June 18, 2004
I love when Chris nails it on the head!
Good one, Chris!
Posted by: mhking at
05:10 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
June 17, 2004
9/11 Commission wrings hands 'cause Bush didn't react for "minutes" on 9/11
Shortly after 9AM on September 11, 2001,
while millions of us were watching disaster unfolding before our eyes, George W. Bush was in a classroom full of second graders in Sarasota, FL.
White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card bent down and whispered in the President's ear.
In a moment captured on video and replayed, White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card whispered in Bush's ear, saying, "A second plane hit the second tower. America is under attack." Bush's face froze, his lips tight.
Bush told the 9/11 Investigative Commission that his first instinct was to project calm. He felt the Nation shouldn't see him in an excited fashion in a moment of crisis. Not only that, but his first instinct was also not to alarm the children around him.
Information was very fluid in those first minutes, and decisions were being made on a split-second basis.
I can't fault President Bush for waiting a few moments, not only to avoid alarming those closest to him -- the children -- but also to say the most reassuring thing he could under the circumstances. To ensure that he and his team were on top of the crisis and that decisions were being made that could safeguard as many American lives as possible.
Say what you will about the President; but you cannot fault him for taking time to be deliberate throughout the 9/11 crisis period.
Posted by: mhking at
05:19 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 256 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I can only imagine what people would be saying if he'd looked shocked, jumped right up and rushed from the room: "He panicked!" "It scared the @#$!! out of him!" "He frightened those poor confused children when what they needed was to know their President had things under control!"
DIYDo, DIYDon't
Posted by: McGehee at June 18, 2004 02:49 AM (BCOpM)
2
It wouldn't have mattered if the man pulled out a Time Machine and singlehandedly stopped each plane, someone would whine that he had no right to mess with the Space-Time continuum.
Posted by: Marble at June 18, 2004 02:53 AM (VxPRK)
3
It's true. He could have jumped up in a Superman cape and singlehandedly intercepted those planes before they hit, and people would still criticize him.
As for myself, I've long held that image in my head as a point of reassurance. He was disciplined enough hold it together and remain calm for the sake of children, and then stand up and promise that he would do everything he could to protect America.
Who knows what he showed Laura in privacy? Who knows what tears he's shed in his darker moments? The point is that he has the self-control and discipline to remain calm in the face of crisis. That's not to say that he's perfect, but discernment is a tremendous skill for a leader to have.
Posted by: Linda at June 22, 2004 12:38 PM (EQSNS)
4
I am truly amazed by the comments posted on this site about this incident. The leader of the most powerful nation on earth sat there reading nursery rhymes to kids FOR NEARLY TEN MINUTES whilst America was under attack. What excuse is there for that, other than the fact that he knew of the attack beforehand.
I cannot believe that in the days after the attack, only three planes were allowed to fly in US airspace and they were planes filled with Bin Ladens family - there has been no explanation for this!!
I truly believe that this attack was instigated by the American government to gain public backing to go to war in the middle east. It is clear that a missle hit the Pentagon. A 767 plane does not leave a hole only 16 foot wide, and where did the plane, wings, engines, passengers, luggage etc go? There is no footage showing any remains on the grounds at the Pentagon.
I also believe that the second plane that hit the WTC was in fact a US military plane. Many observers to this incident report that the plane had no windows and couldn't possibly be a passenger plane.
I would strongly suggest that ALL american citizens watch the 'IN PLANE SITE' DVD. It is a real eye opener!! I just cannot believe that the american public have faith in this man!! Peace - Out!!!
Posted by: Deano at March 21, 2005 01:29 PM (F1nba)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The 'Instant Win' button
Bill Hobbs has
an open letter to Al Qaeda on his site that warns them about tempting fate. They can still be obliterated with a single button.
We didn't have to invade and liberate Iraq and try to help it become a democracy. We could have pushed a few buttons and made Kabul and Baghdad disappear. We didn't because we're the opposite of your dysfunctional, godless, immoral, backwards, oppressive, failure of a society. We pulled our punches. We sent in the reconstruction crews right behind the armor and the infantry.We didn't have to. We had - and still have - another option. One that would absolutely guarantee the end of the Islamofacist terror threat.
I bet that, if you blow up an American shopping mall and kill a bunch of innocent American kids and parents while they munch some Chik Fil A, or stand in line at Build-a-Bear or try on clothes at The Gap, a whole lot more Americans are going to reach the tipping point. The one where we say enough is enough, push the Instant Win button.
Don't test our patience.
"...and like that....they were gone..."
Posted by: mhking at
10:19 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 197 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What a arrogant and bullshit statement. This America has a legacy of genocide and Secret deals with terrorist to kill Americas percieved enemies. Your chickens are coming home to roost to quote a phrase. Stay the fuck out of other peoples countries trying to set up puppet governments and exploiting and stealing their natural resources. The world is tired of this shit and I guess they are'nt gonna take it anymore.
Posted by: scott at June 18, 2004 03:09 PM (AaBEz)
2
Scott, the "point" you made is total bullshit...
Its not about taking their resources, its about killing them before they kill us. They will never stop until, they see every american die. They will kill, shoot, bomb, and stab every single person in America and overseas, if they were able to... In this world, its kill or be killed.
Posted by: Alex at June 20, 2004 08:47 AM (87AuB)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Where were you ten years ago today?
