August 24, 2005

Crazy Pat says "Not assassinate, KIDNAP..."

Pat Robertson, under fire for comments on Monday's edition of The 700 Club, is now saying that by "take him out," he didn't mean to assassinate Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. Robertson says that actually, he meant for Chavez to be kidnapped.

Conservative U.S. evangelist Pat Robertson, who called for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, said on Wednesday he was misinterpreted and there were a number of ways to "take him out" including kidnapping.

"I said our special forces could take him out. Take him out could be a number of things including kidnapping," Robertson said on his "The 700 Club" television program.

"There are a number of ways of taking out a dictator from power besides killing him. I was misinterpreted," Robertson added.

I said it before, I'll say it again. Pat is off his rocker.

What he's saying is anathematic to Christianity.

UPDATE: Robertson formally apologized in a written statement this afternoon for calling for Chavez's assassination.

"Is it right to call for assassination? No, and I apologize for that statement," he said in a written statement.
Apology notwithstanding, I still think Robertson is off his rocker, and he puts a bad mark both on Christianity and on conservative principles.

Posted by: mhking at 10:08 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 211 words, total size 2 kb.

1 And here I thought he meant 'take him out' on a date.

Posted by: spacemonkey at August 24, 2005 11:32 AM (DN55C)

2 "...Apology notwithstanding, I still think Robertson is off his rocker, and he puts a bad mark both on Christianity and on conservative principles." No worries. He cannot damage those damaged goods.

Posted by: Don McArthur at August 24, 2005 12:43 PM (bTu3D)

3 I won't suggest we kidnap Robertson but, some kind of intervention is needed.

Posted by: Mark at August 24, 2005 01:13 PM (WP9Br)

4 I am not defending him. I dont agree with his politics. But you cant say that killing in defense of the nation is unchristian. This is a man friendly with iran and communist cuba. I dont say we shouldkill him because of the consequences. The hebew is thou shalt not MURDER. its absurd to say taht christians shold never engage in defenseive warfare. T

Posted by: shari at August 24, 2005 05:02 PM (e8DOf)

5 Well clarified shari. As far as how to deal with Chavez, I don't have the answer. However, I think it's obvious that there's real potential for a problem there.

Posted by: JD at August 24, 2005 09:16 PM (Xho/C)

6 Pat is right. Chavez is an enemy and a wicked man. Put him out. Why do you think we have spys and special ops people? To make nicey nice to Americas sworn enemies? As for Venezuela being a soveriegn nation, let the better nation win...

Posted by: mike at August 30, 2005 07:51 PM (b8ZmP)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
14kb generated in CPU 0.0096, elapsed 0.3908 seconds.
41 queries taking 0.3845 seconds, 100 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.