia, btw! This is my first visit and I love yer posts!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 08, 2004 09:20 AM (QAscs)
9
I remember those! For the most part, they were pretty hideous.
I may have to dig some photos up one of these days.
And thanks for the welcome! I'm settling in fairly nicely!
Posted by: mhking at May 08, 2004 09:30 AM (25SN5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Scare America misses payroll; Cohen resigns
From
Drudge:
In yet another sign of trouble for Air America Radio, the liberal talk network entering its fifth chaotic week on the air, co-founder and chairman Evan Cohen resigned Thursday, as did vice-chairman and investor Rex Sorensen.The CHICAGO TRIBUNE is planning to report in fresh editions: The company also failed to make its scheduled payroll, leaving its staff roughly 100 radio personalities, writers, and producers unpaid until Thursday.
Damn. I figured they'd at least make the summer.
I guess I won't win in the pool...
Posted by: mhking at
01:54 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 98 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Fantastic site. Loved your take on humiliating prisoners. Do you have an email address?
Posted by: erp at May 07, 2004 02:27 AM (7YpR4)
2
Try mhking@bellsouth.net
Posted by: mhking at May 07, 2004 03:10 AM (ccAai)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 06, 2004
"So-called Saddam" - or More lies from the moonbat fringe

US Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA), part of the radical moonbat sector of society, and one of the chief moonbats of the Congressional Black (Democratic & Liberal) Caucus,
appeared on Pacifica's (a whole den of moonbats if there ever were any)
Democracy Now radio program yesterday and had the audacity to infer that Saddam not only wasn't a bad person, but that he didn't even exist.
"Everywhere we go we seem to be creating a mess. We've created a mess in Iraq, and our soldiers are dying every day. Now we find that we are violating the prisoners. We're treating them worse than so-called Saddam had treated them."
"So-called?""So-called?" Did I miss something somewhere?
Congresscritter Waters actually seems to be implying that not only is the US military as a whole complicit in the Iraqi prisoner mess, but then goes as far as to imply that Saddam didn't exist, by way of her veiled statement.
In that same interview, Waters directly contravenes official US foreign policy by encouraging active rejection of the new government in Haiti. She suggests that she knows better what US foreign policy should be regarding Haiti, far better than the State Department, and far better than the White House.
As of this morning, I have 22 members who join with me in no recognition of this illegitimate Prime Minister. There have been no elections. He was supported essentially by the United States, with the support of France and Canada, to take over the post of Prime Minister after the coup d'etat, and I believe, as other members apparently believe, that he is illegitimate. He's but a puppet, and we should not recognize him.
No recognition of former leader Jean Bertrand Aristide's crimes; no recognition that Aristide was responsible for the sorry state that Haiti had fallen into in the first place.
With constant and continued crud like this, Waters has firmly cemented her spot as one of the most brainless moonbats on the Hill.
Posted by: mhking at
01:55 PM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 344 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Mr King - Congratulations on moving off Blowspot! Link has been updated.
Posted by: Denny at May 06, 2004 06:25 PM (lkBRT)
2
hi there, I just ran across your blog, you make a lot of sense. I plan to be back often.
Posted by: John Cunningham at May 06, 2004 09:07 PM (9GDbZ)
3
I'm glad someone has the balls to say it.
Posted by: Beck at May 07, 2004 12:30 AM (fllfQ)
4
Nice page, friend. Keep up the good work.
Posted by: Acidman at May 07, 2004 02:11 AM (PbJHn)
5
I love Democracy Now -- Amy Goodman is the funniest host on radio. Indeed, Air America missed a chance by not recruiting her. Of course she's far too interested in actual blood in the streets (she always gets this slightly creepy tone of cheerfulness when describing 'uprisings,' even when it's her side being slaughtered in Aceh) for the Democrat party...
I read somewhere yesterday, though, that her new book is being published by a
subsidary of Disney! I'm thrilled! Amy sells out!
Posted by: Michael Tinkler at May 07, 2004 02:51 AM (24tGv)
6
Aw mmmman!! Mike.....whatchu tryin to do, man? That big ole Maxine Waters mug is 'trocious!!! Yuck.
All b.s. aside, her & her liberal ilk will only be happy when those WMDs show up in an L.A. mall, oh, maybe exploding in the middle of large a food court about 1:17 p.m. on Saturday. Then another in about 13 minutes at the other food court. Lovely.
No, no little dinky Sbarro's Pizza Joint like Hamas does over in Tel Aviv - we're talkin real deal, massive blood & guts. This aint no joke.
While may GOD FORBID that ever happens, I hope they dont't get amnesia when the debate starts. Remember who was "presiding", supposedly, when so-called Saddam told the punk ass UN inspectors to get the @#%* out!!
("I ain't gettin rid of no WMD and you aint inspectin nuthin!" Yes, Mr. Hussein. Don't worry about the cease fire agreement, Dude. It's cool.)
They are scared to death OF answering that crucial question that led us to this point - hence all the silly, made-up distractions, of course.
1) Mr. Clinton, how could and why did you allow Saddam to call off UN inspections?
2) Were you not the most powerful man in the world, duty bound to protect American lives??
3) Did did you not take seriously that those weapons would be supplied those trying to kill us?"
Therefore, that angry heffa needs to shut her fat, stinkin, pie hole......and hope my concerns don't become reality. Alright, people, I don't really know if it really IS a stinky mouth.