I was riveted -- as was most of the nation --
to a surreal scene playing out on NBC.
A split screen showed Game Five of the NBA Finals from Madison Square Garden between the New York Knicks and Houston Rockets on one side of the screen. On the other? A white Ford Bronco on the other side of the continent, making it's way along the freeways of Los Angeles. Inside, OJ Simpson, then the prime suspect in the murder of his wife, Nicole just a few days before in the Brentwood section of LA. Simpson had a gun to his head, and his best friend, Al Cowlings in the other seat trying to talk to him.
OJ wanted to go...somewhere. Ultimately though, he wanted to go home.
OJ Simpson had been a hero to a generation of America, including me. Former football star, movie star, commercial pitchman and sports commentator. The very idea that he could have brutally butchered his estranged wife and her friend was completely foreign to me, as it was to much of the nation.
All we knew was that the scene of a slow-speed chase along the freeways of Southern California was bizarre enough, but for that to sit alongside the basketball game on the opposite side of the screen was one of the most surreal moments of television that had happened before or since.
This was before MSNBC and Fox News Channel even existed. Few people had any idea what CourtTV was, let alone what channel it was on, and CNBC was an obscure business channel. Which left us with images on CNN, ESPN and the bizarre split-screen on NBC.
Of course, now we know where things went from there: the arrest and booking, the assembling of the "dream team" for the "trial of the century." Wall-to-wall coverage of a type that hadn't been seen since Watergate, and wouldn't be seen again until 9/11. And finally the acquittal.
OJ lives in relative obscurity today near Miami -- raising his kids, and trying to stay out of the limelight, lest a skeptical America asks him how his "search for the 'real killers' is going."
At least until his recent interviews with Fox News' Greta Van Susteren and NBC's Katie Couric.
The story of OJ Simpson is the ultimate "hero-turned-heel" story. And one that, at least I hope, we don't have to see relived again any time soon.
Posted by: mhking at
08:59 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 416 words, total size 3 kb.
1
After OJ it became just a little harder to tout my USC alumni status.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 17, 2004 09:11 AM (JQjhA)
2
You can't imagine how absolutely horrified we Rockets fans were in Houston at the time. As I remember through a drunken, gauzy veil, the game coverage wasn't even a split-screen... the game was temporarily obliterated for a crucial stretch of the 3rd or 4th quarter, and we had to rip the host's clock radio out of the wall and tune it in to the game to get any coverage.
Posted by: norbizness at June 17, 2004 10:46 AM (EneHm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 16, 2004
Black Caucus members want to reinstate the draft!
I keep catching hell from folks who want to insist that a new draft is coming, and that the Bush Administration is engineering it so that "their rich kids" won't be caught up in it.
Citizen Smash has done the legwork to find out exactly who is behind this push.
But who is behind this movement to reinstate the draft? LetÂ’s check the Congressional Record.
In the House of Representatives:
Charles Rangel, NY
Neil Abercrombie, HI
Corrine Brown, FL
Donna M. Christensen,VI
William Lacy Clay, MO
John Conyers, Jr., MI
Elijah E. Cummings, MD
Alcee L. Hastings, FL
Sheila Jackson-Lee, TX
John Lewis, GA
Jim McDermott, WA
James P. Moran, VA
Eleanor Holmes Norton, DC
Fortney Pete Stark, CA
Nydia M. Velazquez, NY
In the Senate:
Fritz Hollings, SC
Never mind that both of these bills have been stuck in committee for over 18 months, and have almost no hope of ever seeing the light of day.
Now, what Smash doesn't point out here is that the aforementioned Messers. Rangel, Christensen, Clay, Conyers, Cummings, Hastings, Jackson-Lee, Lewis, and Norton are all Democrats and members of the Congressional Black Caucus. Mind you, the "Soul Patrol" are the ones who are most vocal to me about a new draft and "rich white kids" being protected.
Don't believe me? Check the Congressional Record yourself. The bills are S89 and HR163.
So now I ask you. Who really has black folks' best interests at heart, and who is selling out our children for "thirty pieces of silver?"
Posted by: mhking at
11:50 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 267 words, total size 3 kb.
1
You missed Rangel's explaination of why he put this out there.
1. It was to point out that the troop rotation is too hard on them. He wants the U.S. out of some areas, and by bringing up the idea of the draft, he's hoping to force a discussion.
2. What he proposed has far less exclusions than previous drafts. For example, no college deferment. So, in effect, he would get a broader cross section of people.
With that background, "
So now I ask you. Who really has black folks' best interests at heart, and who is selling out our children for "thirty pieces of silver?" I think your comment is a little off base.
Posted by: DarkStar at June 16, 2004 02:07 PM (cnw1A)
2
To the contrary any legislation is like the proverbial sausage. Once loosed on the congress critters it morphs, evolves, and just plain turns into a frank...........
Praise Allen.
Posted by: dorf at June 16, 2004 03:18 PM (WKXAz)
3
Rangel's explanation is one thing. His real motive is another--to try to make the war unpopular enough among college students that they start revolting in the streets like back in 1968. Why? Because you create a generation of morons that you can manipulate--see liberal baby boomers, for example.
Except that Rangel & Co are going to have a hard time explaining why they pushed those kids into the draft in the first place.
Posted by: Brainster at June 16, 2004 10:46 PM (XQEqy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Kenneth gives Bubba's book five stars
CBS anchordude Dan "What's the frequency, Kenneth" Rather was one of the few people
to get an advance copy of
My Life, Bill Clinton's new book. Ostensibly, he got ahold of it since he's going to
softball question the former President on this Sunday's
60 Minutes.
"Maybe he didnÂ’t come totally, absolutely clean with himself, but he made an effort to do it," he (Rather) said, "an effort it would be difficult to find with any former President."
'Kenneth' says he even likes the book.
"I liked it more than I thought I would," he said, "more than I was prepared to like it. Who knew that Bill Clinton could write this well?"
Bubba? Write? You sure it ain't a ghostwriter?
CBS is in an all-out full-court press on Bubba's book; don't forget the CBS Radio one-hour infomercial call-in talk show with Bubba with The Early Show's Harry Smith tomorrow evening at 6P ET.
My Life publisher Random House sure wants you to call in so that they can have a huge payoff with all of this free publicity.
Posted by: mhking at
10:05 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 190 words, total size 1 kb.
"Captain, the Romulans are massing along the Neutral Zone!"
Iran,
rubbing it's collective hands in glee at the notion of a power vacuum in Iraq, is massing it's troops along the Iraq-Iran border in anticipation of a US pull out (or even pull back) at the end of the month.
The Saudi daily Al-Sharq al-Awsat, monitored in Beirut, reports Iran has massed four battalions at the border.Al-Sharq al-Awsat quoted "reliable Iraqi sources" as saying, "Iran moved part of its regular military forces towards the Iraqi border in the southern sector at a time its military intelligence agents were operating inside Iraqi territory."
Well, Ketchup Boy? Are you ready to pull the troops out now?
Posted by: mhking at
05:41 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 127 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I feel we are closer to a confrontation of , for lack of a better phrase, biblical proportions. Can we keep the new Iraq up and running? Can we handle the threat of not only a nuclear Iran, but one that seeks to move in on its *neighbor*, attempting to impose its own theocracy on them if at all possible? And what about our staunchest ally in that area, Israel? I am beginning to think this is as sticky a (developing) situation as we ever faced.
Posted by: Guy S. at June 16, 2004 07:08 AM (f6cjG)
2
Just one question - how credible is this Saudi daily? Any news from Saudi media should be taken with a grain of salt.
Posted by: Lola at June 16, 2004 11:42 AM (V1eTE)
3
My proposal is that we pull our troops out of Iraq, by way of Tehran.
"Oh, don't mind us, we're just passing through. Our flight home is waiting in Kabul. What's that? You have a theocratic dictatorship here? Hey Sarge, can we do something about this while we're here?"
Posted by: McGehee at June 16, 2004 01:11 PM (BCOpM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Would-be Ohio bomber came to US legally as 'refugee'
As most know, a terrorist attack on a shopping mall in Columbus, OH was thwarted last week, with the arrest of one of the perps, Nuradin M. Abdi. Abdi was associated with Al Qaeda, and as Attorney General John Ashcroft keeps telling us as he nabs these folks, AQ wants to hit us at home, and hit us hard.
Michelle Malkin's new column this morning examines just how Abdi was able to quietly enter the US. Of course the unanswered question in all of this is how many other terrorists are out there plotting to blow up a shopping mall in Denver or an amusement park in Atlanta, or a ball park in St. Louis?
Nuradin M. Abdi, who was indicted last week for plotting with al-Qaida to blow up an Ohio shopping mall, flew here from Somalia and received bogus "refugee" status in 1999, according to authorities. Prosecutors allege that Abdi then fraudulently obtained a refugee travel document, which he used to fly to Ethiopia for jihad training. After returning, Abdi blended back into the American landscape along with tens of thousands of other refugees from a country known to be a breeding ground for Islamic terrorists. Columbus, Abdi's home base, is home to more than 30,000 Somalis — the second-largest Somali community in the United States, after Minneapolis.The Somali-al-Qaida connection is well-established. Intelligence reports indicate that Osama bin Laden sent extremists to Somalia in the early 1990s to train and organize the Somali Islamic radical group al-Ittihad al-Islamiya. Bin Laden claimed responsibility for the deaths of 18 American soldiers in Mogadishu. In addition, a Saudi Arabian-based Muslim charity with alleged ties to al-Qaida has been funding refugee camps in Somali border towns. The feds have frozen the Al-Haramain Foundation's assets based on terrorism grounds, but the flow of refugees from the overseas camps subsidized by the group has not been stanched.
Be safe, everyone. Be safe.
Posted by: mhking at
04:44 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 335 words, total size 2 kb.
1
in 1999, according to authorities. Prosecutors allege that Abdi then fraudulently obtained a refugee travel document, which he used to fly to Ethiopia for jihad training. After returning, Abdi blended back into the American landscape along with tens of thousands of other refugees from a country known to be a breeding ground for Islamic terrorists. Columbus, Abdi's home base, is home to more than 30,000 Somalis — the second-largest Somali community in the United States, after Minneapolis
Posted by: ali at January 13, 2005 08:02 AM (TgUpT)
2
i think this post in completly untrue because we know somalia is not Terrorist Base .. all what we know is that somalia is very poor country and the people up there are stragelling to Live .. There is Islamic fandamentals in there as they are in USA & Uk but there is no orginized terrorists in somalia ..... and as all the American People in Minneapolis saw .. The Somalian People Are Very Simple and They Respect The American Law 100%
Posted by: adam at July 29, 2005 01:06 PM (L4iqE)
3
Adam....Mr. "Abdi," is it?