I suppose "it depends on what the definition of IS.............is." Right, right. Loser Boy.
Posted by: Beau at May 07, 2004 02:57 AM (GpmN8)
7
Moonbat, indeed. Sigh. Just once, just once, I want to see them take on Sudan. Or Mauritania. Or Zimbabwe.
Posted by: Lola at May 07, 2004 04:06 AM (V1eTE)
8
Berkeley's other revenge.
Posted by: Walter Wallis at May 07, 2004 08:54 AM (83KyP)
9
This is the same gal who claimed that she "had to" march for abortion, because her mother could not get one. Think a moment on that.
Her lunacy is almost comic.
BTW, I thought that was a pic of Mick Jagger.
Posted by: ben at May 07, 2004 11:38 PM (Xaong)
10
Keep in mind that these people want to govern us!
Liberals like this woman seem to have the whole "group mentality" going on, in that, if one person in the group does it, that means that everyone else in the group does it, in here reference to the abuse in Iraq. That's just like saying that all Black people like fried chicken, all southerners are in the KKK, all Mexicans wear sombreros, all Japanese like Anime, etc. etc.
If I were Californian, I'd be downright ashamed that I had such a basketcase bitch representing me.
Posted by: Mob_Triggerman at May 08, 2004 01:25 AM (/E8Lq)
11
"If I were Californian, I'd be downright ashamed that I had such a basketcase bitch representing me."
No offence to Californians by that statement. I meant that I'd be really shocked if she were somehow re-elected after making such a retarded statement.
Posted by: Mob_Triggerman at May 08, 2004 01:32 AM (/E8Lq)
12
If these liberals are so concerned about "respect for third world culutre" and "the Muslim street" why don't they simply convert to Islam? Then at least fatmouthed broads like Maxine will have to shut up and cover their faces.
Posted by: Jim at May 08, 2004 02:54 AM (kgb8w)
13
Mob Triggerman: She'll be re-elected, no doubt. (I live in the district.) The mindset around here cares more about the *image* of a black woman talking back to "the man" than the substance of what that woman is actually saying. You can bet that few around know or care about something so stupid as the "so-called Saddam" phrasing or the "abortion" quote. She's been saying stuff like that for years.
Posted by: Juliette at May 08, 2004 11:05 AM (102g2)
14
That's a shame, Juliette.
Great post, Michael, and the new site's great. Blogroll link updated! (and thanks for the well-wishes.)
Posted by: maura at May 08, 2004 11:09 AM (OO/sE)
15
Some of us old crocks can remember when Martin Luther King was referred to, in some circles, as "the so-called Reverend Martin Luther King."
Posted by: Wild Bill at May 08, 2004 02:58 PM (vOiP6)
16
Wild Bill: If someone were skeptical about Dr. King's Christianity or ordination, refering to him as a "so-called reverend" makes sense. If they referred to him as so-called Martin Luther King, however, then they're stupid, since it is a fact that the man's name was Martin Luther King and not Joe Blow.
This same concept applies to the phrase "so-called Saddam."
Posted by: Juliette at May 09, 2004 11:03 AM (102g2)
17
What the heck???? Who is she working for? Cut her out of there....
Posted by: cutters at May 10, 2004 03:01 PM (W1op8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A FRANK guide to polite political discussion
One of Frank's
guidelines (and I quote)
DON'T punch the other person through the chest, pull out his heart, and show it to him before he dies when you feel run into a corner. That's usually a non-sequitur to the debate... unless the debate is whether you can actually pull someone's heart out and show it to him before he dies.DON'T pile drive the other person into a folding table when you find a topic you vehemently disagree on. Though it would be cool, it's just not civil.
DON'T silently lower the other person in a slow dipping device into a pit full of ravenous monkeys until he admits you're right.
Aw, mannnnnnn.... Why not?
Posted by: mhking at
12:04 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.
I guess I hit a nerve

Amy Ridenour over at the National Center (parent organization of Project 21) got some
interesting "hate mail" the other day, ostensibly in the wake of my appearance last week on Fox News Channel's
Hannity & Colmes.
You call youselves "conservatives!" What do Black Americans have to conserve in America? You should be looking to be "progressives"? Black Americans need a lot more progress in order to gain as compared to the White Americans. We don't need to "conserve" things the way they are right now. GET A GRIP, YOU BUNCH OF "UNCLE TOMS." Paulette Clarke PPClarke@proskauer.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and its attachments are sent by a lawyer and may contain information that is confidential and protected by privilege from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from printing, copying, forwarding or saving them. Please delete the message and attachments without printing, copying, forwarding or saving them, and notify the sender immediately.
This morning,
Amy notes that another lawyer from that same law firm showed up on FNC's
The O'Reilly Factor last night.
According to Google, Christopher Wolf [the lawyer in question --M] wrote an essay published on GigaLaw.com entitled “Racists, Bigots and the Law on the Internet.” The piece describes the legal limitations on prosecution for Internet hate speech and advises that the “best antidote” to hate speech is “more speech.”So, in the spirit of taking his advice, here’s some more speech:
Dear Proskauer Rose LLP, It is rude to call black conservatives “Uncle Toms.”
Please inform your staff.
Thank you.
Rock on, Amy!
Posted by: mhking at
04:41 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 262 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Definitely the perfect response. And the only civil way to deal with those types of letters.