Please proove the truth in your statement. How are we supposed to know that there are no terrorists in Somalia? What gives you the idea that we should believe you, huh?
Just because you say it's so?
I'll remember that the next time an Islamic terrorist tries to take out Westerners.
Until you and your fellow travelers begin to take steps to denounce and repudiate the Islamikazis and begin to take back your religion (which you have neglected to do since before 9/11, thank you very much), don't come whining to me about how Somalis or any other Muslim-worshiping nations or peoples are "simple," "peaceful," and "respect American law."
I don't believe you.
Moreover, I think you're full of used food.
Posted by: Michael at July 29, 2005 01:21 PM (bJ0qq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Leave it to Bubba, right?
Posted by: mhking at
02:21 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.
June 15, 2004
New AQ web video death threat to an American
An Al Qaeda-connected website
has a new video up, this time of kidnapped American Paul Johnson. Johnson is a technician for Lockheed-Martin in Saudi Arabia, working on Apache helicopters.
Johnson was reported missing last week; an AQ-connected website showed a picture of him, along with his Lockheed-Martin business card earlier this week.
The website says that Johnson will be killed unless Saudi authorities free al-Qaida prisoners within three days.
"My name is Paul Marshall Johnson, Jr.," the seated hostage says in the tape, an elaborate tattoo on his left shoulder. "I am an American. ... I work on Apache helicopters." The tape, which was first aired by CNN, also displayed his Lockheed Martin identification card.
The statement on the Web site says the holy warriors of the Arabian peninsula's Fallujah Brigade has "hit" the engineering team that "oversees the development of the American Apache helicopter that attacks Muslims in Palestine and Afghanistan."
It says: "The Fallujah Brigade has killed the director of this team and kidnapped one of its engineers, Paul Johnson, and if the tyrannical Saudi government wants their American master to be released, then they have to release our holy warriors that are held in Ha'ir, Ruweis and Alisha prisons within 72 hours of this statement's date or else we will sacrifice his blood to God in revenge for our Muslim brothers who have been liberally killed everywhere."
The Web site statement addressed Muslims all over the world, saying: "We have made a promise to ourselves to defend you. We will not let you down, and you should know that the treacherous tyrants who have helped the Americans against you, and shared your blood with them, do not represent the Muslims of Saudi Arabia. They are our enemies as much as they are your enemies. They are the enemies of God and his prophet."
On Monday, Johnson's son spoke to reporters about his father's love of Arabic culture. Paul Johnson III said his father once sent a copy of the Quran to his sister, with passages highlighted from the Islamic holy text that he felt were especially important.
"He felt he never had any fear for his safety and respects and honors their traditions and cultures," Johnson III said. "Dad said many times he loved living in Saudi Arabia."
Johnson's family could not be reached this evening for comment.
Posted by: mhking at
06:09 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 409 words, total size 3 kb.
The "beautimus" Michelle Malkin is in the house!
The "beautimus" (to quote Don King, no relation) Michelle Malkin has joined the rest of us here in the jungle of the blogosphere.
Mind you, she's hit the ground running, with an excoriation of Paul Krugman's ongoing lies in the New York Times.
Krugman is entitled to his opinion about Ashcroft, no matter how ridiculous, but as the saying goes, he is not entitled to his own facts.
I love it! Michelle not only says what needs to be said, but she does so with gusto!
Welcome to the jungle, Michelle! Glad you're here with the rest of us!
Posted by: mhking at
07:03 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 113 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I love her style. It's how I want to write when I grow up.
Posted by: La Shawn Barber at June 15, 2004 07:39 AM (Qa+f/)
2
Heeeeeey 'Chelle.......you wild woman you.
Posted by: Beau at June 15, 2004 08:24 AM (GpmN8)
3
Yowza. Give me Michelle over Wonkette anyday.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 15, 2004 11:19 AM (JQjhA)
4
To me, she is the epitome of hot:
Smart, opinionated (in the right way, of course), and gorgeous.
Yowza is right!!
TV (Harry)
Posted by: Inspector Callahan at June 15, 2004 11:26 AM (e7tal)
5
One week into blgging and she's already been instalaunched. Lucky bugger.
Posted by: Beck at June 16, 2004 12:37 AM (fllfQ)
6
The only thing that keeps her from being perfect in my eyes is that she's married. What's not to like--intelligent, conservative and incredibly gorgeous?
And she writes wonderfully. She deserves the instalink, even if Wonkette doesn't.
Posted by: Pat Curley at June 16, 2004 11:10 PM (XQEqy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Prepare for the worst of Abu Ghraib
Columnist Christopher Hitchens seems to straddle the ideological fence at times. Sometimes, he's clearly on the liberal side, at others, he's squarely on the conservative side. It's almost as if he can't decide where he truly is. Then again, in the minds of many, he's close enough to the center to provide a clear enough picture of reality.
In his newest piece for Slate, Hitchens takes a look at that dead horse that is Abu Ghraib, and points out that though it may be dead now, look for it to zombify and bite us all in the collective keyster real soon.