Posted by: Daniel at May 06, 2004 05:40 AM (Oc6V9)
2
You should replace the headshot at the top of this site with the picture from CNN. In the piture at top, you look congenial and friendly. The sort of person I would let baby sit my kids (if I had any, which I don't, thank God). In the CNN picuter you look pissed and a little bit scary (regardless of your emotions at the time).
Posted by: Beck at May 07, 2004 12:36 AM (fllfQ)
3
Doesn't she know that Progressives have nothing to do with progress? It is word that indicates that one is a socialist. It sounds better than saying socialist and confounds people who think it only says we should make some kind of progress at some thing.
It is not surprising to me how stupid doctors and lawyers are when it comes to normal life and such things. Saying some one is a doctor or lawyer usually indicates that this is one stupid person outside of thier specialty.
Posted by: Bruce at May 07, 2004 09:12 AM (+iTIZ)
4
I love it! The perfect response, and concise, too.
Posted by: Tracey at May 07, 2004 12:04 PM (puqM+)
5
Dude, you rock. This is like watching a pitcher throw a no-hitter every few starts. If ever you need someone to help you carry the load, I'm in the book.
Posted by: Chris at May 07, 2004 05:14 PM (2BJ5i)
6
A laughably rigged talk show like "Hannity & Colmes" is much more worthy of mocking e-mails than this guy will ever be.
Posted by: Stephen Silver at May 08, 2004 01:06 PM (ospB3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Prez pauses to comfort teen

It was a
moment lost on most; the media, for the most part, missed it -- they're too wrapped up in trying to pin the Iraqi abuse photos on him.
President Bush, at an appearance near Cincinnati yesterday, paused for a moment and morphed from the "leader of the free world," and became "simply" a father and a man.
As the President walked down a line of supporters and well wishers, he passed Lynn and Ashley Faulkner, and their neighbor, Ashley Prince.
Prince said to him, "This girl lost her mom in the World Trade Center on 9-11."
Bush stopped and turned back."He changed from being the leader of the free world to being a father, a husband and a man," Faulkner said. "He looked right at her and said, 'How are you doing?' He reached out with his hand and pulled her into his chest."
Faulkner snapped one frame with his camera.
"I could hear her say, 'I'm OK,' " he said. "That's more emotion than she has shown in 21/2 years. Then he said, 'I can see you have a father who loves you very much.' "
"And I said, 'I do, Mr. President, but I miss her mother every day.' It was a special moment."
It was obvious to Faulkner that this is a man who truly cares.
"I'm a pretty cynical and jaded guy at this point in my life," Faulkner said of the moment with the president. "But this was the real deal. I was really impressed. It was genuine and from the heart.""The way he was holding me, with my head against his chest, it felt like he was trying to protect me," Ashley said. "I thought, 'Here is the most powerful guy in the world, and he wants to make sure I'm safe.' I definitely had a couple of tears in my eyes, which is pretty unusual for me."
Now there are those who will continue to assail this guy -- and why? Because they want to blame him for all the ills in the world. Because they didn't get their way four years ago. Because he personifies something they don't like.
Those folks will call this a "convenient photo op."
But it's obvious that it is something more. Otherwise, the networks wouldn't go out of their way not to show it. They don't show it, because it makes him more human, not less. And they want to make him as "inhuman" and "inhumane" as they possibly can.
Posted by: mhking at
04:26 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 424 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Didn't take long for the "photo op" bashing to start. Democratic Underground has a whole thread on it - about fifty or so disparaging remarks about this poignant moment.
If they don't want to see any goodness in our President, they won't. Nothing will change their views at this point, not even if he creates world peace or finds a cure for cancer.
Posted by: michele at May 07, 2004 01:21 AM (c9A+j)
2
Good piece. As a Briton, Mr Bush comes across to me as essentially a decent man. As a small-govt libertarian-conservative, I have my quarrels with him, but don't doubt his good character. I hope he wins in November.
Don't get me started on the Dem Undergound creeps or Indiemedia et al. That a Republican has ordinary human feelings is a concept they cannot grasp. These folk are just sociopaths. Why did they become so warped? (Perhaps there is a phd thesis in that).
Great blog!
Posted by: Tom at May 07, 2004 03:17 AM (suTgI)
3
I disagree with many if not most of his policies. And he represents what I consider the most dangerous trend in American politics -- inherited power. (Like the Kennedys, the Senators Dole, President and Senator Clinton, the dowager Senator Carnahan, the junior Senator Gore...) Given a credible rival or even a decent third party candidate I would vote against the Shrub.
But I admire his character. This picture represents, IMO, the apology his opponents have demands. He knows that the attack, and the disaster it presents to the families, happened on his watch, and is his mess to clean up. I think he truly "feels the pain"; would like to kiss it and make it better. Knows he can't, and nobody can. That hug is a two-way thing.
"I'm sorry, baby."
"I know you are, boss. Don't do it again. And go fix it."
Posted by: pouncer at May 07, 2004 04:02 AM (wSBsc)
4
Clinton is mostly to blame for 9/11, but Bush is bearing all responsibility for it. That is as it should be, since in a short 8 months, Bush was unable to undo the damage to the national security apparatus that Clinton did in a long 8 years.
There are many Ashleys to be comforted, and many more to be, in this terrorism war that has been declared by radical muslims against the west.
At least someone in power is willing to take a moment to hold an Ashley.
Posted by: RB at May 07, 2004 06:50 AM (g+fAu)
5
Bleh. Neither Clinton nor Bush is to blame for 9/11. Terrorists are responsible for their own actions. It is as simple as that.
Posted by: Tracey at May 07, 2004 12:09 PM (puqM+)
6
That picture says it all, doesn't it?
Great blog.
Bob
Posted by: Bob Baird at May 07, 2004 06:28 PM (659wy)
7
Hmm Tracy, while I partially agree with your argument, I have to admit that had Clinton acted differently, 9-11 would not have happened. And he had several opportunities to stop the attitude and Usama in particular.
It was Clinton that pulled US troops out of Mogadishu, after Black Hawk Down. Thereby giving Usama the idea that America was soft, and a mass casualty in America would cause us to cut and run. His actions in response to the African embassy bombings, the Doha towers (-2sp) in Saudi Arabia, and his refusal to take Usama from the Sudan all contributed greatly to the belief that whacking America was a safe bet.
On one level Tracy, you are right. It is the terrorist who did it. But on another level, they did it because they thought they could get away with it. They had in the past, with almost no consequence. Thanks to Clinton.
Posted by: Ben at May 07, 2004 11:48 PM (Xaong)
8
One more example that this President says what he means and has a special integrity. Another reason I'm proud of him.
Thank you for this blog, good work, mhk.
(A FReeper)
Posted by: hocndoc at May 08, 2004 01:02 PM (TMypr)
9
Great blog. Haven't found a single thing I agree with, yet I still haven't had my intelligence insulted. That's a rare combination.

I am personally devoted to getting Bush out of office, preferably on a political rail. I consider him a complete disaster in terms of political philosophy and in terms of execution of that philosophy.
But to take that view of his execution of the office he's so clearly unsuited to and assume that makes him completely worthless as a human being, a total fool, sociopath, etc is completely unfair.
And it shows the lack of "nuance" that the left accuses the right of (shrewdly enough, in general.)
No, I think he is in some ways the Republican version of Carter - shoved into office because he was electable, not because it was an intrinsically good idea. (Sigh)
Oh, by the way - I hated the idea of Gore about as much, and the reason I want to see his political scalp nailed to the Trueman balcony is that he did just about everything I was convinced Gore would have had we been so foolish as to elect him. And then went on to commit further errors of expansive big gumment Liberalism.
I was hoping against hope for at least a Nixon and what we got was LBJ, trying to impose a Great Society on the Middle East.
But personally speaking, LBJ was a nice man too.
Albeit a Texan. (Now running for cover....)
Posted by: Bob King at May 09, 2004 06:16 AM (kQW8w)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 05, 2004
I'm all for marketing, but this is just plain going overboard

Major League Baseball and Sony Pictures
are teaming up on a new kind of promotion.
Bases at 15 ballparks around the nation will be stamped with an ad promoting the upcoming motion picture Spider-Man 2 the weekend of June 11-13.
The image, as seen here, will adorn bases in all the MLB parks where games are taking place that weekend. Spider-Man logos and designs will also adorn pitchers' mounds and on deck circles at the ballparks.
"This is the perfect alliance between two quintessential national pastimes -- baseball and movie-going," said Geoffrey Ammer, president of worldwide marketing for the Colombia TriStar Motion Picture Group. "This partnership celebrates superheroes, whether they are on the field or on the big screen and we are extremely excited about the opportunity to create this unique promotion with Major League Baseball.""Over the past year and a half, we've been doing substantive research to determine the best ways to market the game into the 21st century, and we have overwhelming evidence that we have a property that's . . . never been stronger," said Jacqueline Parkes, senior vice president of advertising and marketing for MLB. "One thing that came out of the research is that we have a huge opportunity with kids, to bring them into the game. We needed to engage them in relevant and meaningful ways.
Most people have become used to the advertising on the outfield walls and behind home plate, but this seems to be a step beyond where advertisers should go.
What's next? Team logos on baseball uniforms, along the lines of what you get from NASCAR uniforms and cars?
Posted by: mhking at
05:45 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 290 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Baseball has lost me now. My interest has been waning for several years, but after this I don't care if I ever watch another MLB game again.
And I thought they'd have to reinstate Pete Rose to push me over the cliff. Lucky for me I've got a minor league team right close.
Posted by: Ted at May 06, 2004 02:36 AM (blNMI)
2
I was unaware that movie-going was a national pastime. Methinks Mr. Movie Studio exaggerates a bit. However, it's being reported that the Yankees are only going to use the bases during batting practice on one day. Also, the Yankees and Red Sox are reported to be getting $100K, while the other 13 home clubs are getting $50K.
Posted by: Rabbit at May 06, 2004 04:20 AM (ikdVG)
3
The day that "Live DJ" replaces "organ player" at Minute Maid Park is the day I stop going to Astros games (nevermind that they already play way too much pop between innings, at least there's still organ music between plays).
Posted by: Beck at May 07, 2004 12:38 AM (fllfQ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bobby to stand trial for smacking Whitney

Bobby Brown was
ordered to stand trial today by a Fulton County judge for physically assaulting his wife, singer Whitney Houston.
Judge Barry Zimmerman made the ruling in a five minute long hearing this afternoon in Atlanta.