It is going to get much worse. The graphic videos and photographs that have so far been shown only to Congress are, I have been persuaded by someone who has seen them, not likely to remain secret for very long. And, if you wonder why formerly gung-ho rightist congressmen like James Inhofe ("I'm outraged more by the outrage") have gone so quiet, it is because they have seen the stuff and you have not. There will probably be a slight difficulty about showing these scenes in prime time, but they will emerge, never fear. We may have to start using blunt words like murder and rape to describe what we see. And one linguistic reform is in any case already much overdue. The silly word "abuse" will have to be dropped. No law or treaty forbids "abuse," but many conventions and statutes, including our own and the ones we have urged other nations to sign, do punish torture—which is what we are talking about here at a bare minimum.
So far, the press has focused on the questions "who knew" and "how far up did it go?" I'm equally interested in the question of how far down it has gone and how widespread it is.
I don't like looking at Abu Ghraib; I still think the people who have perpetrated the crimes there are the exception rather than the rule within the US military. Not only that, but the mainstream media in the country has gone out of their collective way to keep the story above the fold of the nation's papers, even when other, more pressing news has presented itself.
But that spectre is still there. And with the continued witch-hunt fostered by the initial pictures and stories, and fanned further by the uproar over Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 (whether his "documentary" is true or not), I have a fear that Hitchens is right -- that this will come back and bite us in the ass. Hard. When we least expect it or need it.
Posted by: mhking at
06:48 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 451 words, total size 3 kb.
June 14, 2004
CBS forces radio affiliates to take softball interview with Bubba
From
Drudge:
Bill Clinton is set to hit the talkradio waves with a live special promoting his new book -- one that CBS has ordered a "must carry" directive for all of its news affiliates.
Each and every one of CBS's news and talk stations will be required to take the Clinton book radio special, now scheduled for next 6 PM ET Thursday -- whether local programming management wants it or not!
"It's going to be like one big commercial for the book! Why didn't Mr. Clinton's publisher just buy an hour," one angry executive for a CBS news station said late Monday. "This is not news, this is marketing. I already feel dirty!"
The call-in special will be moderated by
Early Show host Harry Smith.
CBS' parent company Viacom also owns the publisher of Clinton's book, Simon & Schuster.
Posted by: mhking at
05:43 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 158 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Viacom subsidiaries publish Hilary's book, and Richard Clarke's, and . . . who were featured in 60 Mins . . . wait! do I see a pattern here?
Posted by: Fausta at June 15, 2004 03:41 AM (WhoVr)
2
(I meant to include Bob Woodward instead of the first ellipsis -- it's early in the AM!)
Posted by: Fausta, again at June 15, 2004 03:43 AM (WhoVr)
3
Can you imagine the outrage we'd hear if Fox pulled this with a Rush Limbaugh book or its equivalent?
Posted by: Beck at June 15, 2004 04:32 AM (fllfQ)
4
Fausta--to say nothing of the hard-sell pimp job Franken & co. at Air America Radio received.
Posted by: Beck at June 15, 2004 04:33 AM (fllfQ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Damn. The good guys keep dying...
Award winning sports writer and author Ralph Wiley
died last night of heart failure.
Wiley was formerly senior writer at Sports Illustrated, and the author and co-author of a number of books, including Why Black People Tend to Shout and By Any Means Necessary: The Trials and Tribulations of the Making of Malcolm X, which he co-wrote with Spike Lee.
Most recently, Wiley was a Page 2 columnist for ESPN.com, and penned more than 240 articles for them.
And while politically, he was to the left of the aisle, one has to admit that Ralph Wiley was one of America's best sportswriters. No, one of America's best writers. He'll truly be missed.
Wiley is survived by his son, Cole, and daughter, Maggie; his mother, Dorothy Brown, of Washington, D.C.; and his fiancé, Susan Peacock. He was 52.
Posted by: mhking at
04:59 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 1 kb.
1
They always say these things come in threes. Think we're done for a while now?
Posted by: Beck at June 15, 2004 04:34 AM (fllfQ)
2
man, what a bummer. I absolutely loved this guys columns at espn page 2. He would discuss race and sports in the most thought-provoking ways imaginable. This is yet another great loss.
His last great ESPN column here....a must read
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=wiley/040610
Posted by: Tman at June 15, 2004 05:57 AM (Fho+X)
3
Now I hate to piss on everyone's Ralph Wiley Love Fest, but this guy's sports commentary came straight out the Black Victimology Box - and he's every bit the hate whitey bigot that Spike Lee is; his boyyyy. If only Spike could be next. (I know, I'm cruel. And hate racists of all kinds, too.)
You see, n----rs like him are the ones that are holding us back, the ones that do not wanna move beyond race. Of course, too cowardly to say it up front. Him, Bill Rhoden, Mike Wilbon, John Salley, Chuck D, Russell Simmons, and soooo many others = you, too, Jason Whitlock. Take a look while I vomit.....PTI, Best Damn Sports Show, the sports talk show of your choice awaits.
It's actually quite common: they simply look at the sports and/or entertainment figure's skin color, skip right over the issue, especially the morality part. Then, make every excuse to justify the black's action, and if necessary, condemning the white. Just-a-tip toein around serious, destructive issues with black athletes/entertainers.