Brown was ordered to turn himself in to Fulton County authorities in July for fingerprinting when he would be released on a $2,000 bond. Zimmerman also warned Brown again having "violent contact" with Houston.
Houston called 911 from their Alpharetta home in early December to report that Brown threatened to beat her "and then struck the left side of her face with an open right hand," according to Fulton County police officials.
Brown addressed the report's specifics in an April interview with Dateline NBC.
"I got big hands, man. I would hurt her, you know? It would be more than just a little cut on the lip."
Brown further described the incident as a "little spat." He said the two were playfully "slap boxing" and Houston took one of his jabs a "little serious."
Brown has been in jail twice this year. In February, he spent a month in jail for multiple probation violations before being released a month early for a March child-support hearing in Massachusetts. There, he spent another night in jail before paying a former lover more than $60,000 in back child-support payments.
Posted by: mhking at
03:45 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 235 words, total size 2 kb.
A flowery high

North of the Canadian border, some kids are
getting creative about how they get their high. They're using morning glory seeds.
You heard me. Morning glory seeds.
From what I understand, the seeds contain lysergamide, a less-potent version of LSD. The potency depends on the batch, but typically a dose equivalent to 75 micrograms of LSD requires 200 seeds or so.
A 14-year-old recently tried to buy the seeds from a Canadian Tire store near Halifax, NS.
"He was pretty nervous and once he was questioned what he was using them for, he finally admitted he wanted to crush them and put them in a drink," says clerk Adam Peters.
At Halifax Seed, manager Tim Tregunno says it has been 10 years since they've had a customer with a hidden agenda. The problem is easy to spot, he adds.
Asking for five to ten pounds of seeds at one fell swoop is a dead giveaway.
Whatever happened to Mad Dog, Champale, Colt 45 & 151?
Posted by: mhking at
05:36 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What happened is that alcohol is legal and regulated and therefore hard to get. Flower seeds are not (as far as I know) regulated, hence getting them should, in theory, present no difficulty.
One wonders why these kids aren't simply buying pot, as that's apparently easier to get than beer or cigarettes (though flower seeds have the advantage of not being illegal:-).
Posted by: Jason Bontrager at May 07, 2004 12:27 PM (kLvgB)
2
Old news, friends - I knew kids trying this in the '70s in the good old U.S.A. Not me, of course! Of course, the Carter administration made hallucinations seem attractive...
Posted by: Joseph K at May 08, 2004 11:45 AM (b0BAl)
3
Just this past weekend three teens at a party became seriously ill while attempting to get high from these seeds. One of the boys liver has failed and another has lost his vision, hopefully both are temperary side effects
Posted by: Julia at September 19, 2005 06:36 AM (vcU1t)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Double-bagging posts
Yes, for now, I'm double-posting new entries.
I'm working on a new home for Ramblings' Journal, courtesy of the humble folks at mu.nu.
Moving over to Munuviana does pose some issues; not the least of which is learning the intricacies and nuances of Movable Type.
My only exposure to using MT up to now is my infrequent post over at Blogcritics. Which reminds me that I'm overdue for something new to post over there. I've had this part-finished review of SSX 3 (one of the best sports-based video games out there, save the Madden franchise) sitting on my drive for the past few months, which needs a jolt from me to get finished.
Then again, I'm also dealing with trying to get the first chapter of my book finished as well (if nothing else, than to keep She-Who-Must-Be-Obeyed off of my back).
Add to that two job interviews so far this week, at least one more tomorrow, and a radio interview on Friday (I'm scheduled to be on Lee Rodgers' morning show on KSFO San Francisco in the 8A PT hour, take a listen if you get a chance!), plus the kids' various practices (Mitchell's choir; Jasmine's orchestra), and keeping up with an active 2 year-old between job-search activities, and you can see that my hands and plate are pretty full.
But enough of that.
The new home will still be called Ramblings' Journal (http://mhking.mu.nu/), and yes, I'll eventually paint and spruce up the place with something more than the basic MT template soon enough.
I'm actually pretty jazzed about it, and thrilled to be throwing off the yokes of BlogSpot and the headaches associated with it!
Posted by: mhking at
04:42 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 281 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Your cup runneth over! Enjoy God's blessings.
Posted by: La Shawn Barber at May 05, 2004 12:42 PM (tW8zw)
2
Ah, doesn't it feel good to be off of blogger? There are so many more customizations that you have at your fingertips with MT. You're going to LOVE it even more once you get used to it.
Posted by: Linda at May 05, 2004 01:57 PM (AWAw8)
3
Yay! (the traditional Munuvian greeting)
Posted by: Ted at May 06, 2004 05:59 AM (blNMI)
4
Also, the preferred Munuviana greeting, "Yay."
Posted by: Mamamontezz at May 06, 2004 12:12 PM (YkW3i)
5
http://drug.medicinetrail.org/pcp_drugtreatment/
dear coliseumdescribedguarded
Posted by: compliment at June 17, 2005 11:49 AM (4CgFr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Oliver, welcome to the Right Side

Former Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX) Congressional Chief of Staff Oliver Kellman
can't hook up with his former boss these days.
Not that anyone was expecting her to truly call him back.
Why the switch? To put it bluntly, Kellman got tired.
"After I left the Hill, I opened up a lobbying shop [Kellman & Associates]. As a lobbyist, you work with people on both sides of the aisle....Really, I just got fed up. WeÂ’ve raised some money for the party, and just the attitude of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] toward returning our phone calls" was surprising.