EVERYTHING along racial lines, while telling dumbasses like yours truly that they're being objective. Right, right..... objectively bigoted - but that's okay; Blacks can't be racists, anyway. All under the guise of sport commentary.
Good riddance, Ralphy boy.
(Hey, never said I'd agree with everyone. And who knows, my heart could fail me tomorrow - I'm petrified - so what a great excuse to write a hate whitey sports column today!!)
Posted by: Beau at June 15, 2004 06:28 AM (GpmN8)
4
From Wileys last column, for you Beau-
[speaking about the "Two on Two" show on ESPN where Larry Bird clumsily spoke about white and black atheletes in pro sports, Magic tried to defend him, and Lebron and Carmelo rolled their eyes]
"The concept of race came up, and the young men seemed to handle it much more adroitly and appropriately -- i.e., they didn't give a s*** about it -- than the old men did. As Bird became more verbally entangled in Iceberg Jim's web, 'Melo and LeBron looked on incredulously, and I wondered if all this was much more our problem than theirs. But then I decided, nahhhhh ..."
I never thought that Wiley "came straight out the Black Victimology Box", if anything he was stating what needed to be said. Read the rest of this article for more-
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=wiley/040610
Posted by: Tman at June 15, 2004 06:43 AM (Fho+X)
5
I didn't always agree with Wiley when he stepped outside the sports page; hell, I rarely did.
But, unlike many on that side of the fence, he had the rare gift of being able to actually SAY what he meant.
Too many moonbats can't say that for themselves.
Posted by: mhking at June 15, 2004 06:52 AM (H7t3Y)
6
Yeah Ralph Wiley was a liberal. I read his most well-known book years ago. I didn't know he was in his 50s. My prayers go out to his family.
Posted by: La Shawn Barber at June 15, 2004 07:41 AM (Qa+f/)
7
Tmam,
I'm a seasoned vet, so no need pass on any of his garbage for me to read......and don't flatter yourself in thinking I took your bait. Now send me a Spike Lee movie post-Mo Betta Blues so I can apply the Yankees mini-bat to it.
He's just another 50-something negro who's time has clearly passed. What, you think I'm a liberal willing to change, excuse me, LOWER standards 'cause a brotha got black skin?
Or maybe even waffle, flip-flop, possibly sit on the fence to see what everyone else is saying and jump the bandwagon?
Mr. T? Mrs. T? I hear your alarm clock goin off......keep dreamin. I've got more courage than that.
And have a nice day.
Posted by: Beau at June 15, 2004 08:45 AM (GpmN8)
8
Beau,
I thought his comment that the media beats us over the head with race related garbage issues, like Jim Greys question to Bird, was an example of how he brings a perspective to these issues that many people are feeling but not writing. Like he said with Lebron and Melo-
"The concept of race came up, and the young men seemed to handle it much more adroitly and appropriately -- i.e., they didn't give a s*** about it -- than the old men did."
Maybe you need to chill out. And stop dancing on a dead mans grave, that would be nice too.
And thanks, I'm having a wonderful day.
Posted by: Tman at June 15, 2004 09:12 AM (Fho+X)
9
MANY PEOPLE WON'T MISS RALPH WILEY OR HUNTER S. THOMPSON!
Posted by: ROGER GOLD at February 20, 2005 08:50 PM (gAoHF)
10
Recent research from leading American universities has produced strong evidence that the civil rights revolution of the past half century has failed African Americans economically and educationally. Angela O’Rand and Mary Elizabeth Hughes, both professors of sociology at Duke University, reveal in their book The Life and Times of the Baby Boomers, released last week, that black Americans born between 1946 and 1964 earn only two thirds of what American whites earn—no more, relative to whites, than their parents and grandparents earned. Even more surprising is O’Rand and Hughes’s finding that African Americans were graduating at the same rate as whites eighty to ninety years ago, but that graduation rates for blacks peaked in the mid-1950s—at the start of the movement for racial integration. Professor Richard Sander, of the UCLA School of Law, reports on studies that indicate that affirmative action and similar programs has made blacks admitted to elite universities less likely to pursue Ph.Ds after four years of competition with white and Asian undergraduates than are black at state universities (from Stephen Cole and Elinor Barber’s Increasing Faculty Diversity, Harvard University Press, 2003), while Dartmouth psychologist Rogers Elliott and three colleagues discovered that half of blacks admitted to college by racial preferences abandon majors in science due to their academic disadvantage (“The Role of Ethnicity in Choosing and Leaving Science in Highly Selective Institutions,” 37 Research in Higher Education, 681, 695-696, 1996). Professor Hughes notes that the persistent failure to achieve racial equality in income and education “…suggests there are very deep root causes here, not one-answer causes.” Granted the cause isn’t the stock answer of “racism”—but it’s more than likely that race explains a good deal of the problem.
Posted by: Ames Tiedeman at May 24, 2005 09:54 AM (xze1m)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Iran sez "We're going nuclear, and you can't do a damn thing 'bout it!"
Iranian Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi |
Iran has made a bold statement to the western world, insisting that they do plan on developing nuclear weapons in the near future, and the only thing that the West can do is sit back and
welcome them to the "nuclear club."Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi rejected further outside influence on Tehran's nuclear ambitions two days before the International Atomic Energy Agency board of governors meets to discuss Iran's highly controversial program."We won't accept any new obligations," Kharrazi said. "Iran has a high technical capability and has to be recognized by the international community as a member of the nuclear club. This is an irreversible path."