LaShawn Barber
finds it hard to believe that the notion of returning phone calls is enough to get you to switch horses, but I've seen decisions made over far less.
Does that make Kellman somewhat shallow? Perhaps; no more so than former Clinton staffer Dick Morris appears to be.
But the bottom line for Kellman: “I’m being ignored. There are a number of African-American lobbyists and we all say the same thing — we are being ignored.”
There's the larger issue.
Black America is taken for granted by the left. And an increasing number of black folks are getting sick and tired of it.
I'm glad to have him on our side of the aisle. Let's hope that his voice can add to the rest of ours.
Posted by: mhking at
03:57 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 228 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Michael- I had no idea you were making the move to Movable Type! I followed the trackback link and thought I was in the wrong place. I'll be joining you soon.
Posted by: La Shawn Barber at May 05, 2004 04:12 AM (Qa+f/)
2
It's about frazzlin' time, too!
I'm glad to be here!
Now, the next trick is to finish moving...
Posted by: mhking at May 05, 2004 04:25 AM (61djB)
3
Hey Michael,
Oliver Kellman e-mailed me. I updated the blog entry to reflect that.
Posted by: La Shawn Barber at May 11, 2004 08:17 AM (Qa+f/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 04, 2004
What part of "isolated incident" do you not understand?
Everyone has seen the photos. Everyone in the US. Everyone around the world.
The photos of a pile of naked bodies, with two beaming soldiers smiling as they stand over it.
Photos of a prisioner standing on a box, while wired to God knows what.
Photos of men, whose sole desire for Americans is that we all die.
Photos of men with more in common with the animals that flew planes into buildings two and a half years ago, killing thousands here.
People across this nation are reacting in shock and horror at those photos, and, while they continue to be fed by a willing and complicit press, those same people are starting to compare our military and the Bush Administration with the Saddam regime.
I have heard people -- some otherwise very intelligent people -- insist that the President and the Administration are no better than Saddam Hussain and his sons, because of this incident. This isolated incident.
These same self-righteous people are so wrapped up in their images, fed by the loathing of reporters from CBS and CNN, from ABC and the Washington Post, from NBC and the New York Times. Fed by Pacifica and Indymedia. Fed by Ted Rall and Michael Moore. They are so wrapped up with the constant barrage of hatred that they forget the reality: that this was an isolated incident which was soundly denounced by officials from the President on down.
The radicalists are trying their damnedest to not only try to paint this isolated incident as standard operating procedure for our military, but to insist that this is how we treat prisioners in this country, too. That police departments across the nation use these so-called procedures as the normal course of business for law enforcement.
Everyone trots out the Geneva Convention as a sort of blanket to throw over this situation.
The vast majority of people fail to recognize that the Geneva Convention does not apply to this situation. That's right. Does. Not. Apply.
The Geneva Convention was designed as a sort of "Marquis of Queensbury" rules for engagement for countries and entities in military conflict.
The problem is that the Islamists do not subscribe to the Convention -- that is, until their thugs get caught.
The Geneva Convention says that a captured individual is and must be treated as a military prisioner of war only if he is reporting to a commander, if he wears a distinctive insignia recognizable at a distance, if he carries arms openly, and if he, himself, conducts himself according to the rules of war. The Islamists do not do that. They dress as the remainder of the civilian population. They do not report to a commander. They do not have a recognizable insignia. They do not carry arms openly.
They do not conduct themselves according to the rules of war.
They throw the rulebook out the window. They hit below the belt. They headbutt. They try to bite off their opponent's ear, to coin an expression.
Are we, as a nation, obligated to use the rulebook, when our opponents have thrown out the same rulebook? Are we obligated to hamstring ourselves while dealing with an enemy who wants nothing more than to kill each and every last American soul?
I'm not condoning what happened in those isolated incidents in Iraq. On the contrary. Those activities are reprehensible.
But those activities are not indicative of our fighting men and women. They are not a part of the concept of truth, justice and the American way.
They are not a part of "normal."
And at the same time, for someone to try to not only equate that isolated incident with SOP, and to then say that we are worse than Saddam has no logical concept of what "normal" is. They have no concept of what Saddam was.
Saddam had rape rooms. Saddam had torture chambers. Saddam had children's prisons. Saddam had mass graves. Saddam used giant shredders to feed living, screaming people into, in order to prolong their pain and agony. Saddam was a tyrant. Saddam was an evil man.
Saddam today, is a sad, old man awaiting his fate; undoubtedly in front of a firing squad.
Contrary to Charles Barron's incessant screeching in my ear on Hannity & Colmes last week, the Coalition of the Willing has rebuilt the infrastructure of the Iraqi nation in less than one year. Schools are open. Hospitals are open. Newspapers are printing. Markets are opening. Telephone service has been restored. Mail service has been reestablished. Internet and e-mail service, believe it or not, is coming.
This does not sound like the activities of a tyrant. This does not sound like the activities of an Administration that is "worse than Saddam."
This is the picture that Katie Couric and others in the press do not want you to see. This is the reality that John Kerry and Hillary Clinton do not want you to know.
This is the truth of the victory of President Bush and the Coalition.
Posted by: mhking at
03:44 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 854 words, total size 5 kb.
1
"
this problem is widespread and will blow sky high in the coming days."
You mean as the BBC fabricates more stories?