Two major questions come to mind. First, are we -- the United States -- going to sit around and allow another member of the 'Axis of Evil' obtain nuclear weapons, or are we going to go in and stop them?
Of course, that is barring a realistic outcome of the second question: Do you really think that Israel will sit still and allow -- yes, allow -- an Arab nation to develop nuclear weapons in their own back yard?
Think about this -- missles fired from Iran today can hit Israel. You know that Israel has to be scared spitless of this possibility.
And we thought India/Pakistan would go up first?
Israel might sit still, at least as long as George Bush is in the White House directing traffic. But let Ketchup Boy win the election. Mark my words, if Kerry wins, the whole damn place is going to go up like a powder keg.
Posted by: mhking at
06:26 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 292 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Solid analysis, Michael. You're the first person to suggest this to me, but it makes very good sense.
Posted by: Pat Curley at June 14, 2004 11:52 AM (PJWdB)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I've heard of bad taste, but just damn.
I ran across
this from
AllahPundit last night, and the only comment I can come up with is
"Just damn."This truly leaves me speechless.
Posted by: mhking at
06:06 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
June 13, 2004
AQ videotapes ANOTHER execution of an American
Al Qaeda terrorists have
released another internet videotape of an execution; this time, purportedly of the murder of an American citizen, Robert Jacob, who worked for defense contractor Vinnell Corp. The murder supposedly took place in the Saudi Arabian capitol of Riyadh last week.
Of course, the video made the top of the rotation on Al Jazeera over the past few days.
The video was released on a site, that, according to US intelligence officials, has been used by terrorists affiliated wtih Al Qaeda.
The video, less than two minutes long, does not show any faces. It begins with men running in a garage and a voice yelling in English, "No, no, please!" A shot is fired, and the body of what appears to be a Western man falls to the ground. Two gunmen fire at least 10 more shots at the fallen man, then one kneels by his head and motions as if he is beheading him.
The video can be downloaded from
http://members.lycos.co.uk/markazilam/markaz.htm.
AQ are like fire ants. They need to die. Now. Horribly. And without prejudice, lest they attack us in our homes.
Anybody got any Spectracide?
Posted by: mhking at
05:42 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 207 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I have amazed by the media silence that has greeted this story. Actually, I am truly distressed. Poor Nick Berg made some small waves, but Robert Jacob does not even get a mention.
I can't understand how the abuses of Iraqi prisoners could possably "out media" these two REAL atrocities.
I am even dissapointed in the blog world (yourself excluded) who have not even mentioned this shocking crime. (At least not those I have visited since it happened).
The bloody ABC (Australia) is still raving on like the lunatic anti west organisation it is, about Iraqi abuses. Every single friggen day.
Posted by: Patrick at June 14, 2004 06:55 PM (zn+6s)
2
Patrick
I agree with you entirely. Actually SBS is even worse than the ABC.
Tonight we were teated to "the thais are massacring the poor muslim jihadists of south thailand" part one.they gave ABU GHRAIB a rest
The problem is that none have any foreign correspondants who have any in depth, historical knowledge of the ME.
However even if they did , he or she would probably be muzzled.
Thank goodness for blog sites.
Coming shortly after the nick berg slaughter, this might damage their drusade against the US and Australian governments.
But if you want real mainstream media suppression look at the dhohar testimony of the jihadists on jihadwatch.org. from memri.
Posted by: chevalier at June 16, 2004 04:17 AM (VG+nN)
3
You are right that these bestial mozzies have to be exterminated, but I would like them more to maggots.
Posted by: Nigel Boag at June 20, 2004 02:28 AM (hWXa8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Intl Red Cross to USA: "Charge Saddam by 6/30 or let him go!"
The International Committee on the Red Cross has
given the United States an ultimatum: Charge Saddam Hussain by June 30, or free him.
Nada Doumani, a spokeswoman for the ICRC, told the (UK) Guardian: "The United States defines Saddam Hussein as a prisoner of war. At the end of an occupation PoWs have to be released provided they have no penal charges against them."Her comments came as the international body, the only independent group with access to detainees in US custody, becomes increasingly concerned over the legal limbo in which thousands of people are being held in the run-up to the transfer of power at the end of the month.
"There are all these people kept in a legal vacuum. No one should be left not knowing their legal status. Their judicial rights must be assured," Ms Doumani said.
"If we consider the occupation ends on June 30, that would mean it's the end of the international armed conflict. This is the legal situation.
"When the conflict ends the prisoners of war should be released according to the Geneva conventions," Ms Doumani said.
I've got a solution, which involves a message to the ICRC: "What part of
NO, do you not understand?"
Posted by: mhking at
05:17 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 229 words, total size 2 kb.
1
There's more on this story developing. The Iraqi interim govt announced we're handing over Saddam in two weeks, and America promptly responded by saying no such plans existed. This story has legs. And hair.
Posted by: Beck at June 15, 2004 04:35 AM (fllfQ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Fahrenheit 9/11 rated "R"; Moore appeals decision
Distributors for Michael Moore's documentary
Fahrenheit 9/11 are
trying to get the film's rating changed now.