Posted by: Jay G. (a.k.a. Guy) at May 05, 2004 07:25 AM (1Z0tY)
2
Isolated incident? You are either in denial or are mentally deficient. this problem is widespread and will blow sky high in the coming days. Otherwise, why would your hero Bush be on Arab TV, today? Twice?
Posted by: Harvey at May 05, 2004 08:13 AM (BHNvD)
3
It's called "damage control."
It's called keeping rumor from running rampant.
What do you think, that at Parris Island, Marines have a course called "Humiliating Prisoners 101?"
C'mon. Think about this clearly.
Posted by: mhking at May 05, 2004 08:27 AM (61djB)
4
Great post. Very well-put.
Posted by: songstress7 at May 05, 2004 01:21 PM (95fiz)
5
Look, Kerry confessed to committing the same kinds of atrocities that he accused other servicemen of in 1971. Kerry is a confessed war criminal and the Democratic candidate for the Presidency. So pardon me if I don't buy all the hoopla the Dems are making of this issue.
Yes, the Iraqi prison issue is bad. It should be noted that it is also OLD NEWS. The Army got a complaint on Jan 13th, and by the end of the month, BG Karpinsky, the commanding officer had already been releived of command, and the rest of the soldiers involved were under investigation. Criminal proceeding have already been started on all of these soldiers by the time it made the news.
Posted by: Ben at May 07, 2004 11:56 PM (Xaong)
6
Isolated incident, or another Somalia?
I viscerally recall seeing a grinning, tattooed and bestial-looking Canadian Special Forces member saying to a videocamera that they couldn't leave Somalia because "We ain't killed enough niggers yet."
Aside from the obvious moral lapse, saying such things on tape clearly shows a lack of situational awareness.
(
Newsworld retrospective)(
Washington Post)
Two eerie paragraphs from the latter source seem prophetic.
The commission's report, titled "Dishonoured Legacy," included recommendations that the military police and justice system be placed under independent command and that an inspector general be established to investigate military operations.
"Our recommendations are concerned with ensuring that Canadian military personnel will never again be sent on hastily formed, ill-conceived missions that lack clear objectives," Letourneau said.
The problem was in part due to the hard core of Aryan Nations members in the Canadian Airborne, which if tolerable at all, certainly disqualified them for deployment to Somalia in any sort of "hearts and minds" role.
And history repeats itself...
Lynndie England, 21, a rail worker's daughter, comes from a trailer park in Fort Ashby, West Virginia, which locals proudly call "a backwoods world".
She faces a court martial, but at home she is toasted as a hero.
Snip...
The story further states this:
In Fort Ashby, in the isolated Appalachian mountains 260km west of Washington, the poor, barely-educated and almost all-white population talk openly about an active Ku Klux Klan presence.
In the war on terror, we recruit our own domestic terrorists. What depressing irony.
I don't play the race card very often at all - but when it's a clear and obvious factor in a FUBAR - and furthermore, one that SHOULD have been known to be a potential issue in choice of unit assignments, I don't feel it should be ignored, either.
Frankly, I don't see how the contrary could be argued rationally even by a white supremacist, granted, for the sake of argument, that the word "rational" can even be used in such a context.
Oh, I'm not arguing from a bleeding-heart perspective here; it's purely pragmatic. Foreseeable cultural conflicts matter, especially when trying to generate useful intelligence. Even if being "sensitive" compromised immediate results, the long-term value of demonstrating the palpable difference between civilized and Saddam would be worth it, and would generate leads in the long term.
Aside from that, having people there who could not and would not read social cues was in itself a lost opportunity - perhaps unavoidable, but there it 'tis.
And finally, whether or not there's an obligation to obey the Geneva convention, it would have been very wise and politically opportune to not just obey it, but in fact fully adhere to Constitutional requirements for the treatment of US citizens, seeing as part of the role there is in fact building institutions - part of that has to come by example.
Aside from that, that's a modus many of the Reserve forces know in their sleep, so it would have made pragmatic sense as well. I personally think the social impact of miranda warnings, for example, would have outweighed any downside.
But nobody asked me, so of course the current situation was inevitable. [tongue firmly in cheek.]
Posted by: Bob King at May 09, 2004 07:13 AM (kQW8w)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Al "Log! Log! Log!" Gore finally ready to close on NWI

From
Wonkette:
A Wonkette operative tells us that Al Gore plans to annouce at
noon CST today that he and partner Joel Hyatt have successfully
acquired the Newsworld International cable channel from Vivendi. Gore
will make news of the sale to his company, "IndTV" (clever!), public at
the annual convention of the National Association of Broadcasters
[I'm an idiot. That was last week.] National Association of Cable &
Telecommunications. The content of channel will not change, says our
operative, "They bought a full-functioning network. . . they're
probably gradually going to change it." (Well, someone's learned something from Air America...)
No word on what'll happen (realistically) to some of the "better" NWI programming (DW's
European Journal & CBC's
The National among others).
NWI is available on digital cable systems nationally as well as on DirecTV (Channel 366).
Posted by: mhking at
11:41 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.
May 03, 2004
Let me lug this box in......
[thump!]
Oops...sorry.... didn't mean to trip over that...
I'll be moving furniture in and around over the next little bit, while I try to get the hang of MT and figure out where I want stuff (although with my luck, I'll probably move it around once I get it in and look at it a bit. (one of the hazards of having a wife who likes to move stuff around...)
No matter.
Posted by: mhking at
01:21 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Welcome! If you need help with the china cabinet or the buffet, there are lots of strong backs over at Munuviana...
Posted by: Susie at May 05, 2004 01:42 AM (qnxUP)
2
Oh!
A scot Scotsman clad in kilt left the bar one evening fair
And one could tell by how he walked he'd drunk more than his share
He staggered on until he could no longer keep his feet
Then stumbled off into the grass to sleep beside the street.
cho: Ring ding diddle diddle i de o
Ring di diddle i o
He stumbled off into the grass to sleep beside the street.
Later on two young and lovely girls just happened by,
And one says to the other with a twinkle in her eye
You see yon sleeping Scotsman who is young and handsome built
I wonder if it's true what they don't wear beneath their kilt.
Ring ding diddle diddle i de o
Ring di diddle i o
I wonder if it's true what they don't wear beneath their kilt.
They crept up to the sleeping Scotsman quiet as could be
Then lifted up his kilt about an inch so they could see
And there behold for them to view beneath his Scottish skirt
Ws nothing but what God had graced him with upon his birth
Ring ding diddle diddle i de o
Ring di diddle i o
There was nothing there but what God gave upon his birth
They marveled for a moment then one said we'd best be gone
But let's leave a present for our friend before we move along
They took a blue silk ribbon and they tied it in a bow
Around the bonnie spar that the Scot's lifted kilt did show
Ring ding diddle diddle i de o
Ring di diddle i o
Around the bonnie spar that the Scot's lifted kilt did show
The Scotsman woke to nature's call and stumbled toward a tree
Behind a bush he lifts his kilt and gawks at what he sees
Then in a startled voice he says to what's before his eyes
He said, "Lad I don't know where you've been but I see you won
first prize"
Ring ding diddle diddle i de o
Ring di diddle i o
He said, "Lad I don't know where you've been but I see you won
first prize"
@Scots @bawdy @clothes
-----------------
Version 2
TITLE: The Scotsman
Well, a Scotsman clad in kilt, left a bar one evening fair,
and one could tell, by how he walked, that he'd drunk more than his share,
he fumbled round until he could no longer keep his feet
and he stumbled off into the grass to sleep beside the street
Chorus: Ring ding diddle diddle i dee oh,
Ring di diddly i oh,
(repeat last line of previous verse)
About that time two young and lovely girls just happend by
and one said to the other with a twinkle in her eye
See yon sleeping Scotsman so strong and handsome built
I wonder if it's true what they don't wear beneath the kilt
(Chours)
They crept up on the sleeping Scot as quiet as could be,
And lifted up his kilt about an inch so they could see,
And there behold for them to view beneath his Scotish skirt,
Was nothin' more than God had graced him with upon his birth.
(Chorus)
They marvelled for a moment then one said we must be gone,
Let's leave a present for our friend before we move along.
As a gift they left a blue silk ribbon tied into a bow,
Around the bonnie star the Scot's kilt did lift and show.
(Chorus)
Now the Scotsman woke to nature's call, and stumbled for a tree,
Behind the bush he lifts his kilt, and gawks at what he sees,
And in a startled voice he says, to what's before his eyes,
Ah*, lad I don't know where ya been but I see ya won first prize!
Posted by: Lamont Cranston at May 07, 2004 11:16 AM (qMTyo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A Song For Kilts
Robert Service
How grand the human race would be
If every man would wear a kilt,
A flirt of Tartan finery,
Instead of trousers, custom built!
Nay, do not think I speak to joke:
(You know I'm not that kind of man),
I am convinced that all men folk.
Should wear the costume of a Clan.
Imagine how it's braw and clean
As in the wind it flutters free;
And so conducive to hygiene
In its sublime simplicity.
No fool fly-buttons to adjust,--
Wi' shanks and maybe buttocks bare;
Oh chiels, just take my word on trust,
A bonny kilt's the only wear.
'Twill save a lot of siller too,
(And here a canny Scotsman speaks),
For one good kilt will wear you through
A half-a-dozen pairs of breeks.
And how it's healthy in the breeze!
And how it swings with saucy tilt!
How lassies love athletic knees
Below the waggle of a kilt!
True, I just wear one in my mind,
Since sent to school by Celtic aunts,
When girls would flip it up behind,
Until I begged for lowland pants.
But now none dare do that to me,
And so I sing with lyric lilt,--
How happier the world would be
If every male would wear a kilt!
Posted by: mhking at
06:38 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 218 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Susie at May 03, 2004 01:00 PM (qnxUP)
2
Yay!!1! Welcome to our world, Michael!
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 04, 2004 01:56 AM (N2Iab)
Posted by: Debbye at May 04, 2004 07:30 AM (Zg7IL)
Posted by: Daniel at May 06, 2004 05:38 AM (Oc6V9)
5
Yay!
Sorry I'm late for the party...I forgot the stupid beer, too.
Posted by: Victor at May 06, 2004 10:23 AM (L3qPK)
6
Just over her on a link from Vodkapundit, and what do I find but a poem from one of my favorite poets!
Lovely!
Posted by: wheels at May 07, 2004 06:52 AM (WUs5a)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
97kb generated in CPU 0.3255, elapsed 0.5531 seconds.
53 queries taking 0.5172 seconds, 205 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.