The film has been rated "R" by the Motion Picture Association of America, which means that anyone under the age of 17 must come with an adult.
Moore, in his infinite wisdom, insists that because teenagers are those who may have to go to war in the near future, they should be able to see the film without the interference of adults.
"It is sadly very possible that many fifteen and sixteen years olds will be asked and recruited to serve in Iraq in the next couple of years," said Michael Moore. "If they are old enough to be recruited and capable of being in combat and risking their lives, they certainly deserve the right to see what is going on in Iraq.""Lions Gate Films will continue to aggressively support the artistic visions of our filmmakers. The MPAA rating applied to 'Fahrenheit 9/11' is completely unjustified," said (Tom) Ortenberg (President of Lions Gate Films Releasing). "We are adamant about overturning this decision in an expeditious manner to ensure that as many people as possible, including young adults who represent the future of our nation, are able to see one of the most important and thought-provoking films of our time in theaters on June 25."
"IFC has great concerns with the MPAA's decision and will do everything within its legal power to fight this unjust rating judgment," stated IFC Entertainment President Jonathan Sehring. "With a film like 'Fahrenheit 9/11', IFC is of the strong belief that all filmgoers should be empowered to make their own viewing decisions. The bottom line is this - during these times, it is crucial for the young people of this country to be fully informed. Michael Moore's voice deserves a broad audience and we are confident this ratings decision will ultimately be overturned."
Lions' Gate & IFC have filed an emergency appeal with MPAA President Jack Valenti, to overturn the original rating.
The politically charged film (in the eyes of many -- myself included -- pure anti-Bush propaganda film) is due to be released nationally June 25.
Posted by: mhking at
04:03 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 371 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Does "R" stand for "Revolting"?
Posted by: McGehee at June 13, 2004 04:33 PM (BCOpM)
2
What was in the film that made it an R?
Posted by: Lola at June 14, 2004 04:31 AM (V1eTE)
3
Uh, he missed the part where we don't have a draft. Or do I just believe that because I've been brainwashed by the evil Bushitler?
Plenty of time for the 16 year olds to see it now that we have this cool invention called a DVD.
Posted by: Deb at June 14, 2004 06:26 AM (hua9p)
4
Maybe it was the video's in the movie showing people being beheaded....could that have something to do with an R rating??? /sarcasmoff
Posted by: Volt at April 23, 2005 11:43 AM (HV9EF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Nicole Kidman in romantic romp with 10 year-old in film
Actress Nicole Kidman is
sparking a controversy over her upcoming film
Birth, in which her character gets up close and personal with a ten year-old boy.
The shocking movie Birth will feature bizarre scenes of her nude and getting romantic with an underage lad she believes is the reincarnation of her dead husband.The weird flick sees Kidman playing a widow, and two scenes have got New Line Cinema hot under the collar. Kidman and the boy strip off together to submerge in bubbles and then they even lock lips.
Executives are contemplating scrapping the Johnathan Glazer-directed motion picture even before it is released.
Posted by: mhking at
03:54 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 122 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Haven't these people heard that what they're doing is a crime in most countries? When do we arrest the cast & crew?
Posted by: The Black Republican at June 13, 2004 07:43 PM (9VCzx)
Posted by: Lola at June 14, 2004 04:31 AM (V1eTE)
3
And just when I thought she was starting to see the light of day by dropping that flake Tom Cruise. She goes and does a film like this. Why are all the hot ones at least a couple of sandwhiches shy of a picknic?
Oh well, no more Kidman flims for this kid.
Posted by: Guy S. at June 15, 2004 09:04 PM (f6cjG)
4
What the fuk. This is one luck little kid. Bastard!
Posted by: Sploodge at August 29, 2004 05:40 AM (tgapt)
5
Uh... ew. Yeah, unless there were some camera tricks used where the boy never really saw Kidman naked and it just LOOKS like he did, these people should be arrested. And even if camera tricks were used, they couldn't have been used for the kissing scene. Geez, no wonder she was booed at that one place... And no, that kid is NOT lucky. He's probably being forced by his parents to be in this uncomfortable and obscene situation. Who knows what crap his parents do to him at home. Ugh...
Posted by: DZM at September 11, 2004 10:33 PM (3/oWv)
6
god. yall are such prudes. its a movie, and frankly it'll probably be great. its a movie, get over it.
Posted by: mackenzie at October 22, 2004 05:17 PM (nvhd2)
7
Thank you mackenzie. No one should be arrested. It is a movie. Thanks for making that clear. I am sure the boy new plain well what he was going to do, and it is just a kiss. I am also totally sure that he did not really see her naked. I say bravo. Nicole is awesome anyway I see it, plus the kid is probably the same size as Tom Cruis. LOL!!!
Posted by: Shon at October 27, 2004 01:52 PM (sqPon)
8
What's the big deal. Maybe if the intent of the scene was to show a grown woman trying to seduce a young boy, but this scene depicts a woman still attracted to her husband (who happens to be reincarnated in a boys body). It's the intenet what matters, not the scene. In Japan its perfectly natural for fathers/mothers to take bathes together with their children with no sexual intention whatso ever.
Posted by: James at November 03, 2004 01:35 AM (8m2s2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
87kb generated in CPU 0.0952, elapsed 0.4172 seconds.
53 queries taking 0.4028 seconds, 184 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.